-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 358
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
test: migrate VariableReferencesTest to JUnit 5 #4497
test: migrate VariableReferencesTest to JUnit 5 #4497
Conversation
The following has changed in the code: Replaced @before annotation with @beforeeach at method setup Replaced junit 4 test annotation with junit 5 test annotation in testCheckModelConsistency Replaced junit 4 test annotation with junit 5 test annotation in testCatchVariableReferenceFunction Replaced junit 4 test annotation with junit 5 test annotation in testLocalVariableReferenceFunction Replaced junit 4 test annotation with junit 5 test annotation in testParameterReferenceFunction Replaced junit 4 test annotation with junit 5 test annotation in testVariableReferenceFunction Replaced junit 4 test annotation with junit 5 test annotation in testVariableScopeFunction Replaced junit 4 test annotation with junit 5 test annotation in testFieldScopeFunction Replaced junit 4 test annotation with junit 5 test annotation in testLocalVariableReferenceDeclarationFunction Replaced junit 4 test annotation with junit 5 test annotation in testPotentialVariableAccessFromStaticMethod Transformed junit4 assert to junit 5 assertion in testCheckModelConsistency Transformed junit4 assert to junit 5 assertion in testVariableScopeFunction Transformed junit4 assert to junit 5 assertion in testFieldScopeFunction Transformed junit4 assert to junit 5 assertion in testLocalVariableReferenceDeclarationFunction Transformed junit4 assert to junit 5 assertion in checkVariableAccess Transformed junit4 assert to junit 5 assertion in getLiteralValue Transformed junit4 assert to junit 5 assertion in testPotentialVariableAccessFromStaticMethod
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Suboptimal sniper printing in a couple of places.
assertEquals("Only these keys were found: "+context.unique.keySet(), context.maxKey, context.unique.size()); | ||
assertEquals("AllLocalVars#maxValue must be equal to maximum value number ", (int)getLiteralValue((CtVariable)modelClass.filterChildren(new NamedElementFilter<>(CtVariable.class,"maxValue")).first()), context.maxKey); | ||
assertEquals(context.maxKey, context.unique.size(), "Only these keys were found: " + context.unique.keySet()); | ||
assertEquals(((int) (getLiteralValue(((CtVariable) (modelClass.filterChildren(new NamedElementFilter<>(CtVariable.class, "maxValue")).first()))))), context.maxKey, "AllLocalVars#maxValue must be equal to maximum value number "); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ugh, sniper printing of casts at work here (see #3809 (comment)). Could you manually remove the redundant parentheses?
assertNotNull("The declaration of variable "+varRef.getSimpleName()+" in "+getParentMethodName(varRef)+" on line "+var.getPosition().getLine()+" with value "+getVariableReferenceValue(varRef)+" was not found", var); | ||
assertEquals("CtLocalVariableReference#getDeclaration returned wrong declaration in "+getParentMethodName(varRef), getVariableReferenceValue(varRef), (int)getLiteralValue(var)); | ||
assertNotNull(var, "The declaration of variable " + varRef.getSimpleName() + " in " + getParentMethodName(varRef) + " on line " + var.getPosition().getLine() + " with value " + getVariableReferenceValue(varRef) + " was not found"); | ||
assertEquals(getVariableReferenceValue(varRef), ((int) (getLiteralValue(var))), "CtLocalVariableReference#getDeclaration returned wrong declaration in " + getParentMethodName(varRef)); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Same as above.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
#3919
Change Log
The following bad smells are refactored:
Junit4-@before
The JUnit 4
@Before
annotation should be replaced with JUnit 5@BeforeEach
annotation.JUnit4-@test
The JUnit 4
@Test
annotation should be replaced with JUnit 5@Test
annotation.JUnit4Assertion
The JUnit4 assertion should be replaced with JUnit5 Assertions.
The following has changed in the code:
JUnit4-@test
testCheckModelConsistency
testCatchVariableReferenceFunction
testLocalVariableReferenceFunction
testParameterReferenceFunction
testVariableReferenceFunction
testVariableScopeFunction
testFieldScopeFunction
testLocalVariableReferenceDeclarationFunction
testPotentialVariableAccessFromStaticMethod
Junit4-@before
@Before
annotation with@BeforeEach
at methodsetup
JUnit4Assertion
checkKey
testCheckModelConsistency
testVariableScopeFunction
testFieldScopeFunction
testLocalVariableReferenceDeclarationFunction
checkVariableAccess
getLiteralValue
testPotentialVariableAccessFromStaticMethod