Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Move logic for identifier type validation / url generation from code to db #5271

Closed
scolapasta opened this issue Nov 2, 2018 · 1 comment
Labels
Component: Code Infrastructure formerly "Feature: Code Infrastructure" Feature: DOI & Handle Hackathon: Technical Debt Type: Suggestion an idea User Role: Hackathon Participant Core developers, frequent contributors, drive-by contributors, etc.

Comments

@scolapasta
Copy link
Contributor

In #4371, we added logic to validate author identifiers based on type and also to generate URLs. This is in the Java code, however, so now we can't just add a new type by just modifying the db, we need to add the corresponding code, as well. We agreed to accept this a technical debt in order to move #4371 along.

This issue is to track the moving of this from the code to the db. That is we want to define the URL schemes and validation in the database, and then have the code generically handle this.

@cmbz
Copy link

cmbz commented Aug 20, 2024

To focus on the most important features and bugs, we are closing issues created before 2020 (version 5.0) that are not new feature requests with the label 'Type: Feature'.

If you created this issue and you feel the team should revisit this decision, please reopen the issue and leave a comment.

@cmbz cmbz closed this as completed Aug 20, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Component: Code Infrastructure formerly "Feature: Code Infrastructure" Feature: DOI & Handle Hackathon: Technical Debt Type: Suggestion an idea User Role: Hackathon Participant Core developers, frequent contributors, drive-by contributors, etc.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants