🎨 make folders optional + improvements ⚠️

[matusdrobuliak66]

What do these changes do?

• 🎨 folders improvements
  • pass variable to frontend -> for enable/disable folders plugin
  • in the folders listing, support folder_id = "null" or "none"
  • improve pagination model on the folders listing (include total count metadata)
  • add default sorting on folders listing (modified_at)
  • add sorting query to folders query (name, description)
  • On folder create, return the whole Folder object (including the access rights, owner)
  • Add folder get endpoint
  • in the project listing, support folder_id = "null" or "none"
  • Filter folders by product

Related issue/s

• closes web API: /folders CRUD operations osparc-issues#1566
• relates Project Folders in User Workspace (Nov.) osparc-issues#716

How to test

Dev-ops checklist

• ⚠️ https://git.speag.com/oSparc/osparc-ops-deployment-configuration/-/merge_requests/775
• No ENV changes or I properly updated ENV (read the instruction)

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 94.44444% with 3 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 88.1%. Comparing base (cafbf96) to head (98a81ab).
Report is 434 commits behind head on master.

Files	Patch %	Lines
...ore_service_webserver/folders/_folders_handlers.py	85.7%	2 Missing ⚠️
...re_service_webserver/projects/_folders_handlers.py	83.3%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##           master   #6155      +/-   ##
=========================================
+ Coverage    84.5%   88.1%    +3.5%     
=========================================
  Files          10    1349    +1339     
  Lines         214   58150   +57936     
  Branches       25    1250    +1225     
=========================================
+ Hits          181   51249   +51068     
- Misses         23    6633    +6610     
- Partials       10     268     +258     

Flag	Coverage Δ
integrationtests	64.8% <32.5%> (?)
unittests	85.9% <94.4%> (+1.4%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files	Coverage Δ
...rc/models_library/api_schemas_webserver/folders.py	100.0% <100.0%> (ø)
...rary/src/models_library/utils/common_validators.py	76.4% <100.0%> (ø)
...re_service_webserver/application_settings_utils.py	98.0% <ø> (ø)
.../simcore_service_webserver/folders/_folders_api.py	100.0% <100.0%> (ø)
...mcore_service_webserver/projects/_crud_api_read.py	96.6% <100.0%> (ø)
...ervice_webserver/projects/_crud_handlers_models.py	98.1% <100.0%> (ø)
...erver/src/simcore_service_webserver/projects/db.py	97.4% <100.0%> (ø)
...re_service_webserver/projects/_folders_handlers.py	93.7% <83.3%> (ø)
...ore_service_webserver/folders/_folders_handlers.py	93.0% <85.7%> (ø)

... and 1301 files with indirect coverage changes

[odeimaiz]

merci

[sanderegg]

ok consider my comments. thanks

[pcrespov]

thx. Left some suggestions

[odeimaiz]

Great, thank you very much

[pcrespov]

Great!thx!

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud