✨ webapi: new descriptionUI flag to render service a single page UI 🗃️

[pcrespov]

What do these changes do?

A new flag descriptionUi (in web-api response v0.42.0 → v0.43.0) or description_ui (in pg table) on the service meta-data that determines how the description markdown is rendered in the UI (i.e. the service tiles). Specifically, it indicates whether the description should be presented as a single web page (=true) or in another structured format (default=false). This field is primarily used by the front-end of the application to decide on the presentation style of the service's metadata.

Highlights

• new column description_ui in pg database
• new field in service metadata models returned in get and input parameter for update operations in catalog rpc-api
• new field in service metadata models responses in GET and body of PATCH for webserver rest-api (v0.42.0 → v0.43.0)

Related issue/s

• part of More control over service metadata #5476

How to test

in place

Dev-ops checklist

• No ENV changes or I properly updated ENV (read the instruction)

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 88.1%. Comparing base (cafbf96) to head (14c5fa7).
Report is 496 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##           master   #6290      +/-   ##
=========================================
+ Coverage    84.5%   88.1%    +3.5%     
=========================================
  Files          10    1477    +1467     
  Lines         214   61114   +60900     
  Branches       25    2063    +2038     
=========================================
+ Hits          181   53873   +53692     
- Misses         23    6926    +6903     
- Partials       10     315     +305     

Flag	Coverage Δ
integrationtests	64.8% <ø> (?)
unittests	86.1% <100.0%> (+1.5%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
...src/models_library/api_schemas_catalog/services.py	100.0% <100.0%> (ø)
...models-library/src/models_library/services_base.py	100.0% <100.0%> (ø)
...y/src/models_library/services_metadata_editable.py	100.0% <100.0%> (ø)
.../src/models_library/services_metadata_published.py	100.0% <ø> (ø)
...e/src/simcore_postgres_database/models/services.py	100.0% <100.0%> (ø)
...e_service_catalog/db/repositories/_services_sql.py	100.0% <ø> (ø)
...imcore_service_catalog/db/repositories/services.py	83.5% <ø> (ø)
.../src/simcore_service_catalog/models/services_db.py	100.0% <100.0%> (ø)
...c/simcore_service_catalog/services/services_api.py	92.0% <ø> (ø)

... and 1421 files with indirect coverage changes

[odeimaiz]

Thanks 👍

[sanderegg]

thanks. a few thoughts

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud