Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update ouroboros-network #4764

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Conversation

newhoggy
Copy link
Contributor

@newhoggy newhoggy commented Jan 10, 2023

Block by IntersectMBO/ouroboros-network#4261, because ouroboros-network is unusable due to malformed cabal files.

@newhoggy newhoggy force-pushed the newhoggy/update-ouroboros-network branch from ec17c33 to c0f0068 Compare January 10, 2023 07:57
@newhoggy newhoggy force-pushed the newhoggy/update-ouroboros-network branch 2 times, most recently from b49d48b to cf8893f Compare January 11, 2023 01:32
Copy link
Contributor

@coot coot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@@ -133,6 +133,8 @@ library
, ouroboros-consensus-protocol
, ouroboros-consensus-shelley
, ouroboros-network
, ouroboros-network-api
, ouroboros-network-protocols
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice, so cardano-cli does not depend on ouroboros-consensus-diffusion :)

@@ -168,10 +168,13 @@ library
, ouroboros-consensus ^>= 0.1.0.2
, ouroboros-consensus-byron
, ouroboros-consensus-cardano
, ouroboros-consensus-diffusion
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@nfrisby @dnadales 🤔 maybe we should also have ouroboros-consensus-api which exports a stable api and removes the direct dependency of lib:cardano-node on ouroboros-consensus 💡 (I have no idea how intrusive that would be).

@@ -140,7 +140,7 @@ library
, filepath
, mime-mail
, optparse-applicative
, ouroboros-network
, ouroboros-network-api
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nice 😄

@newhoggy newhoggy force-pushed the newhoggy/update-ouroboros-network branch from cf8893f to af8f0d6 Compare January 17, 2023 23:38
@newhoggy newhoggy force-pushed the newhoggy/update-ouroboros-network branch from af8f0d6 to 6f97301 Compare January 26, 2023 17:23
@newhoggy newhoggy marked this pull request as ready for review January 26, 2023 17:24
@newhoggy newhoggy requested a review from coot January 26, 2023 17:24
@newhoggy newhoggy force-pushed the newhoggy/update-ouroboros-network branch from 6f97301 to a7ac826 Compare January 26, 2023 18:20
Copy link
Contributor

@coot coot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@newhoggy newhoggy force-pushed the newhoggy/update-ouroboros-network branch from a7ac826 to c7159a2 Compare January 28, 2023 18:34
@bolt12
Copy link
Contributor

bolt12 commented Feb 1, 2023

bump 😄

Comment on lines +172 to +176
source-repository-package
type: git
location: https://github.com/input-output-hk/ekg-forward-fork
tag: 6cf25fbbaf9815e07f695982da4cfbb1581239c3
--sha256: 0qwvx04l9q3h7acb0a3b8iarqcn5bkqhwaplbga5pvryqp3lhn00
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why are we using a fork of our own library?

Copy link
Contributor

@coot coot Mar 8, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Also we shouldn't use srps any more, if we need a newer version of ekg-forward lets release one to CHaP.

@newhoggy
Copy link
Contributor Author

This is obsolete.

@newhoggy newhoggy closed this Mar 17, 2023
@newhoggy newhoggy deleted the newhoggy/update-ouroboros-network branch March 17, 2023 12:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants