Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

File path handling in featurizer module #242

Merged
merged 15 commits into from
Feb 26, 2024
Merged

Conversation

kaueltzen
Copy link
Contributor

@kaueltzen kaueltzen commented Feb 26, 2024

Resolves issue #229 .
File path handling in featurizer module is now done in two separate functions in utils.py.
Also did some clean-ups and added parameter checking for BatchSummaryFeaturizer.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 26, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 97.70%. Comparing base (f37797b) to head (8969adc).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #242      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   97.47%   97.70%   +0.23%     
==========================================
  Files          11       12       +1     
  Lines        2848     2698     -150     
==========================================
- Hits         2776     2636     -140     
+ Misses         72       62      -10     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@kaueltzen kaueltzen marked this pull request as ready for review February 26, 2024 16:08
@naik-aakash
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks @kaueltzen ! I think this can be merged as well if there are not any comments @JaGeo 😄

@JaGeo JaGeo merged commit 6916d28 into JaGeo:main Feb 26, 2024
26 checks passed
@JaGeo JaGeo changed the title [WIP] File path handling in featurizer module File path handling in featurizer module Feb 26, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants