Python 3.12 support

[JaGeo]

No description provided.

[JaGeo]

@naik-aakash I deactivated flake8 for now. There seems to be an issue with the installation or a bug.
My solution for the Python 3.12 compatibility might not be optimal but should work on Linux at least.

[naik-aakash]

@naik-aakash I deactivated flake8 for now. There seems to be an issue with the installation or a bug. My solution for the Python 3.12 compatibility might not be optimal but should work on Linux at least.

Hi @JaGeo , you mean flake8 fails on python 3.12 ?

[JaGeo]

@naik-aakash I deactivated flake8 for now. There seems to be an issue with the installation or a bug. My solution for the Python 3.12 compatibility might not be optimal but should work on Linux at least.

Hi @JaGeo , you mean flake8 fails on python 3.12 ?

Yes, not working. I also cannot fix this very last error. I am not sure if they really drop support for asserting to a Bool?

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 97.37%. Comparing base (55f08a9) to head (2b627fe).

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #282      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   97.19%   97.37%   +0.18%     
==========================================
  Files          12       12              
  Lines        2672     2671       -1     
==========================================
+ Hits         2597     2601       +4     
+ Misses         75       70       -5     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[JaGeo]

@naik-aakash I did it but we have to update "get_lobster_calc_quality_summary" as it raises many warnings.

[naik-aakash]

@naik-aakash I did it but we have to update "get_lobster_calc_quality_summary" as it raises many warnings.

But this is what was expected to raise warnings if certain criteria is not met. Will think of other ways to alert users. At this time I don't have any other idea to do the same. And that particular test was written to check for all warnings specifically. In actual case, this won't happen

[JaGeo]

@naik-aakash I did it but we have to update "get_lobster_calc_quality_summary" as it raises many warnings.

But this is what was expected to raise warnings if certain criteria is not met. Will think of other ways to alert users. At this time I don't have any other idea to do the same. And that particular test was written to check for all warnings specifically. In actual case, this won't happen

No, please check it out. There are warnings about how you test if a value is None. This is only a problem in newer Python versions or during the actions