Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Feature Request]: Redo of readme #19

Closed
ghost opened this issue Oct 19, 2024 · 2 comments
Closed

[Feature Request]: Redo of readme #19

ghost opened this issue Oct 19, 2024 · 2 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Oct 19, 2024

Feature Request

Description

I was confuzed by readme structure. I want it to be done more userfriendly. I was stunned at the moment of reading these 3 consecutive notices about gdm
"If you have login Manager already like GDM (gnome login manager), I highly advice not to install SDDM. But if you decide to install SDDM, see here JaKooLit/Debian-Hyprland#2

Important

If you are using Gnome already, DO NOT install the SDDM. The GDM Login Manager works well with Hyprland. For some reason, during installation, you will be asked which login manager you wanted to use. But during my test, nothing happened.

Warning

If you have GDM already as log-in manager, DO NOT install SDDM You will encounter issues. See JaKooLit/Debian-Hyprland#2"

Proposed Solution

Remake it whole so it is structurized as a step by step guide. An easy to follow and not just throw any information.

@ghost ghost added the enhancement New feature or request label Oct 19, 2024
@ghost
Copy link
Author

ghost commented Oct 19, 2024

branch 24.10

@JaKooLit
Copy link
Owner

well even with those warnings and notice... some people will still choose to install sddm..

but sure ill remake and make one paragraph only.

thanks

JaKooLit added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 1, 2025
JaKooLit added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 1, 2025
JaKooLit added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 1, 2025
@JaKooLit JaKooLit closed this as completed Jan 1, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant