weighted average for find_max_in_equal_area

[JoranAngevaare]

In find_max_in_equal_area we did not use a weighted average, so we add that feature in this PR

[coveralls]

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 13501635704

Warning: This coverage report may be inaccurate.

This pull request's base commit is no longer the HEAD commit of its target branch. This means it includes changes from outside the original pull request, including, potentially, unrelated coverage changes.

• For more information on this, see Tracking coverage changes with pull request builds.
• To avoid this issue with future PRs, see these Recommended CI Configurations.
• For a quick fix, rebase this PR at GitHub. Your next report should be accurate.

Details

• 0 of 2 (0.0%) changed or added relevant lines in 1 file are covered.
• 276 unchanged lines in 10 files lost coverage.
• Overall coverage decreased (-8.9%) to 78.268%

---

Changes Missing Coverage	Covered Lines	Changed/Added Lines	%
optim_esm_tools/analyze/region_calculation.py	0	2	0.0%

Files with Coverage Reduction	New Missed Lines	%
optim_esm_tools/analyze/clustering.py	1	96.88%
optim_esm_tools/region_finding/iter_ranges.py	1	97.22%
optim_esm_tools/analyze/cmip_handler.py	2	92.11%
optim_esm_tools/analyze/time_statistics.py	4	81.36%
optim_esm_tools/analyze/xarray_tools.py	7	85.24%
optim_esm_tools/analyze/merge_candidate_regions.py	10	90.91%
optim_esm_tools/region_finding/_base.py	10	75.76%
optim_esm_tools/analyze/tools.py	23	59.24%
optim_esm_tools/analyze/find_matches.py	25	66.18%
optim_esm_tools/analyze/region_calculation.py	193	15.56%

Totals
Change from base Build 12764672925:	-8.9%
Covered Lines:	2431
Relevant Lines:	3106

---

💛 - Coveralls