Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Split AbstractTrees.jl into multiple files #48

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Feb 25, 2020

Conversation

jlumpe
Copy link
Collaborator

@jlumpe jlumpe commented Feb 10, 2020

This might just be a matter of personal preference, but I found that having (almost) everything in a single source file made it hard to read. I moved the code for printing, indexing, and iterating into their own files.

@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Feb 10, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #48 into master will decrease coverage by 0.11%.
The diff coverage is 59.6%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master      #48      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   63.35%   63.23%   -0.12%     
==========================================
  Files           3        6       +3     
  Lines         322      321       -1     
==========================================
- Hits          204      203       -1     
  Misses        118      118
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/AbstractTrees.jl 25% <ø> (-33.06%) ⬇️
src/indexing.jl 17.5% <17.5%> (ø)
src/iteration.jl 60.91% <60.91%> (ø)
src/printing.jl 95.12% <95.12%> (ø)
src/traits.jl 85% <0%> (-0.72%) ⬇️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 90f4d62...8e4f319. Read the comment docs.

@timholy timholy merged commit 240ede4 into JuliaCollections:master Feb 25, 2020
@timholy
Copy link
Member

timholy commented Feb 25, 2020

Sorry I failed again to notice this, very nice!

@jlumpe jlumpe deleted the split-files branch August 30, 2021 20:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants