-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 19
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Newbettersaving #150
Newbettersaving #150
Conversation
We want, that the buffersize is at most the length along the given dimension. Therefore we are penalizing buffers which are larger than the dimension length. This also surfaces the writefac parameter to the savecube function.
Benchmark resultJudge resultBenchmark Report for /home/runner/work/YAXArrays.jl/YAXArrays.jlJob Properties
ResultsA ratio greater than
Benchmark Group ListHere's a list of all the benchmark groups executed by this job:
Julia versioninfoTarget
Baseline
Target resultBenchmark Report for /home/runner/work/YAXArrays.jl/YAXArrays.jlJob Properties
ResultsBelow is a table of this job's results, obtained by running the benchmarks.
Benchmark Group ListHere's a list of all the benchmark groups executed by this job:
Julia versioninfo
Baseline resultBenchmark Report for /home/runner/work/YAXArrays.jl/YAXArrays.jlJob Properties
ResultsBelow is a table of this job's results, obtained by running the benchmarks.
Benchmark Group ListHere's a list of all the benchmark groups executed by this job:
Julia versioninfo
Runtime information
|
Codecov ReportBase: 73.35% // Head: 73.74% // Increases project coverage by
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #150 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 73.35% 73.74% +0.38%
==========================================
Files 12 12
Lines 1524 1691 +167
==========================================
+ Hits 1118 1247 +129
- Misses 406 444 +38
Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here. ☔ View full report at Codecov. |
Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 2875995948Warning: This coverage report may be inaccurate.This pull request's base commit is no longer the HEAD commit of its target branch. This means it includes changes from outside the original pull request, including, potentially, unrelated coverage changes.
Details
💛 - Coveralls |
Benchmark resultJudge resultBenchmark Report for /home/runner/work/YAXArrays.jl/YAXArrays.jlJob Properties
ResultsA ratio greater than
Benchmark Group ListHere's a list of all the benchmark groups executed by this job:
Julia versioninfoTarget
Baseline
Target resultBenchmark Report for /home/runner/work/YAXArrays.jl/YAXArrays.jlJob Properties
ResultsBelow is a table of this job's results, obtained by running the benchmarks.
Benchmark Group ListHere's a list of all the benchmark groups executed by this job:
Julia versioninfo
Baseline resultBenchmark Report for /home/runner/work/YAXArrays.jl/YAXArrays.jlJob Properties
ResultsBelow is a table of this job's results, obtained by running the benchmarks.
Benchmark Group ListHere's a list of all the benchmark groups executed by this job:
Julia versioninfo
Runtime information
|
I have fixed a few things related to missing values so that it should be possible to load saved cubes again. Whoever wants to test this @felixcremer @lazarusA @mweynants you can get the current branch running in a fresh environment with I am off for vacation now, but please feel free to post issues and comments for the branch here. |
In principle I would like to merge this. However, I think @felixcremer was preparing a review with a lot of comments. Do you have some kind of timeline here? |
Co-authored-by: Felix Cremer <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Felix Cremer <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Felix Cremer <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Felix Cremer <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Felix Cremer <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Felix Cremer <[email protected]>
I also removed the skeleton keyword from the append_dataset function, because it haven't been used in the function body and I don't see the use case.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think, that I fixed all things, that we discussed yesterday.
@meggart I still have one question:
What is the use case for an append_dataset skeleton and should the keyword get a default value. Because currently the skeleton keyword argument is not used in the append_dataset function.
Apart from that I think this PR is now good to go.
I just started the registration process. So this should be available soon. |
Supersedes #132
Had to switch to a new branch when rebasing, sorry for the confusion