Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Docs for volume preserving attention #134

Merged
merged 15 commits into from
Apr 18, 2024

Conversation

benedict-96
Copy link
Collaborator

@benedict-96 benedict-96 commented Apr 16, 2024

Added docs for VolumePreservingAttention and fixed some bits.

  1. Added a tutorial on VolumePreservingAttention.
  2. Expanded the docs on the attention mechanism.
  3. Added a test for the cpu inverse in test/kernels/tensor_inverse.jl

@benedict-96 benedict-96 requested a review from michakraus April 16, 2024 16:14
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 16, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 1 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 64.30%. Comparing base (b075906) to head (8a4ddbe).

Files Patch % Lines
src/layers/resnet.jl 0.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #134      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   63.69%   64.30%   +0.60%     
==========================================
  Files         117      117              
  Lines        3314     3314              
==========================================
+ Hits         2111     2131      +20     
+ Misses       1203     1183      -20     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@michakraus michakraus merged commit 13c4a60 into main Apr 18, 2024
12 of 16 checks passed
@michakraus michakraus deleted the docs_for_volume_preserving_attention branch April 18, 2024 14:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants