Fixed parenthesis error

[marsue]

No description provided.

[StefanKarpinski]

Since both of these evaluate to the same (correct) value, it's unclear to me that this was an error:

julia> -(3/4*im)
-0.0 - 0.75im

julia> -(3/4)*im
-0.0 - 0.75im

[yuyichao]

Isn't there some extra/missing minus signs going on here?

[yuyichao]

NVM, it is correct.

[marsue]

I didn't notice the precence of the *-operator, because the text is about the literal coefficient and the division.
Sorry my fault.

[marsue]

Leave the *-operator out would make the example more clear to me:
3/4im == 3/(4im) == -(3/4)im
But -(3/4)im evaluates to negative zero in the real part, whereas the other expressions have a positive zero…

[marsue]

I updated the patch.
Since the following equation is better, since it the focus is on the literal coefficient and the division operator and the priority of the multiplication is removed.

3/4im == 3/(4im) == -(3/4)im

I had read the previous equation (in a mathematical sense) as 3/4im == -(3/4im) which seemed to be an error to me.

[jiahao]

But -(3/4)im evaluates to negative zero in the real part, whereas the other expressions have a positive zero…

#10000

At this point this PR is just a cosmetic change which I don't think conveys significant value. However, some additional wording about paying attention to the parentheses in the expression would make a useful contribution.

[StefanKarpinski]

It seems a bit clearer, let's just merge it.

[tkelman]

Note that this was against the release branch. It's generally preferable to open PR's against master first.