Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

interpret &(a,b) as a call expresion #34767

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from
Closed

interpret &(a,b) as a call expresion #34767

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

birm
Copy link
Contributor

@birm birm commented Feb 14, 2020 •
edited
Loading

closes #34693
I believe that & is included in this list by accident, but I'm not exactly sure.

@Keno
Copy link
Member

Keno commented Feb 14, 2020

I believe that & is included in this list by accident, but I'm not exactly sure.

No, & used to be unary operator syntax for use in ccall. There's been talk about re-using it for automatic boxing.

@birm
Copy link
Contributor Author

birm commented Feb 14, 2020

Ah, it looks like this has been discussed in #34693 and earlier #6080.

@yuyichao
Copy link
Contributor

Yes. #34748 is only about printing and is not at all controversial. #34693 is about changing the parsing and is no decided on yet.

@birm birm changed the title allow &(a,b) to work interpret &(a,b) as a call expresion Feb 14, 2020
@birm
Copy link
Contributor Author

birm commented Feb 14, 2020

ok, I've changed the closes to reference #34693 instead of #34748

@birm
Copy link
Contributor Author

birm commented Feb 15, 2020 •
edited
Loading

This would/could also involve reverting part of #34688 if merged.

@birm birm closed this Feb 28, 2020
@yuyichao yuyichao mentioned this pull request Apr 11, 2020
Closed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Parse &xas a call expression
3 participants
@birm @Keno @yuyichao