Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

move adjoint outside of loop #241

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 25, 2019
Merged

move adjoint outside of loop #241

merged 1 commit into from
Mar 25, 2019

Conversation

vincentcp
Copy link
Contributor

@codecov-io
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #241 into master will increase coverage by 34.49%.
The diff coverage is 100%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #241       +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage   56.03%   90.52%   +34.49%     
===========================================
  Files          17       17               
  Lines        1740     1077      -663     
===========================================
  Hits          975      975               
+ Misses        765      102      -663
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/svdl.jl 92.64% <ø> (+33.49%) ⬆️
src/lsqr.jl 97.67% <100%> (+61.77%) ⬆️
src/lsmr.jl 100% <100%> (+67.37%) ⬆️
src/stationary_sparse.jl 84.54% <0%> (+11.88%) ⬆️
src/history.jl 92.42% <0%> (+17.11%) ⬆️
src/simple.jl 85.71% <0%> (+20.84%) ⬆️
src/gmres.jl 93.22% <0%> (+23.6%) ⬆️
src/stationary.jl 87.09% <0%> (+25.02%) ⬆️
src/cg.jl 95.34% <0%> (+30.26%) ⬆️
src/orthogonalize.jl 100% <0%> (+31.25%) ⬆️
... and 10 more

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 91cac26...c23bbeb. Read the comment docs.

@haampie haampie merged commit 17ef261 into JuliaLinearAlgebra:master Mar 25, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants