Steer readers to Package Extensions #117
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Should address #113
This PR assumes that Package Extensions is indeed the recommended route now.
If that is not the case, then the README should provide users with guidance
about when to use which approach.
For reference, there is a discourse discussion of how to serve both Julia 1.9 and above as well as earlier versions:
https://discourse.julialang.org/t/package-extensions-for-julia-1-9/93397
(I share Tim Holy's view there that it is not worth the effort, but if someone wants to put in the effort to update the README here to document it then please do!)