Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bugfix for the charge drift for detectors simulated on a cartesian grid #57

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 8, 2020
Merged

Bugfix for the charge drift for detectors simulated on a cartesian grid #57

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 8, 2020

Conversation

lmh91
Copy link
Collaborator

@lmh91 lmh91 commented Oct 8, 2020

There was a bug in the charge drift for simulations performed on a cartesian grid.
The checking whether the next point in the drift is still inside the detector was wrong.
This fix seems to fix it.

@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Oct 8, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #57 into master will decrease coverage by 0.00%.
The diff coverage is 60.00%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master      #57      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   44.10%   44.10%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files          72       72              
  Lines        5684     5687       +3     
==========================================
+ Hits         2507     2508       +1     
- Misses       3177     3179       +2     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/ChargeDrift/ChargeDrift.jl 58.82% <60.00%> (-0.78%) ⬇️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 2d38f7d...65c3f61. Read the comment docs.

@lmh91 lmh91 merged commit 881c93b into JuliaPhysics:master Oct 8, 2020
@lmh91 lmh91 deleted the bugfix_cartesian_charge_drift branch December 23, 2020 12:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants