Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

New package: AbstractNFFTs v0.1.0 #51544

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 5, 2022

Conversation

JuliaRegistrator
Copy link
Contributor

@JuliaRegistrator JuliaRegistrator commented Jan 2, 2022

JuliaRegistrator referenced this pull request in JuliaMath/NFFT.jl Jan 2, 2022
Introduced two new packages:
- AbstractNFFTs
- CuNFFT
@JuliaRegistrator JuliaRegistrator temporarily deployed to stopwatch January 2, 2022 13:50 Inactive
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jan 2, 2022

Your new package pull request does not meet the guidelines for auto-merging. Please make sure that you have read the General registry README and the AutoMerge guidelines. The following guidelines were not met:

  • Package name similar to 1 existing package.
    1. Similar to AbstractFFTs. Damerau-Levenshtein distance 1 is at or below cutoff of 2. Damerau-Levenshtein distance 1 between lowercased names is at or below cutoff of 1.

Note that the guidelines are only required for the pull request to be merged automatically. However, it is strongly recommended to follow them, since otherwise the pull request needs to be manually reviewed and merged by a human.

After you have fixed the AutoMerge issues, simple retrigger Registrator, which will automatically update this pull request. You do not need to change the version number in your Project.toml file (unless of course the AutoMerge issue is that you skipped a version number, in which case you should change the version number).

If you do not want to fix the AutoMerge issues, please post a comment explaining why you would like this pull request to be manually merged.

Since you are registering a new package, please make sure that you have also read the package naming guidelines: https://julialang.github.io/Pkg.jl/dev/creating-packages/#Package-naming-guidelines-1


If you want to prevent this pull request from being auto-merged, simply leave a comment. If you want to post a comment without blocking auto-merging, you must include the text [noblock] in your comment.

UUID: 7f219486-4aa7-41d6-80a7-e08ef20ceed7
Repo: https://github.com/tknopp/NFFT.jl.git
Tree: b912f20e4a10045fca38685237b21c870f026b81

Registrator tree SHA: 8e1a5ac2695627143951512d700c7e3c445102ec
@JuliaRegistrator JuliaRegistrator force-pushed the registrator/abstractnffts/7f219486/v0.1.0 branch from 5e246ce to 1762a40 Compare January 2, 2022 13:57
JuliaRegistrator referenced this pull request in JuliaMath/NFFT.jl Jan 2, 2022
@JuliaRegistrator JuliaRegistrator temporarily deployed to stopwatch January 2, 2022 13:57 Inactive
@tknopp
Copy link
Contributor

tknopp commented Jan 2, 2022

[noblock] The naming distance is unavoidable. AbstractNFFTs is a sister package to AbstractFFTs but it targets the non equidistant FFT, which AbstractFFTs will not capture. The package AbstractNFFTs will allow NFFT.jl and NFFT3.jl to use a common interface.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants