-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 96
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix Sequence Labelling Models, fixes #178 #180
Conversation
The weights modified weights for POS is here. Ready for review. Travis tests pass for Julia 1.x |
@aviks Travis tests pass for Julia 1.0, but has compatibility issue for Tracker with Julia 0.7. What do you suggest me to do. |
We don't want to support 0.7. Only 1.0 and 1.3
…On Wed, 18 Dec 2019, 11:36 Ayush Kaushal, ***@***.***> wrote:
@aviks <https://github.com/aviks> Travis tests pass for Julia 1.0, but
has compatibility issue for Tracker with Julia 0.7. What do you suggest me
to do.
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#180?email_source=notifications&email_token=AAC4QJSU66R46QIQ5UUSTXDQZG4UBA5CNFSM4J2MG3RKYY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOEHE66UA#issuecomment-566882128>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAC4QJXOQYBB4QNKXCLXJYTQZG4UBANCNFSM4J2MG3RA>
.
|
So, should I send a separate PR updating travis and appveyor |
Yup
…On Wed, 18 Dec 2019, 12:25 Ayush Kaushal, ***@***.***> wrote:
So, should I send a separate PR updating travis and appveyor files?
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#180?email_source=notifications&email_token=AAC4QJQ54IR77NBGY4FCZJDQZHCNVA5CNFSM4J2MG3RKYY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOEHFB4GI#issuecomment-566894105>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAC4QJRLCCOMADQV3SFROFDQZHCNVANCNFSM4J2MG3RA>
.
|
…into export_remove
@Ayushk4 you should be able to upload the weights to the release on this repo and update the source. |
35d6961
to
67e2ec5
Compare
@aviks Thanks, I will do that once all the tests pass. |
67e2ec5
to
2ba0046
Compare
2ba0046
to
9b9ac81
Compare
Do you know why we've suddenly started to get these |
I am not sure. After merging the changes from #181 to this patch, all the tests were passing (except for 32-bit appveyor). But now they seem to be failing. This is the first time I have come across |
2be7441
to
3676cd3
Compare
NNLib.jl recently had a patch release. I can try restricting the version to before that. |
Yes, I was about to say, It's probably due to NNlib v0.6.1 |
611599e
to
905a871
Compare
@aviks Is there any way to test Julia 32-bit on my 64-bit system? These tests solely fail on 32-bit on the bson files that were saved in a 64-bit system. I want to separate an MWE and report it and/or find a workaround. |
Here's more on the 32-bit issue with BSON.jl- JuliaIO/BSON.jl#60 |
That is great debugging. Very cool, @Ayushk4 |
Thanks, I have filed a PR for the same. However, since it's holidays we could expect a delay in the review work. |
Mike Innes has merged the PR. Is there anyways we can test the CI with the master branch of BSON.jl? |
@Ayushk4 what is left on this one? |
I was waiting for JuliaIO/BSON.jl to have a new release with the fixes I made. I don't recall exactly what else is left. I will fix tomorrow. |
@Ayushk4 Bump? |
I will look into it this Sunday. |
…into export_remove
@aviks All models (NER, POS, sentiment and PerceptronTagger) work on 32-bit as well. |
ULMFiT tests are passing locally for me on 1.3.1, updated Manifest.toml. |
@aviks Please review. |
The new weights file for NER is here
Addresses #178