-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 422
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Finer grained permissions #101
Comments
Use-case exposed by @almet and @Natim :A collection has a schema. A formbuilder needs to read that schema to render the form. In order to read that collection object, we currently need to set Workaround: use two collections: one for the schema, one for the records. |
This means that you need to create a collection with a JSONSchema validator to validate that the schema you enter in the form list is valid. |
Today, when we give the
collection:write
permission it implies the right to share this collection to anyone.When you are logging in some application, you might want to refrain it to share your data.
A good way to do that is to explicitly ask for permission using scopes.
My proposal is to not give any permission with the
kinto
scope but to only allow permission to what defines in the scope:The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: