forked from bitcoin-inquisition/bitcoin
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Implement CTV_FLAG_DEDUCT_OUTPUT_AMOUNT
#2
Comments
bigspider
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 8, 2023
e4be0e9 test: add -maxtipage test for the maximum allowable value (James O'Beirne) a451e83 fix: validation: cast now() to seconds for maxtipage comparison (James O'Beirne) Pull request description: Since bitcoin@faf4487, the maxtipage comparison in IsInitialBlockDownload() has been broken, since the NodeClock::now() time_point is in the system's native denomination (nanoseconds). Without this patch, specifying the maximum allowable -maxtipage (9223372036854775807) results in a SIGABRT crash: ``` % gdb --args ./src/bitcoind -maxtipage=9223372036854775207 -minimumchainwork=0x00 -stopatheight=30000 ... 2022-11-09T15:55:17Z [dnsseed] dnsseed thread exit [Thread 0x7fff937fe640 (LWP 69883) exited] Thread 29 "b-msghand" received signal SIGABRT, Aborted. [Switching to Thread 0x7fff91ffb640 (LWP 69886)] __pthread_kill_implementation (threadid=<optimized out>, signo=signo@entry=6, no_tid=no_tid@entry=0) at ./nptl/pthread_kill.c:44 44 ./nptl/pthread_kill.c: No such file or directory. (gdb) bt #0 __pthread_kill_implementation (threadid=<optimized out>, signo=signo@entry=6, no_tid=no_tid@entry=0) at ./nptl/pthread_kill.c:44 #1 0x00007ffff768989f in __pthread_kill_internal (signo=6, threadid=<optimized out>) at ./nptl/pthread_kill.c:78 #2 0x00007ffff763da52 in __GI_raise (sig=sig@entry=6) at ../sysdeps/posix/raise.c:26 #3 0x00007ffff7628469 in __GI_abort () at ./stdlib/abort.c:79 bitcoin-inquisition#4 0x00007ffff7cf79a4 in __mulvdi3 () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgcc_s.so.1 bitcoin-inquisition#5 0x00005555558d13ab in std::chrono::__duration_cast_impl<std::chrono::duration<long, std::ratio<1l, 1000000000l> >, std::ratio<1000000000l, 1l>, long, false, true>::__cast<long, std::ratio<1l, 1l> > (__d=...) at /usr/include/c++/12/bits/chrono.h:521 bitcoin-inquisition#6 std::chrono::duration_cast<std::chrono::duration<long, std::ratio<1l, 1000000000l> >, long, std::ratio<1l, 1l> > (__d=...) at /usr/include/c++/12/bits/chrono.h:260 bitcoin-inquisition#7 std::chrono::duration<long, std::ratio<1l, 1000000000l> >::duration<long, std::ratio<1l, 1l>, void> (__d=..., this=<optimized out>) at /usr/include/c++/12/bits/chrono.h:514 bitcoin-inquisition#8 std::chrono::operator-<long, std::ratio<1l, 1000000000l>, long, std::ratio<1l, 1l> > (__rhs=..., __lhs=...) at /usr/include/c++/12/bits/chrono.h:650 bitcoin-inquisition#9 std::chrono::operator-<NodeClock, std::chrono::duration<long, std::ratio<1l, 1000000000l> >, long, std::ratio<1l, 1l> > (__rhs=..., __lhs=...) at /usr/include/c++/12/bits/chrono.h:1020 bitcoin-inquisition#10 Chainstate::IsInitialBlockDownload (this=0x555556071940) at ./src/validation.cpp:1545 bitcoin-inquisition#11 0x00005555556efd1e in operator() (__closure=<optimized out>) at ./src/net_processing.cpp:3369 bitcoin-inquisition#12 (anonymous namespace)::PeerManagerImpl::ProcessMessage (this=0x555556219be0, pfrom=..., msg_type=..., vRecv=..., time_received=..., interruptMsgProc=...) at ./src/net_processing.cpp:3369 bitcoin-inquisition#13 0x00005555556f75cc in (anonymous namespace)::PeerManagerImpl::ProcessMessages (this=0x555556219be0, pfrom=<optimized out>, interruptMsgProc=std::atomic<bool> = { false }) at ./src/net_processing.cpp:4985 bitcoin-inquisition#14 0x00005555556a83c9 in CConnman::ThreadMessageHandler (this=0x5555560ebc70) at ./src/net.cpp:2014 bitcoin-inquisition#15 0x0000555555c4d5d6 in std::function<void ()>::operator()() const (this=0x7fff91ffadb0) at /usr/include/c++/12/bits/std_function.h:591 bitcoin-inquisition#16 util::TraceThread(std::basic_string_view<char, std::char_traits<char> >, std::function<void ()>) ( thread_name="0\255\377\221\377\177\000\000\v\000\000\000\000\000\000\000TraceThread\000\000\000\000\000P\255\377\221\377\177\000\000\017\000\000\000\000\000\000\000util/thread.cpp\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000ihB鵿6\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\260\255\377\221\377\177\000\000\277\211\321UUU\000\000p\324\304UUU\000\000\002\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\240xh\367\377\177\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000]\340iUUU\000\000p\274\016VUU\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\300\303iUUU\000\000p\206jUUU", '\000' <repeats 11 times>, "ihB鵿6\200\251!VUU\000\000"..., thread_func=...) at util/thread.cpp:21 bitcoin-inquisition#17 0x000055555569e05d in std::__invoke_impl<void, void (*)(std::basic_string_view<char>, std::function<void()>), char const*, CConnman::Start(CScheduler&, const Options&)::<lambda()> > (__f=<optimized out>) at /usr/include/c++/12/bits/invoke.h:61 bitcoin-inquisition#18 std::__invoke<void (*)(std::basic_string_view<char>, std::function<void()>), char const*, CConnman::Start(CScheduler&, const Options&)::<lambda()> > (__fn=<optimized out>) at /usr/include/c++/12/bits/invoke.h:96 bitcoin-inquisition#19 std::thread::_Invoker<std::tuple<void (*)(std::basic_string_view<char, std::char_traits<char> >, std::function<void()>), char const*, CConnman::Start(CScheduler&, const Options&)::<lambda()> > >::_M_invoke<0, 1, 2> (this=<optimized out>) at /usr/include/c++/12/bits/std_thread.h:252 bitcoin-inquisition#20 std::thread::_Invoker<std::tuple<void (*)(std::basic_string_view<char, std::char_traits<char> >, std::function<void()>), char const*, CConnman::Start(CScheduler&, const Options&)::<lambda()> > >::operator() (this=<optimized out>) at /usr/include/c++/12/bits/std_thread.h:259 bitcoin-inquisition#21 std::thread::_State_impl<std::thread::_Invoker<std::tuple<void (*)(std::basic_string_view<char, std::char_traits<char> >, std::function<void()>), char const*, CConnman::Start(CScheduler&, const Options&)::<lambda()> > > >::_M_run(void) (this=<optimized out>) at /usr/include/c++/12/bits/std_thread.h:210 bitcoin-inquisition#22 0x00007ffff7ad43d3 in ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6 bitcoin-inquisition#23 0x00007ffff7687b27 in start_thread (arg=<optimized out>) at ./nptl/pthread_create.c:435 bitcoin-inquisition#24 0x00007ffff770a78c in clone3 () at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/clone3.S:81 (gdb) ``` ACKs for top commit: MarcoFalke: review ACK e4be0e9 🏽 Tree-SHA512: d892d6264a284d952a68a8631a6301277373b8df939dafd9e2652f2f22ab60712cde63b90c27c67ea2d05f02443452e3e4e1b9f25479bfaca00d4c4de13b9fbd
bigspider
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 8, 2023
05eeba2 [test] Add manual prune startup test case (dergoegge) 4517419 [util] Avoid integer overflow in CheckDiskSpace (dergoegge) Pull request description: Starting a fresh node with `-prune=1` causes an integer overflow to happen in `CheckDiskSpace` ([here](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/f7bdcfc83f5753349018be3b5a663c8923d1a5eb/src/init.cpp#L1633-L1648)) because `nPruneTarget` is to the max `uint64_t` value. ``` node1 stderr util/system.cpp:138:51: runtime error: unsigned integer overflow: 52428800 + 18446744073709551615 cannot be represented in type 'unsigned long' #0 0x564a482b5088 in CheckDiskSpace(fs::path const&, unsigned long) src/./src/util/system.cpp:138:51 #1 0x564a4728dc59 in AppInitMain(node::NodeContext&, interfaces::BlockAndHeaderTipInfo*) src/./src/init.cpp:1639:14 #2 0x564a47256e6a in AppInit(node::NodeContext&, int, char**) src/./src/bitcoind.cpp:221:43 #3 0x564a47256087 in main src/./src/bitcoind.cpp:265:13 bitcoin-inquisition#4 0x7fcb7cbffd8f (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x29d8f) (BuildId: 69389d485a9793dbe873f0ea2c93e02efaa9aa3d) bitcoin-inquisition#5 0x7fcb7cbffe3f in __libc_start_main (/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6+0x29e3f) (BuildId: 69389d485a9793dbe873f0ea2c93e02efaa9aa3d) bitcoin-inquisition#6 0x564a471957f4 in _start (/tmp/cirrus-ci-build/ci/scratch/build/bitcoin-x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/src/bitcoind+0xca07f4) (BuildId: 035cb22302d37317a630900a15a26ecb326d395c) SUMMARY: UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer: unsigned-integer-overflow util/system.cpp:138:51 in ``` I think side stepping the overflow for this specific case, is better than adding an exception to the UB suppresions file. ACKs for top commit: MarcoFalke: ACK 05eeba2 🥝 john-moffett: ACK 05eeba2 Tree-SHA512: 1d8e6bcb49818139f04b5ab2cbef7f9b422bf0c38a804cd532b6bd0ba4c4fd07f959ba977e59896343f213086c8ecc48180f50d006638dc84649c66ec379d58a
This was implemented. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Idea: add a new flag to the current specs for
OP_CHECKCONTRACTVERIFY
used with outputs (so withoutCCV_FLAG_CHECK_INPUT
):Currently, there are only two possible behaviors defined for CCV for an output (that is, the when
CCV_FLAG_CHECK_INPUT
is not in theflags
):CCV_FLAG_IGNORE_OUTPUT_AMOUNT
: no check on the amountCCV_FLAG_IGNORE_OUTPUT_AMOUNT
), the output' s amount must be at least equal to their sumWe can make the opcode more flexible by adding an additional flag:
CCV_DEDUCT_OUTPUT_AMOUNT = 4
(incompatible withCCV_FLAG_IGNORE_OUTPUT_AMOUNT
).If present, then:
OP_CHECKCONTRACTVERIFY
are performed in the same script.To be defined: should the deducted amount persist across inputs, or only stored during the current input's evaluation? It does not seem to matter for the use cases I have in mind (vaults and CoinPools unilateral exits), so it might suffice to keep the semantics simpler and per-input.
Vaults
OP_VAULT allows to instantly "revault" part of the input amounts, so that it is available for spending without waiting for the timelock.
The current vault implementation here does not support this feature.
CCV_DEDUCT_OUTPUT_AMOUNT
allows to implement this missing feature, allowing CCV-based vaults that are a drop-in replacement for OP_VAULT.CoinPools
In protocols like CoinPools, it is necessary that a party is able to unilaterally withdraw from the pool, by subtracting their balance from the UTXO.
CCV_DEDUCT_OUTPUT_AMOUNT
would allow to support this use cases without worrying about 64-bit arithmetics in Script.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: