Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix dynamic field indexer #7131

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jan 4, 2023

Conversation

tnowacki
Copy link
Contributor

@tnowacki tnowacki commented Jan 4, 2023

Fix incorrect checking of object IDs for dynamic fields

@tnowacki tnowacki requested review from patrickkuo and 666lcz January 4, 2023 20:20
@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Jan 4, 2023

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

2 Ignored Deployments
Name Status Preview Comments Updated
explorer-storybook ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Jan 4, 2023 at 10:34PM (UTC)
wallet-adapter ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Jan 4, 2023 at 10:34PM (UTC)

…field value can be both object and value, which don't always have a id.
@sblackshear
Copy link
Collaborator

This LGTM but it would be great to have unit tests for some of these trickier sui-types functions

@patrickkuo patrickkuo merged commit 54b65af into MystenLabs:releases/sui-v0.20.0-release Jan 4, 2023
@patrickkuo
Copy link
Contributor

This LGTM but it would be great to have unit tests for some of these trickier sui-types functions

I will add more unit test in the cherrypick PR

patrickkuo added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 4, 2023
Fix incorrect checking of object IDs for dynamic fields

Co-authored-by: patrick <[email protected]>
patrickkuo added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 5, 2023
Fix incorrect checking of object IDs for dynamic fields

Co-authored-by: patrick <[email protected]>
@tnowacki tnowacki deleted the fix-20 branch March 31, 2023 20:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants