-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Taxonomic Spine for botany #1
Comments
Estimated work days: 5 WD |
Update: Botanical Taxonomy from Christian Lange & Olof is still an outstanding issue (they have been contacted) |
I consider this item finished. It was completed 10-06-2022. |
To prevent further confusion of terms, I suggest we call this, the compendium of taxa (restricted to botany for now), the actual Taxonomic Spine. Of course this is supposed to be the source of taxon names residing in the digitization app's local database. I noticed that the latter is often referred to as "taxonomic spine", which makes no sense to me and I'd like to keep these concepts separate. I will rename tickets accordingly. |
I renamed this ticket and edited the description for clarity. Removed the requirement for synonyms. These will be dealt with later and separate tickets ought to be created for this and hybrids. |
Reopening as @PipBrewer discovered some issues with the taxon spine that needs investigation. |
I am investigating the missing names that Kim highlighted in mail from 29-08-2022. |
The number of missing names turned out to be 12,641 total. |
Issue
Creation of the first taxonomic spine for Vascular Plants.
The Taxonomic Spine is the canonical taxon list drawn from both Specify and authoritative checklists,
including synonyms, so that 99% of taxa we will come across will be in the there.Basic requirements:
Missing taxon records are in the shared drive:
N:\SCI-SNM-DigitalCollections\DaSSCo\missing_names_botany_august2022.xlsx
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: