Gb/skill

[grantbuster]

No description provided.

[grantbuster]

@bnb32 can you think of any other common skill test metrics we should add?

Here's an example of a high-complexity skill evaluation. Not sure how much value all of this adds... https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2022JD036659

and an example of a simple evaluation: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969721056576

I would really like to just present bias and KS test statistic, especially since we're going to be looking at more variables than other studies.

[bnb32]

@bnb32 can you think of any other common skill test metrics we should add?
No I think this is plenty of coverage. Looks good. Is the plan to compare various non bias corrected GCM data performance against wtk?

[bnb32]

Straightforward. Looks good.

[grantbuster]

@bnb32 can you think of any other common skill test metrics we should add?
No I think this is plenty of coverage. Looks good. Is the plan to compare various non bias corrected GCM data performance against wtk?

Yep the idea is to document 1) which GCMs have the best historical skill and 2) the variety of inter-model projected changes. This PR is just for 1. The goal is to do this for all power system variables (this has been done all over for T/Pr but not for wind+solar+humidity) to inform which GCMs we look at.