Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Updated Sup3rX access patterns - keys can be either features or numpy style indexing but not both #235

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Oct 24, 2024

Conversation

bnb32
Copy link
Collaborator

@bnb32 bnb32 commented Oct 22, 2024

No description provided.

@bnb32 bnb32 marked this pull request as draft October 22, 2024 22:28
bnb32 added 5 commits October 23, 2024 13:13
…er feature names or numpy style indices, but not both. All instances of ``ds[feature, id0, id1, ...]`` changed to ``ds[feature][id0, id1, ...]``. Features cannot be retrieved by index, only by name, and providing only dimension indices ``(ds[id0,id1,...])`` returns an array with trailing feature channel and spatiotemporal shape matching indices.
@bnb32 bnb32 requested a review from grantbuster October 24, 2024 00:17
@bnb32 bnb32 marked this pull request as ready for review October 24, 2024 00:17
@bnb32 bnb32 changed the title Added error catch on integer indexing of features Updated Sup3rX access patterns - keys can be either features or numpy style indexing but not both Oct 24, 2024
@bnb32 bnb32 merged commit cfddcfe into bnb/dh_refactor Oct 24, 2024
10 checks passed
@bnb32 bnb32 deleted the bnb/updated_indexing branch October 24, 2024 15:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants