Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

4.x #339

Closed
wants to merge 126 commits into from
Closed

4.x #339

wants to merge 126 commits into from

Conversation

radicalProjects
Copy link

No description provided.

adriancole and others added 30 commits August 22, 2013 18:31
…r masking fields; remove map from known types except rdata.
…rectionalPoolRecord and addDirectionalPoolRecord latency.
Adrian Cole and others added 27 commits March 6, 2015 21:23
UltraDNS provider was failing on ttl update of a round-robin rrset of
type A or AAAA. The error code was 20000. This changes implementation
to use a different api when updating pooled records.
DiscoveryDNS is not ready to be released as it has not been live tested.
This commit can be reverted once the above is false.

see #288
DynECT occasionally sends back the wrong http status on incomplete. This
change ensures the request is retried even if the status was 200.

closes #261
hashCode and equals were out-of-sync for ResourceRecordSet. This
distracted me, when looking at #319. This fixes that.
Logic in add/remove was complex and buggy. This fixes that and backfills
tests.

closes #269
Formerly, the CLI list command was broken and inconsistent. This change
ensures the all record api is used for lists.

closes #259
This fixes a CLI bug which passed anonymous crendentials to route53 as
opposed to allowing it to implicitly lookup from IAM.

closes #255
Per advice from @quinncomendant, puts a space between formats so that
columns don't collide in list output. Adds tests for each boundary.

closes #267
@cloudbees-pull-request-builder

NetflixOSS » denominator » denominator-pull-requests #82 FAILURE
Looks like there's a problem with this pull request

@codefromthecrypt
Copy link
Contributor

I'm assuming this was a mistake

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants