fix: autoconf-2.13

[luochen1990]

Motivation for this change

Find a typo.

Things done

Fixed the typo from nativebuildInputs into nativeBuildInputs, but it also works without nativeBuildInputs = [ xz ];, so we might delete this dependency as well.

• Built on platform(s)
  • x86_64-linux
  • aarch64-linux
  • x86_64-darwin
  • aarch64-darwin
• For non-Linux: Is sandbox = true set in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
• Tested, as applicable:
  • NixOS test(s) (look inside nixos/tests)
  • and/or package tests
  • or, for functions and "core" functionality, tests in lib/tests or pkgs/test
  • made sure NixOS tests are linked to the relevant packages
• Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
• Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
• 22.05 Release Notes (or backporting 21.11 Release notes)
  • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
  • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
  • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
  • (Release notes changes) Ran nixos/doc/manual/md-to-db.sh to update generated release notes
• Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

[siraben]

Result of nixpkgs-review pr 156656 run on aarch64-darwin 1

1 package built:

• autoconf213

[siraben]

This should go into staging.

[c0bw3b]

I will squash-merge this to make it one single commit with a commit message following nixpkgs manual.

[c0bw3b]

Thanks for raising this @luochen1990

[siraben]

Can xz be removed as a dependency altogether?

[luochen1990]

@siraben I tried to remove xz and it build successfully, but I'm not sure whether there is any different with the output.

[c0bw3b]

I did the same test. xz is unused during the build and there is no reference to xz or lzma in all the binaries/scripts it produces.

I made a PR to remove it (linked above).