bbin: init at 0.1.4

[Sohalt]

Description of changes

Things done

• Built on platform(s)
  • x86_64-linux
  • aarch64-linux
  • x86_64-darwin
  • aarch64-darwin
• For non-Linux: Is sandbox = true set in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
• Tested, as applicable:
  • NixOS test(s) (look inside nixos/tests)
  • and/or package tests
  • or, for functions and "core" functionality, tests in lib/tests or pkgs/test
  • made sure NixOS tests are linked to the relevant packages
• Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
• Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
• 22.11 Release Notes (or backporting 22.05 Release notes)
  • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
  • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
  • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
  • (Release notes changes) Ran nixos/doc/manual/md-to-db.sh to update generated release notes
• Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

[AndersonTorres]

Otherwise lgtm

[Sohalt]

Thanks @AndersonTorres for the review! I addressed all your points.
However I currently get

24:   ["bb" "--deps-root" script-root "--config" (str tmp-edn)
25:         script-main-opts-first script-main-opts-second
26:         "--"])
27: 
28: (process/exec (into base-command *command-line-args*))
    ^--- exec is not supported in non-GraalVM environments

when trying to execute a script installed with bbin.
Not entirely sure what's going on there, since babashka is using GraalVM.
Maybe some of the babashka maintainers know more? cc @BAndresen @bhougland @DerGuteMoritz @jlesquembre @thiagokokada

[Sohalt]

Ok, the issue is that the check for whether process/exec is supported, happens at compile time and nixpkgs uses the babashka-standalone.jar from the babashka-releases, which used to be built with AdoptOpenJDK (it's built with GraalVM since babashka/babashka@a5dec07). So this should work without changes to this PR as soon as the next version gets released and packaged for nixpkgs.

[AndersonTorres]

So you need a new babashka in order to your package works?

[Sohalt]

Exactly.

[Sohalt]

Should work now with the newer babashka in nixpkgs.