ppsspp: 1.1.0 -> 1.3

[therealpxc]

Motivation for this change

new upstream release

Things done

• Tested using sandboxing
  (nix.useSandbox on NixOS,
  or option build-use-sandbox in nix.conf
  on non-NixOS)
• Built on platform(s)
  • NixOS
  • macOS
  • Linux
• Tested compilation of all pkgs that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nox --run "nox-review wip"
• Tested execution of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
• Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

---

[mention-bot]

@therealpxc, thanks for your PR! By analyzing the history of the files in this pull request, we identified @AndersonTorres, @abbradar and @Fuuzetsu to be potential reviewers.

[therealpxc]

attn @ndowens

this is my resubmit of the old PR for the same thing

[ndowens]

On the maintainers field you can do
maintainers = with maintainers; [ name1 name 2]; since there are more than one maintainers. But other than that looks good

[therealpxc]

Cleaned up the maintainers field as you suggested. :-)

[Fuuzetsu]

Does it work? IIRC some old version of ppsspp started to segfault straight away on me (hence why it was in 1.0 for ages)

[therealpxc]

Yes, it does work. I logged many hours with this version (on NixOS 16.09) a couple months ago. I don't have time to do the same kind of ‘testing’ right now for master or NixOS 17.03, but I encourage you to give it a try and let me know if there are any problems on your end. I don't expect the one you've described, although I have experienced occasional segfaults in the middle of use (not enough to get me to throw my controller in frustration or anything, I mean like once or twice over the course of a few days with hours of play on each).

I can confirm that it does not segfault on startup, though. I tested that far last night with this very branch. The GUI opens and looks and behaves like it's supposed to.

[therealpxc]

Can I ask what's going on with Travis CI, btw? It seems like literally every time I view a NixOS PR, it says the build has failed. What's up with that?

[ndowens]

It has been having issues. I can't explain why, but lately it is normal

…

On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 9:25 PM, Patrick Callahan ***@***.***> wrote: Can I ask what's going on with Travis CI, btw? It seems like literally every time I view a NixOS PR, it says the build has failed. What's up with that? — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#24272 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAHL7wT1NTIr7ok72wcqdLC6srAL7_AEks5rpHsvgaJpZM4MnqUO> .

[joachifm]

Darwin build fails https://travis-ci.org/NixOS/nixpkgs/jobs/214740202, is that expected? If nobody cares to fix it, perhaps darwin should be removed from platforms.

[AndersonTorres]

It's better to exclude it. Well, I don't know the specific status of Darwin on NixOS/Nixpkgs, then I think it is better to not put so much worry trying to port anything to it (at least for now).

[therealpxc]

I would try my hand at it, but I don't own a Mac and I am (for the next few weeks at least) still a student, so I'm not about to buy one. I think it's cool that in principle Nix is cross-platform, so if I had some money it would be different. So I agree with the consensus that for now we should drop it, pending any volunteers on the OS X side.

[AndersonTorres]

About it, I am thinking about work the FreeBSD and BSDs in general about cross-platform and portability issues. But I need more time management in my real life issues.

[therealpxc]

@AndersonTorres I feel personally attacked by this relatable content 😉