persepolis: ZHF: fix build and runtime errors on darwin

[iFreilicht]

Description of changes

This fixes the build and runtime errors on darwin as part of #265948.

Things done

• Fixed the build of the package on darwin
• Tried to start the binary, this failed at first
• Fixed the startup with additional patches
  • Disabled notifications on darwin as they relied on pyobjc, which is not currently in nixpkgs
• Tested basic functionality, found the package has an implicit dependency on ffmpeg
• Added ffmpeg as well
• Added myself to the maintainers list
• Added myself as the maintainer as this package is currently orphaned and I know a little bit about how it works and is built now
• Replaced abandoned youtube-dl with maintained fork yt-dlp to restore video finder functionality (this was broken on Linux and Darwin)
• Tested everything once more;
  • Downloaded a small video successfully as well as random files off of github and wikipedia

• Built on platform(s)
  • x86_64-linux
  • aarch64-linux
  • x86_64-darwin
  • aarch64-darwin
• For non-Linux: Is sandboxing enabled in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
  • sandbox = relaxed
  • sandbox = true
• Tested, as applicable:
  • NixOS test(s) (look inside nixos/tests)
  • and/or package tests
  • or, for functions and "core" functionality, tests in lib/tests or pkgs/test
  • made sure NixOS tests are linked to the relevant packages
• Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
• Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
• 23.11 Release Notes (or backporting 23.05 Release notes)
  • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
  • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
  • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
• Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

[nixos-discourse]

This pull request has been mentioned on NixOS Discourse. There might be relevant details there:

https://discourse.nixos.org/t/should-i-fix-a-bug-within-nixpkgs-if-upstream-wont/35127/1

[pbsds]

Great work! I don't have darwin so i can't test nor review, but I do have some input reading through the diff.

[pbsds]

Seems like #266670 got ahead of us. Could you rebase it on top of master an unmark it broken?

[wegank]

@ofborg build persepolis persepolis.passthru.tests