Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

zfs_unstable: 2.2.3-unstable-2024-04-09 → 2.2.3-unstable-2024-04-12 #304174

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

toastal
Copy link
Contributor

@toastal toastal commented Apr 15, 2024

Description of changes

Things done

  • Built on platform(s)
    • x86_64-linux
    • aarch64-linux
    • x86_64-darwin
    • aarch64-darwin
  • For non-Linux: Is sandboxing enabled in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
    • sandbox = relaxed
    • sandbox = true
  • Tested, as applicable:
  • Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
  • Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • 24.05 Release Notes (or backporting 23.05 and 23.11 Release notes)
    • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
    • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
    • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.

1

Footnotes

  1. Please consider giving up MS GitHub or offering a non-proprietary, non-US-corporate-controlled mirror for this free software project.
    I wish to delete this Microsoft account in the future, but I need more projects like this to support alternative methods to send patches & contribute.

@ofborg ofborg bot added 10.rebuild-darwin: 0 This PR does not cause any packages to rebuild on Darwin 10.rebuild-linux: 11-100 labels Apr 15, 2024
@adamcstephens
Copy link
Contributor

Do you want to add yourself as a maintainer for zfs unstable?

@toastal
Copy link
Contributor Author

toastal commented Apr 15, 2024 via email

@toastal toastal force-pushed the zfs-2.1.13-unstable-2024-04-12 branch 3 times, most recently from c7d14b8 to 22691d9 Compare April 20, 2024 08:09
@toastal toastal force-pushed the zfs-2.1.13-unstable-2024-04-12 branch from 22691d9 to 6f5c34c Compare April 20, 2024 08:13
@toastal
Copy link
Contributor Author

toastal commented May 5, 2024

closed by #308642

@toastal toastal closed this May 5, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
10.rebuild-darwin: 0 This PR does not cause any packages to rebuild on Darwin 10.rebuild-linux: 11-100
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants