Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

owncloud-client: 5.3.1 -> 5.3.2 #378553

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 2, 2025

Conversation

hellwolf
Copy link
Contributor

@hellwolf hellwolf commented Feb 1, 2025

Things done

  • Built on platform(s)
    • x86_64-linux
    • aarch64-linux
    • x86_64-darwin
    • aarch64-darwin
  • For non-Linux: Is sandboxing enabled in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
    • sandbox = relaxed
    • sandbox = true
  • Tested, as applicable:
  • Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
  • Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • 25.05 Release Notes (or backporting 24.11 and 25.05 Release notes)
    • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
    • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
    • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.

@hellwolf hellwolf marked this pull request as ready for review February 1, 2025 14:09
@github-actions github-actions bot added 10.rebuild-darwin: 0 This PR does not cause any packages to rebuild on Darwin 10.rebuild-linux: 1 10.rebuild-linux: 1-10 labels Feb 1, 2025
@nix-owners nix-owners bot requested a review from qknight February 1, 2025 14:16
@nixos-discourse
Copy link

This pull request has been mentioned on NixOS Discourse. There might be relevant details there:

https://discourse.nixos.org/t/prs-ready-for-review/3032/5160

Comment on lines 7 to 6
qt6,
qt6Packages,
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can we only use one of those?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yes, I changed all to use qt6Packages.

Comment on lines +9 to +11
# nativeBuildInputs
pkg-config,
cmake,
extra-cmake-modules,
qt6,
qt6Packages,
# buildInputs
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We don't really need those comments.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

hmm, I'd keep them. I had another reviewer to explicitly ask me to keep these tidy and segmented. To whatever the convention, or lack of, I'd rather stick to it now. :)

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sure whatever but there is no convention and I am way to lazy to maintain them so I usually nuke them

@hellwolf hellwolf force-pushed the owncloud-client-v5.3.2 branch from 8ade41a to a9c69c0 Compare February 1, 2025 22:20
@SuperSandro2000 SuperSandro2000 merged commit 75c8548 into NixOS:master Feb 2, 2025
25 of 27 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
10.rebuild-darwin: 0 This PR does not cause any packages to rebuild on Darwin 10.rebuild-linux: 1-10 10.rebuild-linux: 1
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants