-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 696
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add support for transitive NoWarn properties from project references #1642
Closed
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
19 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
e3e150f
temp status
e25192e
working through merging warning properties
dbb4e78
Adding better quality across and changing tests
3512c8a
checkpoint for correctly extracting transitive no warn from a basic case
5bac353
Checkpoint with a functional case (A->B->C->Pkg) and lazy initialization
7b06260
Adding code to deal with path exclusion logic and fixing test breaks
32dd874
making TransitiveNoWarnUtils conditional on projectspec and restoreme…
b41d9d3
Adding scenario tests
d2d095a
addressing some PR feedback
aff0915
Addressing warning properties related PR feedback
fd2954d
Addressing feedback on TransitiveNoWarnUtil
2bb5484
Adding unit tests for TransitiveNoWarnUtils
bac6ebd
Adding more unit tests
206783d
Adding unit tests related to Merging warning properties and dependenc…
2aca4d5
Improving perf by fixing seen set handling
288abda
Adding func tests with dense solution
b2610a1
removing warnAsError from merge
6f725f7
fixing tests to match the perf changes
1697f19
Reducung visible propertites in restore collector logger
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why does this method not match Equals? They should both check the same things.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This seems acceptable as per the requirements on HashCode -
Ref - https://stackoverflow.com/questions/19710028/what-to-return-when-overriding-object-gethashcode-in-classes-with-no-immutable