-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add missing 1.0 spec examples #110
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
validating this fixture results in a warning because v1
is missing a message
(edit: and user
). Given that this is based on an example from the spec, I wonder if it's worth updating the example to include a message. Otherwise, should this fixture be moved warn-objects
?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I agree, moved:
./ocfl-validate.py fixtures/1.0/warn-objects/W007_spec-ex-diff-paths
[W007a] OCFL Object root inventory v1 version block SHOULD include a message key (see https://ocfl.io/1.0/spec/#W007)
[W007b] OCFL Object root inventory v1 version block SHOULD include a user key (see https://ocfl.io/1.0/spec/#W007)
OCFL v1.0 Object at fixtures/1.0/warn-objects/W007_spec-ex-diff-paths is VALID
Thanks @srerickson ! Have moved both into |
We have spec-ex-full but not other examples in the 1.0 spec. This PR adds the first and third examples.