Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

detect: allow rule which need both directions to match #11561

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

catenacyber
Copy link
Contributor

Link to redmine ticket:
https://redmine.openinfosecfoundation.org/issues/5665

Describe changes:

  • allows bidirectional signature matching !

SV_BRANCH=OISF/suricata-verify#1922

#11530 with needed rebase after DOH2 and review taken into account

Ticket: 5665

This is done with `alert ip any any => any any`
The => operator means that we will need both directions
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 26, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 89.75610% with 21 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 82.53%. Comparing base (7f6c963) to head (d62a9ab).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master   #11561      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   82.51%   82.53%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         923      923              
  Lines      248732   248879     +147     
==========================================
+ Hits       205232   205402     +170     
+ Misses      43500    43477      -23     
Flag Coverage Δ
fuzzcorpus 60.62% <56.09%> (+0.22%) ⬆️
livemode 18.77% <9.26%> (+0.14%) ⬆️
pcap 43.29% <45.36%> (-0.79%) ⬇️
suricata-verify 61.80% <85.85%> (+0.04%) ⬆️
unittests 59.05% <52.19%> (-0.02%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

@suricata-qa
Copy link

Information: QA ran without warnings.

Pipeline 21718

@catenacyber
Copy link
Contributor Author

Rebased in #11578

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants