Sync mirror/list/dataset/code component with enterprise

[Yiling-J]

What is this feature?

Sync mirror/list/dataset/code component with enterprise

Why do we need this feature?

[Add a description of the problem the feature is trying to solve.]

Who is this feature for?

[Add information on what kind of user the feature is for.]

Which issue(s) does this PR fix?:

Fixes #

Special notes for your reviewer:

MR Summary:

The summary is added by @codegpt.

The Merge Request synchronizes the mirror/list/dataset/code component with the enterprise version. It introduces several updates across multiple files, focusing on enhancing functionality, fixing bugs, and improving code quality. Key changes include the addition of new features, updates to existing functions, and the introduction of tests to ensure reliability and performance.

Key updates:

1. Implemented new features and enhancements in the mirror component, including creating push mirrors for finished tasks and handling mirror repositories.
2. Updated the repository component to support file operations (create, update, delete) and manage repository-related actions more efficiently.
3. Enhanced the dataset and code components with new functionalities and improved existing processes.
4. Introduced comprehensive tests for the mirror, repository, dataset, and code components to ensure functionality works as expected and to catch any potential issues early.
5. Made several bug fixes and performance improvements across different components to enhance stability and efficiency.

[starship-github]

Linter Issue Report

During the code review, a list issues were found. These issues could affect the code quality, maintainability, and consistency. Below is the detailed Linter issue report:

builder/store/database/mirror.go

Lint Issue: undefined: Repository

• Location: Line 347, Column 96
• Code Context:

  _, err = tx.NewUpdate().Model(repo).WherePK().Exec(ctx)

• Actionable Suggestion: It appears that the Repository type is not defined within the scope of this file or imported packages. Please ensure that you have defined the Repository type within the appropriate package or imported it correctly. If the Repository type is defined in another package, make sure to import that package at the top of your Go file. For example, if Repository is defined in a package named repo, you should have an import statement like import "path/to/repo" at the beginning of your file.

---

Please make the suggested changes to improve the code quality.

[pulltheflower]

LGTM

[starship-github]

Possible Issues And Suggestions:

• component/mirror_test.go

  • Comments:
    • The use of context.TODO() in tests should be replaced with context.Background() if there's no intention to replace it with a real context later, for clarity.
  • Suggestions:

    ctx := context.Background();
    

• component/mirror_test.go

  • Comments:
    • The test 'TestMirrorComponent_CreateMirrorRepo' does not assert the effects of 'gitea' boolean flag on the 'CreateMirrorRepo' behavior. Consider adding assertions to verify the behavior changes when 'gitea' is true.

• Line 676 in component/mirror.go

  • Comments:
    • The 'Statistics' method implementation is missing error handling for the case when 'statusCounts' is nil or empty, which could lead to incorrect statistics being returned.
  • Suggestions:

    if statusCounts == nil || len(statusCounts) == 0 {
        return nil, errors.New("no status counts available")
    }
    

• Line 139 in common/types/mirror.go

  • Comments:
    • Adding 'MirrorStatusCount' struct without usage in the provided diffs. Ensure it's used or remove if unnecessary.

• Line 44 in common/types/dataset.go

  • Comments:
    • Addition of 'SensitiveCheckStatus' field without JSON struct tag options might expose sensitive data.
  • Suggestions:

    SensitiveCheckStatus string `json:"sensitive_check_status,omitempty"`
    

• Line 42 in common/types/code.go

  • Comments:
    • 'SensitiveCheckStatus' field added without omitting it when empty, potentially exposing sensitive defaults.
  • Suggestions:

    SensitiveCheckStatus string `json:"sensitive_check_status,omitempty"`
    

• component/list.go

  • Comments:
    • The error logging format string uses '%v' but does not use fmt.Sprintf for formatting.
  • Suggestions:

    slog.Error("error listing models by path", "error", err, "paths", req.Paths)
    

• component/list.go

  • Comments:
    • The error logging format string uses '%v' but does not use fmt.Sprintf for formatting.
  • Suggestions:

    slog.Error("error listing datasets by path", "error", err, "paths", req.Paths)
    

• component/repo.go

  • Comments:
    • The variable 'ossFileExpire' is used but not defined in the provided diff. This could lead to a runtime error if the variable is not defined elsewhere in the code.

• Line 100 in builder/store/database/mirror.go

  • Comments:
    • The change in the WHERE clause from 'git_path' to 'path' and addition of 'repository_type' in 'IsRepoExist' method might alter the behavior if not properly accounted for in the rest of the codebase.

MR Evaluation:

This feature is still under test, evaluation are given by AI and might be inaccurate.

After evaluation, the code changes in the Merge Request get score: 98-100.

Tips

CodeReview Commands (invoked as MR or PR comments)

• @codegpt /review to trigger an code review.
• @codegpt /evaluate to trigger code evaluation process.
• @codegpt /describe to regenerate the summary of the MR.
• @codegpt /secscan to scan security vulnerabilities for the MR or the Repository.
• @codegpt /help to get help.

CodeReview Discussion Chat

There are 2 ways to chat with Starship CodeReview:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by StarShip.
  Example:
  • @codegpt How to fix this bug?
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab):
  Tag @codegpt in a new review comment at the desired location with your query.
  Examples:
  • @codegpt generate unit testing code for this code snippet.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window.
It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks.
For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the MR/PR comments.

CodeReview Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation
  for detailed information on how to use Starship CodeReview.

About Us:

Visit the OpenCSG StarShip website for the Dashboard and detailed information on CodeReview, CodeGen, and other StarShip modules.

[SeanHH86]

lgtm

[ganisback]

LGTM

[starship-github]

The StarShip CodeReviewer was triggered but terminated because it encountered an issue: The MR state is not opened.

Tips

CodeReview Commands (invoked as MR or PR comments)

• @codegpt /review to trigger an code review.
• @codegpt /evaluate to trigger code evaluation process.
• @codegpt /describe to regenerate the summary of the MR.
• @codegpt /secscan to scan security vulnerabilities for the MR or the Repository.
• @codegpt /help to get help.

CodeReview Discussion Chat

There are 2 ways to chat with Starship CodeReview:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by StarShip.
  Example:
  • @codegpt How to fix this bug?
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab):
  Tag @codegpt in a new review comment at the desired location with your query.
  Examples:
  • @codegpt generate unit testing code for this code snippet.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window.
It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks.
For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the MR/PR comments.

CodeReview Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation
  for detailed information on how to use Starship CodeReview.