Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Complete the unit tests for model components #859

Merged
merged 13 commits into from
Dec 19, 2024
Merged

Conversation

jialudev
Copy link
Collaborator

@jialudev jialudev commented Dec 17, 2024

What this PR does:
Complete the unit tests for model components

Fixes #

Type of changes
Please delete options that are not relevant.

  • unit test

Feature/Issue validation/testing:

Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes and relevant result summary.

  • Test A

  • Test B

  • Logs

Special notes for your reviewer:

Checklist:

  • I have added unit/e2e tests that prove your fix is effective or that this feature works.
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas.
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation.
  • I have reviewed my own code and ensured that it follows the project's style guidelines.

Release note:


MR Summary:

The summary is added by @codegpt.

This Merge Request focuses on completing the unit tests for model components in a Vue.js frontend environment. Key updates include:

  1. Enhancing the test setup by integrating additional plugins and global components such as ElementPlus, Vue I18n, Pinia, and ElementPlusIconsVue.
  2. Adding comprehensive unit tests for ModelRelationsCard, ModelSettings, NewModel, and a widget QuestionAnswer to ensure components mount correctly, validate form inputs, handle submissions, and perform inference tests.
  3. Adjusting the Vitest configuration to inline dependencies for element-plus, vue-i18n, and pinia to support the new test setup.

These changes aim to improve the reliability and maintainability of the model components by ensuring they are thoroughly tested.

@jialudev jialudev requested review from zhendi and hiveer December 17, 2024 11:03
@jialudev jialudev self-assigned this Dec 17, 2024
@starship-github
Copy link

MR Evaluation:

This feature is still under test, evaluation are given by AI and might be inaccurate.

After evaluation, the code changes in the Merge Request get score: 100.

Tips

CodeReview Commands (invoked as MR or PR comments)

  • @codegpt /review to trigger an code review.
  • @codegpt /evaluate to trigger code evaluation process.
  • @codegpt /describe to regenerate the summary of the MR.
  • @codegpt /secscan to scan security vulnerabilities for the MR or the Repository.
  • @codegpt /help to get help.

CodeReview Discussion Chat

There are 2 ways to chat with Starship CodeReview:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by StarShip.
    Example:
    • @codegpt How to fix this bug?
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab):
    Tag @codegpt in a new review comment at the desired location with your query.
    Examples:
    • @codegpt generate unit testing code for this code snippet.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window.
It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks.
For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the MR/PR comments.

CodeReview Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation
    for detailed information on how to use Starship CodeReview.

About Us:

Visit the OpenCSG StarShip website for the Dashboard and detailed information on CodeReview, CodeGen, and other StarShip modules.

zhendi
zhendi previously approved these changes Dec 18, 2024
Copy link
Collaborator

@zhendi zhendi left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

zhendi
zhendi previously approved these changes Dec 19, 2024
Copy link
Collaborator

@zhendi zhendi left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Copy link
Collaborator

@zhendi zhendi left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@zhendi zhendi merged commit 0580c19 into main Dec 19, 2024
3 checks passed
@zhendi zhendi deleted the csghub__ut-vue-models branch December 19, 2024 07:37
@starship-github
Copy link

The StarShip CodeReviewer was triggered but terminated because it encountered an issue: The MR state is not opened.

Tips

CodeReview Commands (invoked as MR or PR comments)

  • @codegpt /review to trigger an code review.
  • @codegpt /evaluate to trigger code evaluation process.
  • @codegpt /describe to regenerate the summary of the MR.
  • @codegpt /secscan to scan security vulnerabilities for the MR or the Repository.
  • @codegpt /help to get help.

CodeReview Discussion Chat

There are 2 ways to chat with Starship CodeReview:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by StarShip.
    Example:
    • @codegpt How to fix this bug?
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab):
    Tag @codegpt in a new review comment at the desired location with your query.
    Examples:
    • @codegpt generate unit testing code for this code snippet.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window.
It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks.
For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the MR/PR comments.

CodeReview Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation
    for detailed information on how to use Starship CodeReview.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants