Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: add missing ghostscript package #86

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

rannmann
Copy link

@rannmann rannmann commented Mar 3, 2025

What's changed?

Added missing ghostscript package to container build. This fixes an issue where uploaded PDFs failed to parse.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hello @rannmann, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

Summary of Changes

This pull request addresses an issue where uploaded PDFs were failing to parse. To resolve this, I've added the missing ghostscript package to the container build. The change involves modifying the Containerfile to include ghostscript during the package installation step.

Highlights

  • Bug Fix: Fixes an issue where uploaded PDFs failed to parse due to a missing dependency.
  • Dependency Update: Adds the ghostscript package to the container image.
  • Containerfile Modification: The Containerfile is updated to include the installation of the ghostscript package.

Changelog

  • Containerfile
    • Added ghostscript to the list of packages installed via apk add.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.


Trivia time!

What company originally developed the PostScript page description language, which is closely related to PDF?

Click here for the answer
Adobe Systems developed PostScript.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request adds the missing ghostscript package to the container build, resolving an issue where PDF uploads were failing. The change is straightforward and addresses the reported problem.

Merge Readiness

The pull request appears to be a simple and effective fix for the reported issue. Given the straightforward nature of the change and the resolution of the PDF parsing problem, the pull request seems ready for merging. However, as I am unable to directly approve the pull request, I recommend that other reviewers also examine the change before merging. Since there are no CRITICAL or HIGH severity issues, it can be merged after another review.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant