Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

JDQL update and delete with record entity, and omitted select clause returning different type #28339

Conversation

njr-11
Copy link
Contributor

@njr-11 njr-11 commented May 3, 2024

JDQL with UPDATE and DELETE clauses for record entities.
Also, allow the SELECT clause to be omitted when the method returns a different type, allowing records to be returned.

@njr-11
Copy link
Contributor Author

njr-11 commented May 3, 2024

#build

@LibbyBot
Copy link

LibbyBot commented May 3, 2024

Code analysis and actions

DO NOT DELETE THIS COMMENT.
  • 6 product code files were changed.

  • Please describe in a separate comment how you tested your changes.

  • 4 FAT files were changed, added, or removed.

  • Check that the build did not break the affected FAT suite(s).

@LibbyBot
Copy link

LibbyBot commented May 3, 2024

Your personal build request is at https://wasrtc.hursley.ibm.com:9443/jazz/resource/itemOid/com.ibm.team.build.BuildResult/_HfrewAliEe-9IeXbkm35aA

Target locations of links might be accessible only to IBM employees.

@LibbyBot
Copy link

LibbyBot commented May 3, 2024

Your personal build request is at https://libh-proxy1.fyre.ibm.com/cognitive/pipelineAnalysis.html?uuid=c0604488-2ab5-47d3-87d1-28f90024c8ea

Target locations of links might be accessible only to IBM employees.

@LibbyBot
Copy link

LibbyBot commented May 4, 2024

@LibbyBot
Copy link

LibbyBot commented May 4, 2024

The build njr-11-28339-20240503-0939
https://wasrtc.hursley.ibm.com:9443/jazz/resource/itemOid/com.ibm.team.build.BuildResult/_HfrewAliEe-9IeXbkm35aA
completed successfully!

@njr-11 njr-11 merged commit 0c892b3 into OpenLiberty:integration May 4, 2024
3 of 4 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants