-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 44
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
scripts: make all scripts that need it use realpath #9590
Conversation
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## dev #9590 +/- ##
============================================
- Coverage 42.50% 42.49% -0.01%
Complexity 2271 2271
============================================
Files 1311 1311
Lines 105413 105413
Branches 3297 3297
============================================
- Hits 44806 44799 -7
- Misses 58661 58668 +7
Partials 1946 1946
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
There are two more I think:
|
05430b9
to
c01af83
Compare
You're right, I'm reversing this PR to match the scripts popular vote |
c01af83
to
b266467
Compare
The upside of this approach (grabbing the script's directory) is that scripts can be run from anywhere and still work fine. (It's still a bit fragile because |
Indeed which is why I naturally tend to err on the other side. But the most important part imo is to be consistent. I'm a bit conflicted about the various compose scripts. Should they keep the docker-compose behavior of using the working directory (or any parent), or should they support being run from anywhere? |
Signed-off-by: Younes Khoudli <[email protected]>
12c8d02
to
aef57ea
Compare
No description provided.