Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix:license tests #6

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 15, 2024
Merged

fix:license tests #6

merged 2 commits into from
Oct 15, 2024

Conversation

JarbasAl
Copy link
Member

@JarbasAl JarbasAl commented Oct 15, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Enhanced clarity and detail in the README.md file.
    • Updated project description to specify the use of the FANN library.
    • Renamed "Getting Started" to "Direct Usage" for practical implementation focus.
    • Introduced a new "License" section detailing licensing implications.
  • Chores
    • Modified workflow configuration for license tests, including package exclusions and corrected indentation for execution flow.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 15, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces modifications to both the workflow configuration for license tests and the README.md file. In the workflow, the exclude parameter in the Check python step has been updated to include the fann2 package alongside tqdm, and indentation in the Print report step has been corrected. The README.md has been enhanced for clarity, specifying the use of the FANN library in the neural network intent parser, renaming sections for better focus, and adding a new "License" section to clarify licensing implications.

Changes

File Change Summary
.github/workflows/license_tests.yml Updated exclude parameter to include fann2 package; corrected indentation in Print report step.
README.md Enhanced project description to include FANN library; renamed "Getting Started" to "Direct Usage"; restructured example usage; added "License" section regarding licensing implications.

Poem

In the garden where code does bloom,
Changes sprout, dispelling gloom.
With FANN's might, our parser's bright,
License checks now feel just right.
A README clear, for all to see,
Hop along, come code with me! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions github-actions bot added fix and removed fix labels Oct 15, 2024
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
README.md (1)

58-62: Excellent addition of License information with minor suggestions

The new License section is a crucial addition to the README, providing important information about the project's licensing and its dependencies. This transparency is valuable for users and contributors.

Consider the following minor grammatical improvements:

  1. In the sentence starting with "It is licensed...", consider separating "however" with a semicolon or starting a new sentence:

    -It is licensed under the Apache 2 license, however it depends on fann2 which is licensed under the LGPL.
    +It is licensed under the Apache 2 license; however, it depends on fann2 which is licensed under the LGPL.

    or

    -It is licensed under the Apache 2 license, however it depends on fann2 which is licensed under the LGPL.
    +It is licensed under the Apache 2 license. However, it depends on fann2 which is licensed under the LGPL.
  2. Consider adding a comma after "fann2":

    -It is licensed under the Apache 2 license, however it depends on fann2 which is licensed under the LGPL.
    +It is licensed under the Apache 2 license, however it depends on fann2, which is licensed under the LGPL.
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[typographical] ~62-~62: The word “however” is an adverb that can’t be used like a conjunction, and therefore needs to be separated from the sentence.
Context: ...t is licensed under the Apache 2 license, however it depends on fann2 which is licensed u...

(HOWEVER_SENTENCE)


[uncategorized] ~62-~62: A comma might be missing here.
Context: ...Apache 2 license, however it depends on fann2 which is licensed under the LGPL. [Why ...

(AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_PUNCTUATION_COMMA)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 91c221d and 6411b0a.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • .github/workflows/license_tests.yml (1 hunks)
  • README.md (3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
README.md

[typographical] ~62-~62: The word “however” is an adverb that can’t be used like a conjunction, and therefore needs to be separated from the sentence.
Context: ...t is licensed under the Apache 2 license, however it depends on fann2 which is licensed u...

(HOWEVER_SENTENCE)


[uncategorized] ~62-~62: A comma might be missing here.
Context: ...Apache 2 license, however it depends on fann2 which is licensed under the LGPL. [Why ...

(AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_PUNCTUATION_COMMA)

🔇 Additional comments (4)
.github/workflows/license_tests.yml (1)

40-40: Approved change, but clarification needed on 'fann2' exclusion

The modification to exclude 'fann2' from the license check aligns with the PR objective to fix license tests. However, could you please clarify why 'fann2' needs to be excluded?

To ensure this change doesn't have unintended consequences, let's verify the licensing information for 'fann2':

Additionally, consider adding a comment in the workflow file explaining why 'fann2' is being excluded from the license check. This will help future maintainers understand the reasoning behind this decision.

README.md (3)

4-4: LGTM: Improved project description

The addition of information about the FANN library and the link to its repository enhances the clarity of the project description. This change helps users understand the underlying technology powering the neural network intent parser.


39-39: LGTM: Improved section heading

The change from "Getting Started" to "Direct Usage" better reflects the content of this section, which provides a practical code example. This adjustment improves the document's structure and makes it easier for users to find implementation details.


Line range hint 1-62: LGTM: Overall improvements to README.md

The changes to README.md have significantly enhanced the document's clarity, structure, and informativeness. Key improvements include:

  1. More detailed project description with reference to the FANN library.
  2. Better section organization with the "Direct Usage" heading.
  3. Addition of crucial licensing information.

These updates align well with the PR objective of addressing license-related matters and provide users with clearer, more comprehensive documentation.

🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint

10-10: Expected: 0; Actual: 1
Unordered list indentation

(MD007, ul-indent)

@JarbasAl JarbasAl merged commit f5f31be into dev Oct 15, 2024
4 checks passed
@JarbasAl JarbasAl deleted the license_tests branch October 15, 2024 00:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant