-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix:license tests #6
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces modifications to both the workflow configuration for license tests and the Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
README.md (1)
58-62
: Excellent addition of License information with minor suggestionsThe new License section is a crucial addition to the README, providing important information about the project's licensing and its dependencies. This transparency is valuable for users and contributors.
Consider the following minor grammatical improvements:
In the sentence starting with "It is licensed...", consider separating "however" with a semicolon or starting a new sentence:
-It is licensed under the Apache 2 license, however it depends on fann2 which is licensed under the LGPL. +It is licensed under the Apache 2 license; however, it depends on fann2 which is licensed under the LGPL.or
-It is licensed under the Apache 2 license, however it depends on fann2 which is licensed under the LGPL. +It is licensed under the Apache 2 license. However, it depends on fann2 which is licensed under the LGPL.Consider adding a comma after "fann2":
-It is licensed under the Apache 2 license, however it depends on fann2 which is licensed under the LGPL. +It is licensed under the Apache 2 license, however it depends on fann2, which is licensed under the LGPL.🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[typographical] ~62-~62: The word “however” is an adverb that can’t be used like a conjunction, and therefore needs to be separated from the sentence.
Context: ...t is licensed under the Apache 2 license, however it depends on fann2 which is licensed u...(HOWEVER_SENTENCE)
[uncategorized] ~62-~62: A comma might be missing here.
Context: ...Apache 2 license, however it depends on fann2 which is licensed under the LGPL. [Why ...(AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_PUNCTUATION_COMMA)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- .github/workflows/license_tests.yml (1 hunks)
- README.md (3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
README.md
[typographical] ~62-~62: The word “however” is an adverb that can’t be used like a conjunction, and therefore needs to be separated from the sentence.
Context: ...t is licensed under the Apache 2 license, however it depends on fann2 which is licensed u...(HOWEVER_SENTENCE)
[uncategorized] ~62-~62: A comma might be missing here.
Context: ...Apache 2 license, however it depends on fann2 which is licensed under the LGPL. [Why ...(AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_PUNCTUATION_COMMA)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
.github/workflows/license_tests.yml (1)
40-40
: Approved change, but clarification needed on 'fann2' exclusionThe modification to exclude 'fann2' from the license check aligns with the PR objective to fix license tests. However, could you please clarify why 'fann2' needs to be excluded?
To ensure this change doesn't have unintended consequences, let's verify the licensing information for 'fann2':
Additionally, consider adding a comment in the workflow file explaining why 'fann2' is being excluded from the license check. This will help future maintainers understand the reasoning behind this decision.
README.md (3)
4-4
: LGTM: Improved project descriptionThe addition of information about the FANN library and the link to its repository enhances the clarity of the project description. This change helps users understand the underlying technology powering the neural network intent parser.
39-39
: LGTM: Improved section headingThe change from "Getting Started" to "Direct Usage" better reflects the content of this section, which provides a practical code example. This adjustment improves the document's structure and makes it easier for users to find implementation details.
Line range hint
1-62
: LGTM: Overall improvements to README.mdThe changes to README.md have significantly enhanced the document's clarity, structure, and informativeness. Key improvements include:
- More detailed project description with reference to the FANN library.
- Better section organization with the "Direct Usage" heading.
- Addition of crucial licensing information.
These updates align well with the PR objective of addressing license-related matters and provide users with clearer, more comprehensive documentation.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint
10-10: Expected: 0; Actual: 1
Unordered list indentation(MD007, ul-indent)
Summary by CodeRabbit