Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Phylogenetic Tree #2428

Open
Sveta-user opened this issue Feb 25, 2022 · 6 comments
Open

Phylogenetic Tree #2428

Sveta-user opened this issue Feb 25, 2022 · 6 comments

Comments

@Sveta-user
Copy link

Greetings -
I've started 4 phylogenetic trees in the morning today, Feb 24th (10 hours ago) . One of them worked well and fast, but 3 others are not done still. Is it possible to find out why they are not working? Is there anything wrong with specific genomes in these trees?
Will really appreciate your advice!

@mshukla1
Copy link

mshukla1 commented Feb 25, 2022 via email

@Sveta-user
Copy link
Author

Still running - since 11 am

@Sveta-user
Copy link
Author

Hi Maulik! Thank you for looking into this. I found a way to check if the genomes were a problem. I just ran the same trees with much smaller number of core genes (100 instead of 500) - and all 3 trees finished successfully. So good news: (i) Tree service works ; (ii) all my genomes are acceptable by this service. It just takes longer . Case closed ;))

@ARWattam
Copy link

Sveta, you can also use the protein family sorter to examine your group. Load them in, using the PGFams, and then click perfect protein families.
Screen Shot 2022-02-25 at 8 43 56 AM
Screen Shot 2022-02-25 at 8 43 45 AM

This will tell you how many protein families can be used with your particular group. If you don't have any, or have too few, you can use the Allow deletions or Allow duplications functions.

You can check out this video that shows you how to do it:
https://docs.patricbrc.org/videos/phylogenetic_codon_tree.html#codon6

Rebecca

@olsonanl
Copy link

Just wanted to note the original set of trees did finish after 17 hours:

image

@Sveta-user
Copy link
Author

Greeting! Many thanks for all your advice. All 4 trees worked. I should have been more patient :) Sorry for bothering you . I know Patric Tree service takes time (and is worth the wait). But this time 1 of 4 trees finished in less than a hour. so I assumed that you guys must have recently upgraded the Tree tool, made it faster, but in the process the old problem with including private genomes in trees came back . Glad that was not the case. Thanks again!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants