-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Read aggregated Embrace Plus and Nowatch data #20
Conversation
# omitting NAs: TBD | ||
# the Embrace Plus aggregated files have a lot of NAs, | ||
# for example when the device wasn't able to record anything | ||
# we need to decide how to handle these NAs | ||
eda_filt <- process_eda(na.omit(data$EDA)) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
As you know I'm no expert when it comes to analysing this data, but thebutter_lowpass_filter
doesn't work the same as it does with other devices when there are a lot of NAs. The aggregated Embrace Plus data also has "data" present when the device wasn't worn. When I removed the NAs the flow seemed to work fine again, but would be good to double check what the implications are
@PCdLf some initial functionality to work with aggregated Embrace Plus data, and aggregated Nowatch data.
As discussed, this is still using zip files, but we can change that easily in a next PR.
For testing (I have
wearables
in the same folder aswearalyze
, make sure paths are correct):