-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 198
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Disable gps heading for UBX driver in RTK float fix type #104
Merged
bkueng
merged 5 commits into
PX4:master
from
JonasPerolini:diable-gps-heading-rtk-float
Apr 19, 2022
Merged
Changes from 4 commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -2036,8 +2036,15 @@ GPSDriverUBX::payloadRxDone() | |
float rel_length_acc = _buf.payload_rx_nav_relposned.accLength * 1e-2f; | ||
bool heading_valid = _buf.payload_rx_nav_relposned.flags & (1 << 8); | ||
bool rel_pos_valid = _buf.payload_rx_nav_relposned.flags & (1 << 2); | ||
bool carrier_solution_fixed = _buf.payload_rx_nav_relposned.flags & (1 << 4); | ||
(void)rel_length_acc; | ||
|
||
// RTK float fix type is not accurate enough | ||
if (!carrier_solution_fixed) | ||
{ | ||
heading_valid = false; | ||
} | ||
|
||
if (heading_valid && rel_pos_valid && rel_length < 1000.f) { // validity & sanity checks | ||
heading *= M_PI_F / 180.0f; // deg to rad, now in range [0, 2pi] | ||
heading -= _heading_offset; // range: [-pi, 3pi] | ||
|
@@ -2097,6 +2104,11 @@ GPSDriverUBX::payloadRxDone() | |
gps_rel.heading_valid = _buf.payload_rx_nav_relposned.flags & (1 << 8); | ||
gps_rel.relative_position_normalized = _buf.payload_rx_nav_relposned.flags & (1 << 9); | ||
|
||
if (!gps_rel.carrier_solution_fixed) | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I would drop this for now, at the moment we're just passing on the "heading_valid" flag as reported in NAV-RELPOSNED. For the heading field in |
||
{ | ||
gps_rel.heading_valid = false; | ||
} | ||
|
||
gotRelativePositionMessage(gps_rel); | ||
} | ||
|
||
|
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Instead of depending on the fix_type being set I would directly check the
carrier_solution_floating
flag in NAV-RELPOSNED here.See the carrier_solution_floating and carrier_solution_fixed handling below.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I've updated the code, please let me know if this is what you meant @dagar
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would roll carrier_solution_fixed right into the conditional below, but otherwise this looks good.