Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Added page for MAVLink traffic avoidance #527

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Jan 30, 2020

Conversation

AmeliaEScott
Copy link
Contributor

Added page describing the functionality added in PX4/PX4-Autopilot#12452.

@@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
# Air Traffic Avoidance: MAVLink
Copy link
Collaborator

@hamishwillee hamishwillee Jul 17, 2019

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We probably want to be more specific, because both ADSB and UTM come into PX4 as MAVLink messages - Air Traffic Avoidance: MAVLink UAS Traffic Management (UTM)

But let's just hold this as an open issue until we know more about UTM

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I updated to just be UTM.

Copy link
Collaborator

@hamishwillee hamishwillee left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks really good ... as far as it goes.

To complete this we need to explain how a UTM system is supposed to work (by comparison with the ADSB docs I know that I will get the messages from an ADSB transponder, which in turn gets them from light aircaft).

That should cover both how the messages get into the system, and presumably, how/what is used to broadcast them.

@bkueng @julianoes Do you know/can you recommend someone to explain how a UTM avoidance system works? What is supposed to send these messages - e.g. Is there a UTM transponder device? Is it that all UAVs in an area are supposed to set up a mavlink network to share their position with each other?

Copy link
Member

@LorenzMeier LorenzMeier left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I will work with you through this when I’m back. It needs a whiteboard session.

@hamishwillee
Copy link
Collaborator

@ItsTimmy I assume Lorenz means he'll work you through it :-). Suggest you take a photo of that whiteboard. Probably you don't need me there too, but if you decide you do, early mornings my time are best.

@hamishwillee
Copy link
Collaborator

@ItsTimmy @LorenzMeier Did you get a chance to have a whiteboard session about UTM "how it should work"? #527 (review)

@hamishwillee
Copy link
Collaborator

@ItsTimmy @LorenzMeier Did you get a chance to have a whiteboard session about UTM "how it should work".
All the work we did on this is rotting. WOuld be good to close it down.

@hamishwillee hamishwillee dismissed LorenzMeier’s stale review January 30, 2020 01:02

Because this is never going to happen

@hamishwillee
Copy link
Collaborator

Merging. More work can be done, but this is still useful.

@hamishwillee hamishwillee merged commit a7ae5bc into PX4:master Jan 30, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants