Refactor: src/screens/Leaderboard from Jest to Vitest #2694
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request focuses on refactoring the test suite for the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related issues
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: .coderabbit.yaml 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🧰 Additional context used📓 Learnings (1)📓 Common learnings🔇 Additional comments (5)src/screens/Leaderboard/Leaderboard.spec.tsx (5)
The
The JSDoc comment provides comprehensive documentation of test scenarios, mock setups, and key test cases. This documentation will be valuable for maintaining and understanding the test suite.
The test setup has been properly migrated:
Also applies to: 96-96
All test cases have been consistently migrated to use Vitest's mocking pattern:
Also applies to: 124-124, 133-133, 164-164, 185-185, 208-208, 229-229, 250-250, 267-267, 282-282, 292-292 Line range hint Let's verify that no Jest references remain in the codebase: ✅ Verification successfulMigration to Vitest is complete and correct The verification confirms that:
🏁 Scripts executedThe following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: #!/bin/bash
# Search for any remaining Jest references in the file
rg -i "jest\." "src/screens/Leaderboard/Leaderboard.spec.tsx"
# Search for any potentially missed Jest imports
rg -i "from ['|\"]@?jest" "src/screens/Leaderboard/Leaderboard.spec.tsx"
Length of output: 136 Script: #!/bin/bash
# Search for any test-related imports and assertions to verify complete migration
rg -i "import.*test" "src/screens/Leaderboard/Leaderboard.spec.tsx"
# Look for any expect statements to verify testing framework
rg "expect\(" "src/screens/Leaderboard/Leaderboard.spec.tsx"
# Check for any testing-related functions or methods
rg -i "describe|it|test|beforeAll|afterAll|mock" "src/screens/Leaderboard/Leaderboard.spec.tsx"
# Search for any remaining testing framework references
rg -i "@testing-library|vitest|jest" "src/screens/Leaderboard/Leaderboard.spec.tsx"
Length of output: 7994 Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop-postgres #2694 +/- ##
====================================================
- Coverage 86.10% 86.07% -0.03%
====================================================
Files 295 312 +17
Lines 7259 8134 +875
Branches 1591 1785 +194
====================================================
+ Hits 6250 7001 +751
- Misses 781 962 +181
+ Partials 228 171 -57 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
|
can you review it please ? @varshith257 |
palisadoes
merged commit 651aa71
into
PalisadoesFoundation:develop-postgres
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Migrated tests for Leaderboard component from Jest to Vitest. Updated test framework and adjusted test implementations accordingly. All tests now use Vitest for consistent testing environment and improved performance.
Issue Number:
Fixes #2553
Did you add tests for your changes?
yes
Snapshots/Videos:
Summary by CodeRabbit