Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Refactor CSS in src/components/EventManagement/EventAttendance/EventStatistics.tsx #2993

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 28, 2024

Conversation

mohamedrehan1
Copy link

@mohamedrehan1 mohamedrehan1 commented Dec 28, 2024

What kind of change does this PR introduce?
This PR will Refactor CSS files in src/components/EventManagement/EventAttendance/EventStatistics.tsx

Issue Number:
Fixes #2903

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?

NO

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Style
    • Enhanced styling for the Event Attendance Statistics Modal
    • Added new CSS module classes for improved layout and positioning
    • Introduced utility classes for padding and text styling
    • Replaced inline styles with modular CSS approach

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 28, 2024

Walkthrough

This pull request focuses on refactoring the CSS in the EventStatistics.tsx component by moving inline and component-specific styles to the global CSS module app.module.css. The changes involve updating the styling approach for the AttendanceStatisticsModal component, leveraging CSS modules to improve maintainability and consistency. New CSS classes are added to the global stylesheet to support the component's layout and styling requirements.

Changes

File Change Summary
src/components/EventManagement/EventAttendance/EventStatistics.tsx Imported CSS module styles and replaced inline/standard class names with module-specific classes
src/style/app.module.css Added new CSS classes for .attendance-modal, including positioning, border, padding, and text styling classes

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Refactor CSS in EventStatistics.tsx [#2903]
Move embedded CSS to global file
Improve UI/UX for color-blind users Requires further review of color contrast

Possibly related issues

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • palisadoes

Poem

🐰 Styling rabbit hops with glee,
CSS modules, now clean and free!
No more inline styles so wild,
Global classes, neatly filed.
Refactoring magic, hop-hop-hooray! 🎨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

Our Pull Request Approval Process

Thanks for contributing!

Testing Your Code

Remember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:

  1. We don't merge PRs with poor code quality.
    1. Follow coding best practices such that CodeRabbit.ai approves your PR.
  2. We don't merge PRs with failed tests.
    1. When tests fail, click on the Details link to learn more.
    2. Write sufficient tests for your changes (CodeCov Patch Test). Your testing level must be better than the target threshold of the repository
    3. Tests may fail if you edit sensitive files. Ask to add the ignore-sensitive-files-pr label if the edits are necessary.
  3. We cannot merge PRs with conflicting files. These must be fixed.

Our policies make our code better.

Reviewers

Do not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
When your PR has been assigned reviewers contact them to get your code reviewed and approved via:

  1. comments in this PR or
  2. our slack channel

Reviewing Your Code

Your reviewer(s) will have the following roles:

  1. arbitrators of future discussions with other contributors about the validity of your changes
  2. point of contact for evaluating the validity of your work
  3. person who verifies matching issues by others that should be closed.
  4. person who gives general guidance in fixing your tests

CONTRIBUTING.md

Read our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:

  1. PRs with issues not assigned to you will be closed by the reviewer
  2. Fix the first comment in the PR so that each issue listed automatically closes

Other

  1. 🎯 Please be considerate of our volunteers' time. Contacting the person who assigned the reviewers is not advised unless they ask for your input. Do not @ the person who did the assignment otherwise.
  2. Read the CONTRIBUTING.md file make

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
src/style/app.module.css (4)

3427-3429: Use theme variables instead of hardcoded green
For .borderRightGreen, prefer referencing a theme variable or SCSS variable to maintain color consistency across the codebase.


3447-3452: Corner radius consistency
.topLeftCorner uses an 8px radius, while .bottomRightCorner uses 12px. Ensure consistent radius values if the design requires uniform corners.


3453-3456: Misleading name vs. declared style
.largeBoldText declares font-weight: 400, which is not truly bold. Consider renaming it to avoid confusion.


3460-3462: Another padding utility
.paddingBottom2Rem is clear; confirm you’re following a consistent spacing scale across the codebase.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c5a3000 and 01c67a2.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • src/components/EventManagement/EventAttendance/EventStatistics.tsx (4 hunks)
  • src/style/app.module.css (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (14)
src/components/EventManagement/EventAttendance/EventStatistics.tsx (10)

33-33: Use of CSS module for improved maintainability
This import of styles from app.module.css is a good move for ensuring style encapsulation and maintainability. No issues found here.


380-380: Verify Bootstrap utility class usage
The className includes align-baseline, which is not a standard Bootstrap utility. Double-check if you meant align-items-baseline or if this is a custom class.


385-385: Confirm border-right utility class
border-right-1 is not a native Bootstrap utility class. Confirm whether this is a custom class or if you should use a valid Bootstrap utility (e.g., border-end).


390-390: Padding utility usage
Applying the .paddingBottom30 utility class is acceptable and helps keep your layout consistent.


393-393: Width utility check
Using w-30 may conflict with Bootstrap’s predefined width classes like w-25, w-50, etc. Confirm this is intentional or a custom utility.


398-398: Spacing utility alignment
.paddingBottom2Rem is consistent with the custom spacing approach. Ensure you remain consistent across the codebase for uniform spacing.


450-450: Repeating border-right utility
Same concern as line 385. Confirm if border-right-1 is native or custom.


452-452: Potentially conflicting font weights
.largeBoldText sets font-weight: 400, while font-weight-bold from Bootstrap implies heavier weight. Ensure you maintain clarity regarding the intended font weight.


456-456: Usage of .bottomRightCorner
This class is a straightforward approach to decorative corner styling. Looks good.


515-515: Usage of .topLeftCorner
Same pattern as .bottomRightCorner. No issues found.

src/style/app.module.css (4)

3430-3434: Confirm modal stacking
.positionedTopRight sets a z-index: 1. Verify that this will not conflict with Bootstrap modals, which can typically have higher stacking contexts.


3435-3440: Absolute positioning with corner radius
.topRightCorner is straightforward. Just ensure it doesn’t overlap with the close button in the modal’s header.


3441-3446: Bottom corner rounding
.bottomRightCorner is consistent with the rest of the corner styling approach. Looks good.


3457-3459: Utility class for bottom padding
Using .paddingBottom30 is acceptable. Just keep consistent naming conventions for spacing utilities.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 28, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 88.91%. Comparing base (43f2c61) to head (01c67a2).
Report is 9 commits behind head on develop-postgres.

Additional details and impacted files
@@                  Coverage Diff                  @@
##           develop-postgres    #2993       +/-   ##
=====================================================
+ Coverage             38.68%   88.91%   +50.23%     
=====================================================
  Files                   299      320       +21     
  Lines                  7427     8290      +863     
  Branches               1624     1869      +245     
=====================================================
+ Hits                   2873     7371     +4498     
+ Misses                 4337      696     -3641     
- Partials                217      223        +6     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@palisadoes palisadoes merged commit 21687ee into PalisadoesFoundation:develop-postgres Dec 28, 2024
14 checks passed
@mohamedrehan1 mohamedrehan1 deleted the dev branch January 1, 2025 09:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants