Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Refactored the CSS from a subdirectory to a global CSS file #3017

Closed

Conversation

harshk-89
Copy link

@harshk-89 harshk-89 commented Dec 29, 2024

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

feature
Issue Number:

Fixes #2514

Did you add tests for your changes?

yes

Snapshots/Videos:

WhatsApp Image 2024-12-29 at 05 44 56_6004fb8a

If relevant, did you update the documentation?

No
Summary

The motivation for this change is to improve styling consistency and maintainability by migrating CSS from OrganizationEvents to app.module.css. This resolves issues of style duplication and promotes a unified design. More details can be found in issue #2514(#2514).

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?

NO, It just moving CSS from a subdirectory to a global file.

Other information

This pull request migrates the CSS from OrganizationEvents to the global CSS file app.module.css. In this pull request, I attempted to use the existing CSS from app.module.css in the .tsx files within the OrganizationEvents directory. If I added new CSS, I aimed to utilize the existing colors from app.module.css to maintain design consistency.

Have you read the contributing guide?

yes

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Style Changes

    • Updated styling for the Organization Events screen.
    • Introduced new CSS classes for event-related components.
    • Migrated styles from a dedicated module to a centralized application stylesheet.
  • Refactor

    • Consolidated CSS styling approach with updated class names.
    • Updated import paths for styling resources.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 29, 2024

Walkthrough

This pull request focuses on refactoring the CSS styling for the Organization Events screen. The changes involve removing the OrganizationEvents.module.css file and updating the styling references in the OrganizationEvents.tsx component to use the global app.module.css file. Two new CSS classes, .justifyspEvents and .CreateButtonEvents, were added to the global CSS file to maintain the existing styling while consolidating the CSS into a single, centralized location.

Changes

File Change Summary
src/screens/OrganizationEvents/OrganizationEvents.module.css Deleted entirely
src/screens/OrganizationEvents/OrganizationEvents.tsx Updated CSS import to use ../../style/app.module.css and modified class names to reference new global styles
src/style/app.module.css Added two new CSS classes: .justifyspEvents and .CreateButtonEvents

Possibly related issues

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

ignore-sensitive-files-pr

Suggested reviewers

  • palisadoes

Poem

🐰 CSS styles hopping free,
From module to global, can't you see?
One file to rule them all with grace,
Refactoring with a bunny's embrace!
Streamlined code, no more CSS maze! 🎨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

Our Pull Request Approval Process

Thanks for contributing!

Testing Your Code

Remember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:

  1. We don't merge PRs with poor code quality.
    1. Follow coding best practices such that CodeRabbit.ai approves your PR.
  2. We don't merge PRs with failed tests.
    1. When tests fail, click on the Details link to learn more.
    2. Write sufficient tests for your changes (CodeCov Patch Test). Your testing level must be better than the target threshold of the repository
    3. Tests may fail if you edit sensitive files. Ask to add the ignore-sensitive-files-pr label if the edits are necessary.
  3. We cannot merge PRs with conflicting files. These must be fixed.

Our policies make our code better.

Reviewers

Do not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
When your PR has been assigned reviewers contact them to get your code reviewed and approved via:

  1. comments in this PR or
  2. our slack channel

Reviewing Your Code

Your reviewer(s) will have the following roles:

  1. arbitrators of future discussions with other contributors about the validity of your changes
  2. point of contact for evaluating the validity of your work
  3. person who verifies matching issues by others that should be closed.
  4. person who gives general guidance in fixing your tests

CONTRIBUTING.md

Read our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:

  1. PRs with issues not assigned to you will be closed by the reviewer
  2. Fix the first comment in the PR so that each issue listed automatically closes

Other

  1. 🎯 Please be considerate of our volunteers' time. Contacting the person who assigned the reviewers is not advised unless they ask for your input. Do not @ the person who did the assignment otherwise.
  2. Read the CONTRIBUTING.md file make

coderabbitai[bot]
coderabbitai bot previously approved these changes Dec 29, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 29, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 88.95%. Comparing base (0973ad2) to head (e34fa19).
Report is 2 commits behind head on develop-postgres.

Additional details and impacted files
@@                  Coverage Diff                  @@
##           develop-postgres    #3017       +/-   ##
=====================================================
+ Coverage             29.27%   88.95%   +59.67%     
=====================================================
  Files                   300      321       +21     
  Lines                  7546     8409      +863     
  Branches               1646     1894      +248     
=====================================================
+ Hits                   2209     7480     +5271     
+ Misses                 5154      686     -4468     
- Partials                183      243       +60     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

cursor: pointer;
transition: background-color 0.3s;
display: inline-flex;
justify-content: center;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

  1. Why was this section deleted?
  2. Do references to these elements still exist in the code base?

@palisadoes
Copy link
Contributor

Please get code rabbit to approve your PR

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/style/app.module.css (1)

3765-3787: Consider following kebab-case naming convention and optimizing hover styles.

  1. The class name uses PascalCase which doesn't follow CSS naming conventions. Consider using kebab-case instead.
  2. The hover state border color is redundant as it's the same as the normal state.

Consider applying these improvements:

-.CreateButtonEvents {
+.create-button-events {
   background-color: var(--search-button-bg);
   color: black;
   margin: 1rem 0 0;
   margin-top: 15px;
   padding: 10px 10px;
   border-radius: 5px;
   font-size: 16px;
   outline: none;
   font-weight: 600;
   cursor: pointer;
   transition:
     transform 0.2s,
     box-shadow 0.2s;
   width: 100%;
   border: 1px solid var(--dropdown-border-color);
 }

-.CreateButtonEvents:hover {
+.create-button-events:hover {
   background-color: var(--blue-bg-color);
   color: black;
-  border: 1px solid var(--dropdown-border-color);
 }
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between bbfd27b and e34fa19.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/style/app.module.css (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/style/app.module.css (1)

3760-3763: LGTM! The justifyspEvents class looks good.

The class implementation is clean and follows the component-specific naming pattern.

@palisadoes
Copy link
Contributor

Please fix the conflicting file

@harshk-89
Copy link
Author

Please fix the conflicting file

Actually, there are two issues addressing the same problem: issue #2888 (#2888) and issue #2514 (#2514). The pull request for issue #2888 has already been merged. Should I override the changes while resolving the merge conflict?

@palisadoes
Copy link
Contributor

  1. We should close this PR and the issue. It doesn't make sense duplicating the work.
  2. We try not to have duplicate issues, we made an error here

@palisadoes palisadoes closed this Dec 29, 2024
@harshk-89 harshk-89 deleted the issue2514 branch December 29, 2024 11:23
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why did you removed these css ? Weren't they being used in components ?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants