Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature/ux improvements #3091

Merged

Conversation

Abhi-MS
Copy link

@Abhi-MS Abhi-MS commented Jan 27, 2025

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

Update the https://docs-api.talawa.io/ homepage to a minimal design. Removed unnecessary files and styles. Ensured Rensponsiveness. Fixed sidebar styles.

Issue Number:

Fixes #2951

Snapshots/Videos:

Talawa.API.mp4

If relevant, did you update the documentation?

Not relevant.

Summary
Improved ui/ux of Talawa API docs website.

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?

No

Checklist

CodeRabbit AI Review

  • I have reviewed and addressed all critical issues flagged by CodeRabbit AI
  • I have implemented or provided justification for each non-critical suggestion
  • I have documented my reasoning in the PR comments where CodeRabbit AI suggestions were not implemented

Test Coverage

  • I have written tests for all new changes/features
  • I have verified that test coverage meets or exceeds 95%
  • I have run the test suite locally and all tests pass

Other information

Have you read the contributing guide?

Yes

Summary by CodeRabbit

Release Notes

  • Documentation Updates

    • Simplified homepage design
    • Removed multiple feature panels and components
    • Updated navigation and footer configuration
  • Styling Changes

    • Refined CSS styles and color variables
    • Adjusted responsive design for various screen sizes
    • Removed media queries and simplified layout
  • Branding

    • Updated copyright statement to reflect new organization name
    • Modified GitHub repository link in call-to-action button
  • Removed Components

    • Deleted several layout and utility components
    • Removed homepage animations
    • Eliminated text content modules

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 27, 2025

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@Abhi-MS has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 7 minutes and 14 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between eb81114 and 2fbab76.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • docs/src/css/index.css (7 hunks)

Walkthrough

This pull request involves a comprehensive restructuring of the Talawa documentation website, specifically the Docusaurus configuration and frontend components. The changes primarily focus on simplifying the homepage, removing multiple panel components, updating navigation and styling, and aligning the documentation site with a more minimal design approach. The modifications affect the site's structure, styling, and content presentation.

Changes

File Change Summary
docs/docusaurus.config.ts Updated navigation item configuration and copyright statement
docs/src/components/HomepageFeatures/* Removed feature-related components and styles
docs/src/components/animations/* Deleted animation-related JavaScript files
docs/src/components/layout/* Removed multiple panel components (Second, Third, Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, Seventh, Eighth)
docs/src/css/custom.css Refined styles, added new classes, removed media queries
docs/src/css/index.css Added root variables, updated styles for navbar and components
docs/src/pages/index.tsx Simplified homepage, removed multiple panel components
docs/src/utils/* Deleted utility components like TextColumn, TwoColumns, feature cards

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Update navbar styling and links
Create minimal design for docs-api homepage
Ensure consistent navbar across documentation sites Requires verification across all sites

Suggested Labels

ignore-sensitive-files-pr

Suggested Reviewers

  • palisadoes

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

Our Pull Request Approval Process

Thanks for contributing!

Testing Your Code

Remember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:

  1. We don't merge PRs with poor code quality.
    1. Follow coding best practices such that CodeRabbit.ai approves your PR.
  2. We don't merge PRs with failed tests.
    1. When tests fail, click on the Details link to learn more.
    2. Write sufficient tests for your changes (CodeCov Patch Test). Your testing level must be better than the target threshold of the repository
    3. Tests may fail if you edit sensitive files. Ask to add the ignore-sensitive-files-pr label if the edits are necessary.
  3. We cannot merge PRs with conflicting files. These must be fixed.

Our policies make our code better.

Reviewers

Do not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
When your PR has been assigned reviewers contact them to get your code reviewed and approved via:

  1. comments in this PR or
  2. our slack channel

Reviewing Your Code

Your reviewer(s) will have the following roles:

  1. arbitrators of future discussions with other contributors about the validity of your changes
  2. point of contact for evaluating the validity of your work
  3. person who verifies matching issues by others that should be closed.
  4. person who gives general guidance in fixing your tests

CONTRIBUTING.md

Read our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:

  1. PRs with issues not assigned to you will be closed by the reviewer
  2. Fix the first comment in the PR so that each issue listed automatically closes

Other

  1. 🎯 Please be considerate of our volunteers' time. Contacting the person who assigned the reviewers is not advised unless they ask for your input. Do not @ the person who did the assignment otherwise.
  2. Read the CONTRIBUTING.md file make

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 27, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 39.85%. Comparing base (33b838a) to head (2fbab76).
Report is 1 commits behind head on develop-postgres.

Additional details and impacted files
@@                Coverage Diff                @@
##           develop-postgres    #3091   +/-   ##
=================================================
  Coverage             39.85%   39.85%           
=================================================
  Files                   453      453           
  Lines                 33203    33203           
  Branches                385      385           
=================================================
  Hits                  13234    13234           
  Misses                19969    19969           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

🔭 Outside diff range comments (4)
docs/src/css/index.css (1)

Line range hint 98-134: Add focus states for better accessibility.

The ActionButton styles lack focus states, which is important for keyboard navigation and accessibility.

Add focus states to the buttons:

.ActionButton {
  padding: 0.75rem 1.25rem;
  text-align: center;
  font-size: 1.2rem;
  font-weight: var(--ifm-button-font-weight);
  text-decoration: none !important;
  border-bottom: none;
  transition: all 0.2s ease-out;
  border-radius: 0.375rem;
  margin-right: 10px;
+ outline: none;
}

+.ActionButton:focus-visible {
+  outline: 2px solid var(--ifm-color-primary);
+  outline-offset: 2px;
+}
docs/src/css/custom.css (3)

Line range hint 658-763: Optimize and consolidate media queries.

The current media query structure has several issues:

  1. Overlapping breakpoints (996px-1000px)
  2. Duplicate styles across breakpoints
  3. Complex nested queries that could be simplified

Consider consolidating the breakpoints:

- /* Small Screen */
- @media (max-width: 768px) { ... }
- 
- /* Medium Screens */
- @media (max-width: 996px) { ... }
- 
- /* Small to Medium Screens */
- @media (max-width: 1000px) { ... }
- 
- /* Large to Medium Screens */
- @media (max-width: 1049px) and (min-width: 1001px) { ... }
- 
- /* Medium to Large Screens */
- @media (max-width: 1149px) and (min-width: 1050px) { ... }

+ /* Mobile */
+ @media (max-width: 768px) { ... }
+ 
+ /* Tablet */
+ @media (min-width: 769px) and (max-width: 1024px) { ... }
+ 
+ /* Desktop */
+ @media (min-width: 1025px) { ... }

Line range hint 599-613: Optimize button styles for better performance and maintainability.

  1. The 0.8s transition duration might feel sluggish
  2. Hardcoded color values reduce maintainability

Consider these improvements:

.markdown > button {
- background: linear-gradient(90deg, #ff3600 0%, #ff8100 100%);
+ background: linear-gradient(90deg, var(--button-gradient-start) 0%, var(--button-gradient-end) 100%);
  border: none;
  border-radius: 5px;
  padding: 16.8px 32px;
  color: #fff;
  font-weight: bold;
  cursor: pointer;
- transition: 0.8s;
+ transition: 0.3s ease-out;
  font-size: 16px;
}

.markdown > button:hover {
- background: linear-gradient(90deg, #ff3600 30%, #ff8100 78%);
+ background: linear-gradient(90deg, var(--button-gradient-start) 30%, var(--button-gradient-end) 78%);
}

Link color fails WCAG 2.1 Level AA contrast requirements

The link color #1e56e3 has insufficient contrast (2.93:1) against the background #111927, falling below both the normal text (4.5:1) and large text (3:1) requirements. Consider using a lighter shade of blue to improve accessibility.

🔗 Analysis chain

Line range hint 73-102: Verify color contrast ratios for dark theme.

Please ensure all color combinations meet WCAG 2.1 Level AA standards for contrast ratios (minimum 4.5:1 for normal text and 3:1 for large text).

Run this script to analyze color contrast ratios:

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Install and use color-contrast-checker
npm install -g color-contrast-checker
python3 - << 'EOF'
import json
import subprocess

# Extract colors from CSS
colors = {
    'background': '#111927',
    'text': '#c6d6ff',
    'link': '#1e56e3',
    'menu': '#9da4ae'
}

def check_contrast(fg, bg):
    cmd = f'color-contrast-checker "{fg}" "{bg}"'
    result = subprocess.run(cmd, shell=True, capture_output=True, text=True)
    return result.stdout

for fg_name, fg_color in colors.items():
    if fg_name != 'background':
        result = check_contrast(fg_color, colors['background'])
        print(f"Contrast check for {fg_name}: {result}")
EOF

Length of output: 1811


Script:

#!/bin/bash
python3 - << 'EOF'
def hex_to_rgb(hex_color):
    hex_color = hex_color.lstrip('#')
    return tuple(int(hex_color[i:i+2], 16) / 255.0 for i in (0, 2, 4))

def get_luminance(r, g, b):
    r = r / 12.92 if r <= 0.03928 else ((r + 0.055) / 1.055) ** 2.4
    g = g / 12.92 if g <= 0.03928 else ((g + 0.055) / 1.055) ** 2.4
    b = b / 12.92 if b <= 0.03928 else ((b + 0.055) / 1.055) ** 2.4
    return 0.2126 * r + 0.7152 * g + 0.0722 * b

def contrast_ratio(color1, color2):
    l1 = get_luminance(*hex_to_rgb(color1))
    l2 = get_luminance(*hex_to_rgb(color2))
    lighter = max(l1, l2)
    darker = min(l1, l2)
    return (lighter + 0.05) / (darker + 0.05)

bg = '#111927'
colors = {
    'text': '#c6d6ff',
    'link': '#1e56e3',
    'menu': '#9da4ae'
}

print("WCAG 2.1 Contrast Ratio Requirements:")
print("- Normal text (Level AA): 4.5:1")
print("- Large text (Level AA): 3:1\n")

for name, color in colors.items():
    ratio = contrast_ratio(color, bg)
    print(f"{name.title()} ({color}) on Background ({bg}):")
    print(f"Contrast ratio: {ratio:.2f}:1")
    print(f"Meets AA for normal text: {'Yes' if ratio >= 4.5 else 'No'}")
    print(f"Meets AA for large text: {'Yes' if ratio >= 3 else 'No'}\n")
EOF

Length of output: 479

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 33b838a and f335251.

📒 Files selected for processing (26)
  • docs/docusaurus.config.ts (2 hunks)
  • docs/src/components/HomepageFeatures/index.tsx (0 hunks)
  • docs/src/components/HomepageFeatures/styles.module.css (0 hunks)
  • docs/src/components/animations/_dissectionAnimation.js (0 hunks)
  • docs/src/components/animations/_headerAnimation.js (0 hunks)
  • docs/src/components/layout/EightPanel.tsx (0 hunks)
  • docs/src/components/layout/FifthPanel.tsx (0 hunks)
  • docs/src/components/layout/FourthPanel.tsx (0 hunks)
  • docs/src/components/layout/HeaderHero.tsx (1 hunks)
  • docs/src/components/layout/SecondPanel.tsx (0 hunks)
  • docs/src/components/layout/SeventhPanel.tsx (0 hunks)
  • docs/src/components/layout/SixthPanel.tsx (0 hunks)
  • docs/src/components/layout/ThirdPanel.tsx (0 hunks)
  • docs/src/css/custom.css (10 hunks)
  • docs/src/css/index.css (7 hunks)
  • docs/src/hooks/useHomePageAnimations.ts (0 hunks)
  • docs/src/pages/index.tsx (1 hunks)
  • docs/src/pages/markdown-page.md (0 hunks)
  • docs/src/utils/AppFeaturesCard.tsx (0 hunks)
  • docs/src/utils/HomeCallToAction.tsx (1 hunks)
  • docs/src/utils/ManagementFeaturesCard.tsx (0 hunks)
  • docs/src/utils/OrganizationFeatureCard.tsx (0 hunks)
  • docs/src/utils/ParticipationFeatureCard.tsx (0 hunks)
  • docs/src/utils/TextColumn.tsx (0 hunks)
  • docs/src/utils/TwoColumns.tsx (0 hunks)
  • docs/src/utils/textcontent.js (0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (20)
  • docs/src/pages/markdown-page.md
  • docs/src/components/layout/SecondPanel.tsx
  • docs/src/utils/ManagementFeaturesCard.tsx
  • docs/src/utils/AppFeaturesCard.tsx
  • docs/src/components/layout/SeventhPanel.tsx
  • docs/src/utils/TextColumn.tsx
  • docs/src/utils/OrganizationFeatureCard.tsx
  • docs/src/components/HomepageFeatures/styles.module.css
  • docs/src/utils/textcontent.js
  • docs/src/utils/ParticipationFeatureCard.tsx
  • docs/src/components/layout/FifthPanel.tsx
  • docs/src/utils/TwoColumns.tsx
  • docs/src/components/layout/EightPanel.tsx
  • docs/src/components/layout/FourthPanel.tsx
  • docs/src/components/HomepageFeatures/index.tsx
  • docs/src/components/layout/SixthPanel.tsx
  • docs/src/components/layout/ThirdPanel.tsx
  • docs/src/components/animations/_headerAnimation.js
  • docs/src/hooks/useHomePageAnimations.ts
  • docs/src/components/animations/_dissectionAnimation.js
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
  • GitHub Check: Run tests for talawa api
  • GitHub Check: Analyse Code With CodeQL (typescript)
🔇 Additional comments (6)
docs/src/components/layout/HeaderHero.tsx (1)

9-16: LGTM! Clean and semantic markup structure.

The simplified layout with proper heading hierarchy (h1 -> h2) and focused content aligns well with the minimalistic design goals.

docs/src/pages/index.tsx (1)

Line range hint 7-21: LGTM! Successfully simplified the homepage structure.

The removal of unnecessary panels and animations while maintaining essential metadata aligns perfectly with the minimalistic design goals.

docs/src/utils/HomeCallToAction.tsx (1)

19-19: LGTM! Improved link specificity.

Directing users to the specific talawa-api repository instead of the organization page provides better navigation and user experience.

docs/docusaurus.config.ts (2)

87-88: LGTM! Improved internal routing configuration.

Using to and activeBasePath instead of href for internal navigation follows Docusaurus best practices and ensures proper active state handling.


165-165: LGTM! Updated branding in copyright notice.

Correctly updated the organization name to "The Palisadoes Foundation, LLC" in the copyright notice.

docs/src/css/index.css (1)

Line range hint 8-25: Well-organized CSS variables!

The root variables are semantically named and logically grouped, making the codebase more maintainable.

docs/src/css/index.css Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/src/css/custom.css Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link

Our Pull Request Approval Process

Thanks for contributing!

Testing Your Code

Remember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:

  1. We don't merge PRs with poor code quality.
    1. Follow coding best practices such that CodeRabbit.ai approves your PR.
  2. We don't merge PRs with failed tests.
    1. When tests fail, click on the Details link to learn more.
    2. Write sufficient tests for your changes (CodeCov Patch Test). Your testing level must be better than the target threshold of the repository
    3. Tests may fail if you edit sensitive files. Ask to add the ignore-sensitive-files-pr label if the edits are necessary.
  3. We cannot merge PRs with conflicting files. These must be fixed.

Our policies make our code better.

Reviewers

Do not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
When your PR has been assigned reviewers contact them to get your code reviewed and approved via:

  1. comments in this PR or
  2. our slack channel

Reviewing Your Code

Your reviewer(s) will have the following roles:

  1. arbitrators of future discussions with other contributors about the validity of your changes
  2. point of contact for evaluating the validity of your work
  3. person who verifies matching issues by others that should be closed.
  4. person who gives general guidance in fixing your tests

CONTRIBUTING.md

Read our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:

  1. PRs with issues not assigned to you will be closed by the reviewer
  2. Fix the first comment in the PR so that each issue listed automatically closes

Other

  1. 🎯 Please be considerate of our volunteers' time. Contacting the person who assigned the reviewers is not advised unless they ask for your input. Do not @ the person who did the assignment otherwise.
  2. Read the CONTRIBUTING.md file make

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

🔭 Outside diff range comments (2)
docs/src/css/index.css (1)

Line range hint 97-134: Consider using CSS custom properties for colors.

The ActionButton styles could be more maintainable by using CSS custom properties for colors, especially since you're already using them elsewhere in the codebase.

.ActionButton.primary {
-  background-color: var(--ifm-button-background-color);
+  background-color: var(--brand);
}

.ActionButton.secondary {
-  color: #1c1e21;
-  background-color: #ebedf0;
+  color: var(--text);
+  background-color: var(--tintColor);
}
docs/src/css/custom.css (1)

Line range hint 656-760: Consider consolidating media queries.

The current media queries have overlapping breakpoints and repeated styles. Consider consolidating them for better maintainability.

Example consolidation:

+/* Mobile First Approach */
+@media (min-width: 481px) {
+  /* Tablet styles */
+}
+
+@media (min-width: 769px) {
+  /* Desktop styles */
+}
+
+@media (min-width: 1200px) {
+  /* Large Desktop styles */
+}
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f335251 and 3957ed2.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • docs/src/css/custom.css (10 hunks)
  • docs/src/css/index.css (7 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
  • GitHub Check: Run tests for talawa api
  • GitHub Check: Analyse Code With CodeQL (typescript)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
docs/src/css/index.css (2)

Line range hint 8-25: LGTM! Well-organized root variables.

The new root variables are well-structured with clear naming conventions and consistent color value formatting.


61-64: LGTM! Responsive design with clamp.

Good use of clamp() for responsive margin-top, ensuring consistent spacing across different viewport sizes.

docs/src/css/custom.css (1)

645-648: LGTM! Good height constraints.

The combination of min-height, max-height, and height ensures consistent layout while allowing for flexibility.

docs/src/css/index.css Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/src/css/custom.css Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link

Our Pull Request Approval Process

Thanks for contributing!

Testing Your Code

Remember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:

  1. We don't merge PRs with poor code quality.
    1. Follow coding best practices such that CodeRabbit.ai approves your PR.
  2. We don't merge PRs with failed tests.
    1. When tests fail, click on the Details link to learn more.
    2. Write sufficient tests for your changes (CodeCov Patch Test). Your testing level must be better than the target threshold of the repository
    3. Tests may fail if you edit sensitive files. Ask to add the ignore-sensitive-files-pr label if the edits are necessary.
  3. We cannot merge PRs with conflicting files. These must be fixed.

Our policies make our code better.

Reviewers

Do not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
When your PR has been assigned reviewers contact them to get your code reviewed and approved via:

  1. comments in this PR or
  2. our slack channel

Reviewing Your Code

Your reviewer(s) will have the following roles:

  1. arbitrators of future discussions with other contributors about the validity of your changes
  2. point of contact for evaluating the validity of your work
  3. person who verifies matching issues by others that should be closed.
  4. person who gives general guidance in fixing your tests

CONTRIBUTING.md

Read our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:

  1. PRs with issues not assigned to you will be closed by the reviewer
  2. Fix the first comment in the PR so that each issue listed automatically closes

Other

  1. 🎯 Please be considerate of our volunteers' time. Contacting the person who assigned the reviewers is not advised unless they ask for your input. Do not @ the person who did the assignment otherwise.
  2. Read the CONTRIBUTING.md file make

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🔭 Outside diff range comments (2)
docs/src/css/index.css (2)

Line range hint 74-78: Avoid using !important and check left positioning.

Two potential issues:

  1. Using !important should be avoided as it makes styles harder to maintain
  2. The negative left value (-250px) might cause layout issues
.HeaderHero .title {
  font-size: 3rem;
  line-height: 1;
- margin-bottom: 0 !important;
+ margin-bottom: 0;
- left: -250px;
  opacity: 1.3;
}

Line range hint 101-138: Consider optimizing transitions for better performance.

The button styles look good, but the transition: all might impact performance. Consider transitioning only the specific properties that change on hover.

.ActionButton {
- transition: all 0.2s ease-out;
+ transition: background-color 0.2s ease-out;
}
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3957ed2 and eb81114.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • docs/src/css/index.css (7 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
docs/src/css/index.css (4)

Line range hint 8-41: Well-structured root variables with semantic naming!

Good job implementing CSS custom properties for colors and breakpoints. The variables are well-organized with clear grouping and semantic naming.


Line range hint 146-162: LGTM! Clean implementation of section styles.

Good use of CSS custom properties for colors and consistent spacing.


163-191: Well-structured responsive design implementation!

Good job implementing responsive styles using the breakpoint custom properties. The mobile-first approach with appropriate adjustments for different screen sizes is well done.


193-197: LGTM! Appropriate desktop-specific adjustments.

The section spacing adjustments for desktop views are well-considered.

docs/src/css/index.css Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link

Our Pull Request Approval Process

Thanks for contributing!

Testing Your Code

Remember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:

  1. We don't merge PRs with poor code quality.
    1. Follow coding best practices such that CodeRabbit.ai approves your PR.
  2. We don't merge PRs with failed tests.
    1. When tests fail, click on the Details link to learn more.
    2. Write sufficient tests for your changes (CodeCov Patch Test). Your testing level must be better than the target threshold of the repository
    3. Tests may fail if you edit sensitive files. Ask to add the ignore-sensitive-files-pr label if the edits are necessary.
  3. We cannot merge PRs with conflicting files. These must be fixed.

Our policies make our code better.

Reviewers

Do not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
When your PR has been assigned reviewers contact them to get your code reviewed and approved via:

  1. comments in this PR or
  2. our slack channel

Reviewing Your Code

Your reviewer(s) will have the following roles:

  1. arbitrators of future discussions with other contributors about the validity of your changes
  2. point of contact for evaluating the validity of your work
  3. person who verifies matching issues by others that should be closed.
  4. person who gives general guidance in fixing your tests

CONTRIBUTING.md

Read our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:

  1. PRs with issues not assigned to you will be closed by the reviewer
  2. Fix the first comment in the PR so that each issue listed automatically closes

Other

  1. 🎯 Please be considerate of our volunteers' time. Contacting the person who assigned the reviewers is not advised unless they ask for your input. Do not @ the person who did the assignment otherwise.
  2. Read the CONTRIBUTING.md file make

@Abhi-MS
Copy link
Author

Abhi-MS commented Jan 28, 2025

@palisadoes Please review

@palisadoes palisadoes merged commit 332a957 into PalisadoesFoundation:develop-postgres Jan 28, 2025
17 of 18 checks passed
palisadoes pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 28, 2025
…g wrong brand color. Apologies for the oversight! (#3092)

* Modify the style of navbar to match Talawa docs

* Change navbar links to ensure consistency across websites

* Modify navbar and sidebar styles to match Talawa docs

* Remove unnecessary css icon styling to remove external link icon in navbar

* Fix styling bugs when deployed

* Delete unnecessary sections from homepage

* Fix footer text from My Project, Inc. to The Palisadoes Foundation, LLC.

* Ensure responsiveness

* Update homepage with minimal design

* Delete unnecessary styles from custom.css

* Delete unnecessary styles from index.css and update style for markdown pages in customs.css

* Organize index.css for better readability

* Organize custom.css for better readability

* Modify navabar to have active nav link style

* Resolve coderabbitai suggestions

* Resolve coderabbitai suggestions, breakpoints

* Resolve coderabbitai suggestions, breakpoints 2

* Fix bug from coderabbit suggestion

* Improve accessibility regarding external link icon

* Make header hero height style more fluid

* Change hardcoded CSS for better maintainability

---------

Co-authored-by: Abhi-MS <[email protected]>
@Abhi-MS Abhi-MS mentioned this pull request Jan 28, 2025
6 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants