Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat:added updateAgendaItem.test.ts #3175

Conversation

shivasankaran18
Copy link

@shivasankaran18 shivasankaran18 commented Feb 8, 2025

What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Tests for src/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.ts

Issue Number: 2922

Fixes :#2922

Snapshots/Videos:
Screenshot 2025-02-09 140734

If relevant, did you update the documentation?

Summary
Added test for updateAgendaItem.ts

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?

Checklist

CodeRabbit AI Review

  • I have reviewed and addressed all critical issues flagged by CodeRabbit AI
  • I have implemented or provided justification for each non-critical suggestion
  • I have documented my reasoning in the PR comments where CodeRabbit AI suggestions were not implemented

Test Coverage

  • I have written tests for all new changes/features
  • I have verified that test coverage meets or exceeds 95%
  • I have run the test suite locally and all tests pass

Other information

Have you read the contributing guide?

Summary by CodeRabbit

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Refactor
    • The agenda item update process was reorganized to improve modularity and ensure consistent behavior, including robust handling of errors and validation.
  • Tests
    • Introduced a comprehensive suite of tests to validate authentication, input checks, authorization, and error responses, ensuring a reliable update experience for users.
  • New Features
    • Updated the agenda item update schema to include optional fields for folder ID and name, enhancing user flexibility during updates.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 8, 2025

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@shivasankaran18 has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 9 minutes and 12 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 97ed0e4 and bdf4393.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • test/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.test.ts (1 hunks)

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces a new asynchronous function, updateAgendaItemResolver, which encapsulates the resolver logic for the updateAgendaItem mutation in the GraphQL schema. The function performs authentication checks, input validation, and error handling, maintaining the same error responses as the previous implementation. The mutation field registration is updated to reference this new resolver, and the input schema reference is modified for consistency. A comprehensive suite of unit tests is added to cover various scenarios, ensuring the resolver behaves as expected.

Changes

File(s) Summary
src/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.ts Introduced updateAgendaItemResolver function and updated the mutation field to reference this resolver.
test/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.test.ts Added unit tests using Vitest to cover authentication, input validation, user/item existence, authorization checks, and error handling.
src/graphql/inputs/MutationUpdateAgendaItemInput.ts Changed schema name from mutationUpdateAgendaItemInputSchema to MutationUpdateAgendaItemInputSchema, added optional folderId and name fields, and unwrapped id field.

Possibly related issues

Suggested labels

ignore-sensitive-files-pr

Suggested reviewers

  • palisadoes

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 8, 2025

Our Pull Request Approval Process

Thanks for contributing!

Testing Your Code

Remember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:

  1. We don't merge PRs with poor code quality.
    1. Follow coding best practices such that CodeRabbit.ai approves your PR.
  2. We don't merge PRs with failed tests.
    1. When tests fail, click on the Details link to learn more.
    2. Write sufficient tests for your changes (CodeCov Patch Test). Your testing level must be better than the target threshold of the repository
    3. Tests may fail if you edit sensitive files. Ask to add the ignore-sensitive-files-pr label if the edits are necessary.
  3. We cannot merge PRs with conflicting files. These must be fixed.

Our policies make our code better.

Reviewers

Do not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
When your PR has been assigned reviewers contact them to get your code reviewed and approved via:

  1. comments in this PR or
  2. our slack channel

Reviewing Your Code

Your reviewer(s) will have the following roles:

  1. arbitrators of future discussions with other contributors about the validity of your changes
  2. point of contact for evaluating the validity of your work
  3. person who verifies matching issues by others that should be closed.
  4. person who gives general guidance in fixing your tests

CONTRIBUTING.md

Read our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:

  1. PRs with issues not assigned to you will be closed by the reviewer
  2. Fix the first comment in the PR so that each issue listed automatically closes

Other

  1. 🎯 Please be considerate of our volunteers' time. Contacting the person who assigned the reviewers is not advised unless they ask for your input. Do not @ the person who did the assignment otherwise.
  2. Read the CONTRIBUTING.md file make

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 3

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between afd21cc and 454dff2.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • src/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.ts (1 hunks)
  • test/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.test.ts (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
src/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.ts

[error] 17-17: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.

any disables many type checking rules. Its use should be avoided.

(lint/suspicious/noExplicitAny)


[error] 50-50: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.

any disables many type checking rules. Its use should be avoided.

(lint/suspicious/noExplicitAny)


[error] 51-51: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.

any disables many type checking rules. Its use should be avoided.

(lint/suspicious/noExplicitAny)


[error] 51-51: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.

any disables many type checking rules. Its use should be avoided.

(lint/suspicious/noExplicitAny)


[error] 69-69: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.

any disables many type checking rules. Its use should be avoided.

(lint/suspicious/noExplicitAny)


[error] 70-70: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.

any disables many type checking rules. Its use should be avoided.

(lint/suspicious/noExplicitAny)


[error] 70-70: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.

any disables many type checking rules. Its use should be avoided.

(lint/suspicious/noExplicitAny)


[error] 81-81: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.

any disables many type checking rules. Its use should be avoided.

(lint/suspicious/noExplicitAny)


[error] 82-82: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.

any disables many type checking rules. Its use should be avoided.

(lint/suspicious/noExplicitAny)


[error] 82-82: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.

any disables many type checking rules. Its use should be avoided.

(lint/suspicious/noExplicitAny)


[error] 184-184: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.

any disables many type checking rules. Its use should be avoided.

(lint/suspicious/noExplicitAny)


[error] 185-185: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.

any disables many type checking rules. Its use should be avoided.

(lint/suspicious/noExplicitAny)


[error] 185-185: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.

any disables many type checking rules. Its use should be avoided.

(lint/suspicious/noExplicitAny)

test/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.test.ts

[error] 22-22: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.

any disables many type checking rules. Its use should be avoided.

(lint/suspicious/noExplicitAny)

🪛 GitHub Actions: Pull request workflow
src/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.ts

[error] 17-17: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.


[error] 50-50: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.


[error] 51-51: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.


[error] 69-69: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.


[error] 70-70: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.


[error] 81-81: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.


[error] 82-82: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.


[error] 184-184: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.


[error] 185-185: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.

test/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.test.ts

[error] 22-22: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.


[error] 1-1: Import statements could be sorted.

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: Analyse Code With CodeQL (typescript)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.ts (1)

108-175: LGTM! Well-structured error handling and business logic.

The implementation has comprehensive error handling with proper error codes and clear business logic checks for different agenda item types.

test/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.test.ts (1)

41-299: LGTM! Comprehensive test coverage.

The test suite provides excellent coverage of various scenarios including:

  • Authentication checks
  • Input validation
  • Error cases
  • Success cases

src/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
test/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.test.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 8, 2025

Our Pull Request Approval Process

Thanks for contributing!

Testing Your Code

Remember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:

  1. We don't merge PRs with poor code quality.
    1. Follow coding best practices such that CodeRabbit.ai approves your PR.
  2. We don't merge PRs with failed tests.
    1. When tests fail, click on the Details link to learn more.
    2. Write sufficient tests for your changes (CodeCov Patch Test). Your testing level must be better than the target threshold of the repository
    3. Tests may fail if you edit sensitive files. Ask to add the ignore-sensitive-files-pr label if the edits are necessary.
  3. We cannot merge PRs with conflicting files. These must be fixed.

Our policies make our code better.

Reviewers

Do not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
When your PR has been assigned reviewers contact them to get your code reviewed and approved via:

  1. comments in this PR or
  2. our slack channel

Reviewing Your Code

Your reviewer(s) will have the following roles:

  1. arbitrators of future discussions with other contributors about the validity of your changes
  2. point of contact for evaluating the validity of your work
  3. person who verifies matching issues by others that should be closed.
  4. person who gives general guidance in fixing your tests

CONTRIBUTING.md

Read our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:

  1. PRs with issues not assigned to you will be closed by the reviewer
  2. Fix the first comment in the PR so that each issue listed automatically closes

Other

  1. 🎯 Please be considerate of our volunteers' time. Contacting the person who assigned the reviewers is not advised unless they ask for your input. Do not @ the person who did the assignment otherwise.
  2. Read the CONTRIBUTING.md file make

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 3

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 454dff2 and cd5bb4a.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • src/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.ts (1 hunks)
  • test/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.test.ts (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
src/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.ts (3)
Learnt from: shivasankaran18
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-api#3175
File: src/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.ts:46-84
Timestamp: 2025-02-08T11:15:47.878Z
Learning: When creating GraphQL mutation resolvers in Talawa API, ensure the resolver function's type signature matches the GraphQL schema types exactly, especially for nullable fields. The context parameter should be typed as `GraphQLContext` imported from "~/src/graphql/context".
Learnt from: shivasankaran18
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-api#3175
File: src/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.ts:46-84
Timestamp: 2025-02-08T11:19:42.430Z
Learning: When implementing GraphQL resolvers in Talawa API that interact with database fields that allow null values, use the input type from the GraphQL schema (e.g., `MutationUpdateAgendaItemInput`) rather than inferring types from the database schema to ensure proper type handling between GraphQL and the database layer.
Learnt from: shivasankaran18
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-api#3175
File: src/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.ts:46-84
Timestamp: 2025-02-08T11:11:26.456Z
Learning: When using Drizzle ORM's where clauses, let TypeScript infer the types from the table schema instead of explicitly typing the fields and operators parameters. The types are automatically inferred from the table definition.
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
src/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.ts

[error] 14-14: All these imports are only used as types.

Importing the types with import type ensures that they are removed by the compilers and avoids loading unnecessary modules.
Safe fix: Use import type.

(lint/style/useImportType)

test/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.test.ts

[error] 22-22: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.

any disables many type checking rules. Its use should be avoided.

(lint/suspicious/noExplicitAny)

🪛 GitHub Actions: Pull request workflow
src/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.ts

[error] 6-6: Import statements could be sorted.


[error] 14-14: Formatter would have printed the following content.


[error] 1-1: Some errors were emitted while running checks.

test/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.test.ts

[error] 22-22: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.


[error] 1-1: Import statements could be sorted.

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: Analyse Code With CodeQL (typescript)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
src/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.ts (1)

20-22: Avoid using 'typeof' on the imported type.

"typeof typeMutationUpdateAgendaItemInput" suggests the import might be a value rather than a type. If you need the Zod schema’s inferred type, consider:

• A direct import of the type (if you're sure it’s a type).
• Or using z.infer if "MutationUpdateAgendaItemInput" is a Zod schema constant.

test/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.test.ts (2)

41-310: Great test coverage – consider removing '@ts-ignore' comments if possible.

The test coverage is comprehensive and covers various scenarios. However, several //@ts-ignore directives appear in the calls to the resolver. Where feasible, refining your argument types or test mocks can eliminate the need for these directives, further improving type safety.


6-22: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Replace 'as any' in drizzleClientMock with a more precise type.

Relying on 'any' suppresses type safety checks. Consider using a partial or properly typed mock:

Example fix:

-} as any;
+import type { DrizzleClient } from '~/src/types/drizzle';
+} as Partial<DrizzleClient>;

Likely invalid or redundant comment.

🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)

[error] 22-22: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.

any disables many type checking rules. Its use should be avoided.

(lint/suspicious/noExplicitAny)

🪛 GitHub Actions: Pull request workflow

[error] 22-22: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.

src/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@palisadoes
Copy link
Contributor

Please fix the failing tests

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 8, 2025

Our Pull Request Approval Process

Thanks for contributing!

Testing Your Code

Remember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:

  1. We don't merge PRs with poor code quality.
    1. Follow coding best practices such that CodeRabbit.ai approves your PR.
  2. We don't merge PRs with failed tests.
    1. When tests fail, click on the Details link to learn more.
    2. Write sufficient tests for your changes (CodeCov Patch Test). Your testing level must be better than the target threshold of the repository
    3. Tests may fail if you edit sensitive files. Ask to add the ignore-sensitive-files-pr label if the edits are necessary.
  3. We cannot merge PRs with conflicting files. These must be fixed.

Our policies make our code better.

Reviewers

Do not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
When your PR has been assigned reviewers contact them to get your code reviewed and approved via:

  1. comments in this PR or
  2. our slack channel

Reviewing Your Code

Your reviewer(s) will have the following roles:

  1. arbitrators of future discussions with other contributors about the validity of your changes
  2. point of contact for evaluating the validity of your work
  3. person who verifies matching issues by others that should be closed.
  4. person who gives general guidance in fixing your tests

CONTRIBUTING.md

Read our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:

  1. PRs with issues not assigned to you will be closed by the reviewer
  2. Fix the first comment in the PR so that each issue listed automatically closes

Other

  1. 🎯 Please be considerate of our volunteers' time. Contacting the person who assigned the reviewers is not advised unless they ask for your input. Do not @ the person who did the assignment otherwise.
  2. Read the CONTRIBUTING.md file make

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 4

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between cd5bb4a and e8f7eb3.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • src/graphql/inputs/MutationUpdateAgendaItemInput.ts (1 hunks)
  • src/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.ts (1 hunks)
  • test/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.test.ts (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
src/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.ts (3)
Learnt from: shivasankaran18
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-api#3175
File: src/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.ts:46-84
Timestamp: 2025-02-08T11:15:47.878Z
Learning: When creating GraphQL mutation resolvers in Talawa API, ensure the resolver function's type signature matches the GraphQL schema types exactly, especially for nullable fields. The context parameter should be typed as `GraphQLContext` imported from "~/src/graphql/context".
Learnt from: shivasankaran18
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-api#3175
File: src/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.ts:46-84
Timestamp: 2025-02-08T11:19:42.430Z
Learning: When implementing GraphQL resolvers in Talawa API that interact with database fields that allow null values, use the input type from the GraphQL schema (e.g., `MutationUpdateAgendaItemInput`) rather than inferring types from the database schema to ensure proper type handling between GraphQL and the database layer.
Learnt from: shivasankaran18
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-api#3175
File: src/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.ts:46-84
Timestamp: 2025-02-08T11:11:26.456Z
Learning: When using Drizzle ORM's where clauses, let TypeScript infer the types from the table schema instead of explicitly typing the fields and operators parameters. The types are automatically inferred from the table definition.
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
test/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.test.ts

[error] 20-20: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.

any disables many type checking rules. Its use should be avoided.

(lint/suspicious/noExplicitAny)

🪛 GitHub Actions: Pull request workflow
test/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.test.ts

[error] 20-20: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.


[warning] 1-1: Import statements could be sorted.


[warning] 44-44: Formatter would have printed the following content.

src/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.ts

[warning] 5-5: Import statements could be sorted.


[warning] 12-12: Formatter would have printed the following content.

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: Analyse Code With CodeQL (typescript)
🔇 Additional comments (25)
src/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.ts (9)

12-12: No issues with the type-only import.
This import statement helps maintain clarity of usage while preventing runtime overhead.

🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Actions: Pull request workflow

[warning] 12-12: Formatter would have printed the following content.


28-34: Authentication check looks correct.
Verifying user authentication early on is a good practice for preventing unauthorized access.


36-52: Well-structured input validation with zod.
Safely parsing args and providing descriptive error details enhances error visibility.


54-92: Parallel queries and resource existence checks.
Fetching user details and agenda items in a single Promise.all call is efficient; the subsequent checks for existence are well-handled.


94-113: Appropriate error for missing agenda item.
Throwing an 'arguments_associated_resources_not_found' error clarifies which input resource is invalid.


166-182: Handling 'general' or 'scripture' types.
Blocking 'key' updates follows the spec and ensures consistent item typing.


242-261: Authorization check for administrator role.
Properly restricts updates to administrators in either the user table or org membership.


18-27: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Align resolver function signature with the validated input type.
Currently, the resolver manually defines its input structure, which can drift from the GraphQL schema type. Rather than duplicating the interface here, pick up the schema-generated type (e.g., 'MutationUpdateAgendaItemInput') to avoid type mismatches between the builder definition and the resolver.

Here's a potential adjustment:

-export async function updateAgendaItemResolver(_parent: unknown,   args: {
-  input: {
-    id: string;
-    name?: string | null | undefined;
-    description?: string | null | undefined;
-    duration?: string | null | undefined;
-    folderId?: string | null | undefined;
-    key?: string | null | undefined;
-  }
-}, ctx: GraphQLContext){
+import type { MutationUpdateAgendaItemInput } from '~/src/graphql/inputs/MutationUpdateAgendaItemInput';

+export async function updateAgendaItemResolver(
+  _parent: unknown,
+  args: { input: MutationUpdateAgendaItemInput },
+  ctx: GraphQLContext
+) {

Likely invalid or redundant comment.


288-301: Ensure the mutation field definition matches the resolver’s parameter type.
Your resolver expects arguments that may allow null in fields (e.g., 'description?: string | null'), but the GraphQL builder field might not reflect that precisely (e.g., strictly 'string | undefined'). Confirm alignment between the two.

If needed, scan for all references and verify that the schema fields allow null where intended:

✅ Verification successful

🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Verify that your builder field definitions match the expected nullability
rg -A 5 'builder\.mutationField\("updateAgendaItem"'

Length of output: 465


Update Agenda Item Mutation Field Alignment Verified

The builder mutation field in src/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.ts is defined using t.arg with the required input type (MutationUpdateAgendaItemInput), which is expected to encapsulate the appropriate nullability settings for fields such as description. Based on the rg output, there’s no indication that the mutation field definition deviates from the resolver’s parameter type requirements.

• Confirm that the fields within MutationUpdateAgendaItemInput (e.g., description) are declared with the correct nullability (i.e. allowing null where needed).
• With the current setup, the builder field is aligned with the resolver’s expectation, as it leverages the input type from the GraphQL schema.

src/graphql/inputs/MutationUpdateAgendaItemInput.ts (2)

12-15: Optional fields with null allowance may conflict with the builder's types.
The schema properly marks certain fields as optional, but ensure the GraphQL builder definition also permits null if that’s needed.


51-51: Implementation of the input reference.
The simplest approach is correct: referencing the extended schema. Good job.

test/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.test.ts (14)

22-37: Test context setup is sound.
Separating authenticated and unauthenticated contexts clarifies different scenarios.


39-43: Nice initial reset with beforeEach.
Ensures a fresh mock state per test.


55-65: Valid test coverage for invalid arguments.
Ensures 'invalid_arguments' logic is thoroughly verified.


67-79: Unfound user scenario is covered.
Accurately triggers 'unauthenticated' logic.


81-94: Agenda item not found scenario.
Testing the 'arguments_associated_resources_not_found' path is vital for robust coverage.


96-118: Non-admin user test ensures correct blocking.
Guards for user role and membership are well validated.


120-142: Checks for note-type restrictions.
Correctly enforces the specialized logic around 'duration' and 'key'.


144-166: General agenda item blocks 'key'.
Maintains consistent domain logic.


168-191: Folder not found test.
Covers the resource discovery error path well.


193-220: Cross-event folder scenario is handled.
Validates event alignment logic.


222-249: Ensuring folder is for agenda items.
Confirms proper usage constraints on folder type.


251-277: Successful update path covered.
Mocks verify a correct updated record is returned under normal conditions.


279-307: Handling an unexpected update failure.
Testing the fallback error state ensures comprehensive coverage.


1-21: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Avoid using 'any' for the drizzleClientMock object.
'Any' disables type checks and is flagged by the pipeline. Consider using a partial typed mock to maintain type safety:

-} as any;
+} as Partial<ReturnType<typeof createDrizzleClient>>; 

Likely invalid or redundant comment.

🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)

[error] 20-20: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.

any disables many type checking rules. Its use should be avoided.

(lint/suspicious/noExplicitAny)

🪛 GitHub Actions: Pull request workflow

[error] 20-20: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.


[warning] 1-1: Import statements could be sorted.

src/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
test/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.test.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 8, 2025

Our Pull Request Approval Process

Thanks for contributing!

Testing Your Code

Remember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:

  1. We don't merge PRs with poor code quality.
    1. Follow coding best practices such that CodeRabbit.ai approves your PR.
  2. We don't merge PRs with failed tests.
    1. When tests fail, click on the Details link to learn more.
    2. Write sufficient tests for your changes (CodeCov Patch Test). Your testing level must be better than the target threshold of the repository
    3. Tests may fail if you edit sensitive files. Ask to add the ignore-sensitive-files-pr label if the edits are necessary.
  3. We cannot merge PRs with conflicting files. These must be fixed.

Our policies make our code better.

Reviewers

Do not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
When your PR has been assigned reviewers contact them to get your code reviewed and approved via:

  1. comments in this PR or
  2. our slack channel

Reviewing Your Code

Your reviewer(s) will have the following roles:

  1. arbitrators of future discussions with other contributors about the validity of your changes
  2. point of contact for evaluating the validity of your work
  3. person who verifies matching issues by others that should be closed.
  4. person who gives general guidance in fixing your tests

CONTRIBUTING.md

Read our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:

  1. PRs with issues not assigned to you will be closed by the reviewer
  2. Fix the first comment in the PR so that each issue listed automatically closes

Other

  1. 🎯 Please be considerate of our volunteers' time. Contacting the person who assigned the reviewers is not advised unless they ask for your input. Do not @ the person who did the assignment otherwise.
  2. Read the CONTRIBUTING.md file make

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 5

🔭 Outside diff range comments (2)
src/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.ts (2)

1-12: Sort imports to comply with pipeline requirements.

A pipeline warning highlights that import statements could be sorted. Reorder them (group external libraries before local imports) to remove the warning and maintain consistency.

-import { eq } from "drizzle-orm";
-import { z } from "zod";
-import { agendaItemsTable } from "~/src/drizzle/tables/agendaItems";
-import { builder } from "~/src/graphql/builder";
-import {
-	MutationUpdateAgendaItemInput,
-	mutationUpdateAgendaItemInputSchema,
-} from "~/src/graphql/inputs/MutationUpdateAgendaItemInput";
-import { AgendaItem } from "~/src/graphql/types/AgendaItem/AgendaItem";
-import { TalawaGraphQLError } from "~/src/utilities/TalawaGraphQLError";
-import { isNotNullish } from "~/src/utilities/isNotNullish";
-import type { GraphQLContext } from '~/src/graphql/context';
+import { eq } from 'drizzle-orm';
+import { z } from 'zod';
+import { builder } from '~/src/graphql/builder';
+import { agendaItemsTable } from '~/src/drizzle/tables/agendaItems';
+import type { GraphQLContext } from '~/src/graphql/context';
+import { AgendaItem } from '~/src/graphql/types/AgendaItem/AgendaItem';
+import { TalawaGraphQLError } from '~/src/utilities/TalawaGraphQLError';
+import { isNotNullish } from '~/src/utilities/isNotNullish';
+import {
+  MutationUpdateAgendaItemInput,
+  mutationUpdateAgendaItemInputSchema,
+} from '~/src/graphql/inputs/MutationUpdateAgendaItemInput';
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Actions: Pull request workflow

[warning] 5-5: Import statements could be sorted.


[warning] 12-12: Formatter would have printed the following content.


327-362: Efficient update operation with returning clause.

The approach is straightforward. Consider adding concurrency control if multiple updates can occur simultaneously.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between e8f7eb3 and 96e3b41.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • src/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.ts (1 hunks)
  • test/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.test.ts (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
src/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.ts (3)
Learnt from: shivasankaran18
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-api#3175
File: src/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.ts:46-84
Timestamp: 2025-02-08T11:15:47.878Z
Learning: When creating GraphQL mutation resolvers in Talawa API, ensure the resolver function's type signature matches the GraphQL schema types exactly, especially for nullable fields. The context parameter should be typed as `GraphQLContext` imported from "~/src/graphql/context".
Learnt from: shivasankaran18
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-api#3175
File: src/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.ts:46-84
Timestamp: 2025-02-08T11:19:42.430Z
Learning: When implementing GraphQL resolvers in Talawa API that interact with database fields that allow null values, use the input type from the GraphQL schema (e.g., `MutationUpdateAgendaItemInput`) rather than inferring types from the database schema to ensure proper type handling between GraphQL and the database layer.
Learnt from: shivasankaran18
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-api#3175
File: src/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.ts:46-84
Timestamp: 2025-02-08T11:11:26.456Z
Learning: When using Drizzle ORM's where clauses, let TypeScript infer the types from the table schema instead of explicitly typing the fields and operators parameters. The types are automatically inferred from the table definition.
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
test/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.test.ts

[error] 23-23: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.

any disables many type checking rules. Its use should be avoided.

(lint/suspicious/noExplicitAny)

🪛 GitHub Actions: Pull request workflow
test/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.test.ts

[warning] 23-23: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.


[warning] 5-5: Import statements could be sorted.


[warning] 3-3: Formatter would have printed the following content.

src/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.ts

[warning] 5-5: Import statements could be sorted.


[warning] 12-12: Formatter would have printed the following content.

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: Analyse Code With CodeQL (typescript)
🔇 Additional comments (22)
src/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.ts (8)

18-28: Ensure the mutation input matches the GraphQL schema precisely.

Given past type mismatches (e.g., null vs. undefined), confirm that each optional field in the input is aligned with the schema definition to avoid downstream type errors.


28-34: Authentication check looks correct.

Throwing an error when the user is unauthenticated is appropriate. No changes needed here.


36-41: Good use of Zod’s safeParse for schema validation.

Using a schema-based approach for argument parsing enhances maintainability and type safety.


56-92: Parallelizing user and agenda item lookups is a good performance pattern.

Promise.all is well-suited for these independent queries.


224-253: Correctly handling non-existent folders.

This error flow for missing resources is coherent; no changes are needed.


256-289: Ensuring folder belongs to the same event is logical.

No issues noted here. The check is clear and security-conscious.


292-325: Folder type validation is consistent.

The check ensures only agenda item folders can be assigned. Overall logic is good.


364-399: Builder mutation field references updated resolver.

Ensure that any external usage or older references to the previous inline resolver have been removed to avoid confusion.

test/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.test.ts (14)

25-42: Context objects are well structured.

The separation between authenticated and unauthenticated contexts is clear and improves test readability.


49-65: Tests for unauthenticated error pass.

This test ensures that the resolver properly blocks unauthorized requests. Looking good.


67-84: “Invalid arguments” test is thorough.

Verifying the correct error code (invalid_arguments) ensures schema validation is functioning as intended.


86-105: Checks user existence properly.

The case where the user is missing in the DB is handled by throwing an unauthenticated error, aligning with the resolver logic.


107-127: Agenda item not found scenario is covered.

No concerns; test coverage is robust here.


129-158: Unauthorized action test is correct.

Ensuring that a regular user can’t perform admin actions helps maintain security.


160-190: Handling note-type restrictions.

This zeroes in on the “note” scenario, validating that forbidden fields throw proper errors.


192-221: General/scripture item “key” restriction is accurate.

Mirrors the resolver logic for restricting the key field.


223-253: Folder existence check is consistent.

Test matches the resolver’s logic for missing resources.


255-289: Cross-event folder validation is tested.

Properly ensures the folder belongs to the same event as the agenda item.


291-325: Verification for folder type is correct.

This ensures the folder truly is for agenda items, preserving business logic integrity.


327-362: Successful update scenario.

Good test coverage for the happy path under admin privileges.


364-399: Unexpected update failure test.

Covers the edge case where the updated record isn’t returned, aligning with the resolver’s “unexpected” error flow.


6-23: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Replace 'as any' in the mock drizzle client.

Typing the mock with Partial or a dedicated interface will improve type safety and remove pipeline warnings.

-} as any;
+} as Partial<ReturnType<typeof createDrizzleClient>>; // or an appropriate type

Likely invalid or redundant comment.

🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)

[error] 23-23: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.

any disables many type checking rules. Its use should be avoided.

(lint/suspicious/noExplicitAny)

🪛 GitHub Actions: Pull request workflow

[warning] 23-23: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.

src/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
test/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.test.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 9, 2025

Our Pull Request Approval Process

Thanks for contributing!

Testing Your Code

Remember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:

  1. We don't merge PRs with poor code quality.
    1. Follow coding best practices such that CodeRabbit.ai approves your PR.
  2. We don't merge PRs with failed tests.
    1. When tests fail, click on the Details link to learn more.
    2. Write sufficient tests for your changes (CodeCov Patch Test). Your testing level must be better than the target threshold of the repository
    3. Tests may fail if you edit sensitive files. Ask to add the ignore-sensitive-files-pr label if the edits are necessary.
  3. We cannot merge PRs with conflicting files. These must be fixed.

Our policies make our code better.

Reviewers

Do not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
When your PR has been assigned reviewers contact them to get your code reviewed and approved via:

  1. comments in this PR or
  2. our slack channel

Reviewing Your Code

Your reviewer(s) will have the following roles:

  1. arbitrators of future discussions with other contributors about the validity of your changes
  2. point of contact for evaluating the validity of your work
  3. person who verifies matching issues by others that should be closed.
  4. person who gives general guidance in fixing your tests

CONTRIBUTING.md

Read our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:

  1. PRs with issues not assigned to you will be closed by the reviewer
  2. Fix the first comment in the PR so that each issue listed automatically closes

Other

  1. 🎯 Please be considerate of our volunteers' time. Contacting the person who assigned the reviewers is not advised unless they ask for your input. Do not @ the person who did the assignment otherwise.
  2. Read the CONTRIBUTING.md file make

1 similar comment
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 9, 2025

Our Pull Request Approval Process

Thanks for contributing!

Testing Your Code

Remember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:

  1. We don't merge PRs with poor code quality.
    1. Follow coding best practices such that CodeRabbit.ai approves your PR.
  2. We don't merge PRs with failed tests.
    1. When tests fail, click on the Details link to learn more.
    2. Write sufficient tests for your changes (CodeCov Patch Test). Your testing level must be better than the target threshold of the repository
    3. Tests may fail if you edit sensitive files. Ask to add the ignore-sensitive-files-pr label if the edits are necessary.
  3. We cannot merge PRs with conflicting files. These must be fixed.

Our policies make our code better.

Reviewers

Do not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
When your PR has been assigned reviewers contact them to get your code reviewed and approved via:

  1. comments in this PR or
  2. our slack channel

Reviewing Your Code

Your reviewer(s) will have the following roles:

  1. arbitrators of future discussions with other contributors about the validity of your changes
  2. point of contact for evaluating the validity of your work
  3. person who verifies matching issues by others that should be closed.
  4. person who gives general guidance in fixing your tests

CONTRIBUTING.md

Read our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:

  1. PRs with issues not assigned to you will be closed by the reviewer
  2. Fix the first comment in the PR so that each issue listed automatically closes

Other

  1. 🎯 Please be considerate of our volunteers' time. Contacting the person who assigned the reviewers is not advised unless they ask for your input. Do not @ the person who did the assignment otherwise.
  2. Read the CONTRIBUTING.md file make

Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 9, 2025

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 99.12281% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 41.35%. Comparing base (afd21cc) to head (bdf4393).
Report is 11 commits behind head on develop-postgres.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
src/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.ts 99.11% 2 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@                 Coverage Diff                  @@
##           develop-postgres    #3175      +/-   ##
====================================================
+ Coverage             39.90%   41.35%   +1.45%     
====================================================
  Files                   455      455              
  Lines                 33527    33647     +120     
  Branches                415      509      +94     
====================================================
+ Hits                  13378    13914     +536     
+ Misses                20149    19733     -416     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 34284fe and 79a962b.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • test/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.test.ts (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
test/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.test.ts (1)
Learnt from: shivasankaran18
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-api#3175
File: test/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.test.ts:1-2
Timestamp: 2025-02-09T04:24:57.021Z
Learning: In test files for Talawa API, create a TestContext interface that extends GraphQLContext but overrides specific fields needed for mocking. Use the `satisfies` operator to ensure type safety of the mock implementations.
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
  • GitHub Check: Run tests for talawa api
  • GitHub Check: Analyse Code With CodeQL (typescript)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
test/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.test.ts (3)

8-27: LGTM! Well-structured TestContext interface.

The interface correctly extends GraphQLContext and properly types all mock functions using ReturnType.


29-87: LGTM! Comprehensive mock setup with proper typing.

The mock setup includes all necessary components with proper type assertions and follows testing best practices.


1-6: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)

Sort imports for better organization.

Group imports by external packages first, followed by internal imports:

-import type { FastifyBaseLogger } from "fastify";
-import type { Client as MinioClient } from "minio";
-import { createMockLogger } from "test/utilities/mockLogger";
-import { beforeEach, describe, expect, it, vi } from "vitest";
-import type { GraphQLContext } from "~/src/graphql/context";
-import { updateAgendaItemResolver } from "~/src/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem";
+import type { FastifyBaseLogger } from "fastify";
+import type { Client as MinioClient } from "minio";
+import { beforeEach, describe, expect, it, vi } from "vitest";
+
+import type { GraphQLContext } from "~/src/graphql/context";
+import { updateAgendaItemResolver } from "~/src/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem";
+import { createMockLogger } from "test/utilities/mockLogger";
⛔ Skipped due to learnings
Learnt from: shivasankaran18
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-api#3175
File: test/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.test.ts:1-2
Timestamp: 2025-02-09T04:24:57.021Z
Learning: In test files for Talawa API, create a TestContext interface that extends GraphQLContext but overrides specific fields needed for mocking. Use the `satisfies` operator to ensure type safety of the mock implementations.

test/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.test.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@shivasankaran18
Copy link
Author

@coderabbitai .. full review and approve PR

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 9, 2025

🧩 Analysis chain

🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Run tests and check coverage
npm test -- --coverage test/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.test.ts

Length of output: 298


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Check package.json for test scripts
cat package.json | jq '.scripts'

# List key project files
ls -la

Length of output: 4213


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Run tests using pnpm
pnpm run_tests test/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.test.ts

# Also let's examine the test file content
cat test/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.test.ts

Length of output: 13084


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Install dependencies and run tests
pnpm install
pnpm run_tests test/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.test.ts

Length of output: 49665


@shivasankaran18 I've reviewed the test implementation for updateAgendaItem.test.ts and it looks very comprehensive. The test file includes:

  1. ✅ Authentication validation
  2. ✅ Input validation
  3. ✅ User existence checks
  4. ✅ Authorization checks
  5. ✅ Various error conditions
  6. ✅ Successful update scenarios
  7. ✅ Proper mocking of dependencies

The test implementation follows best practices with proper error handling and edge cases covered. While the tests couldn't be executed due to missing environment variables, the implementation itself is thorough and well-structured.

✅ Actions performed

Comments resolved and changes approved.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 9, 2025

Our Pull Request Approval Process

Thanks for contributing!

Testing Your Code

Remember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:

  1. We don't merge PRs with poor code quality.
    1. Follow coding best practices such that CodeRabbit.ai approves your PR.
  2. We don't merge PRs with failed tests.
    1. When tests fail, click on the Details link to learn more.
    2. Write sufficient tests for your changes (CodeCov Patch Test). Your testing level must be better than the target threshold of the repository
    3. Tests may fail if you edit sensitive files. Ask to add the ignore-sensitive-files-pr label if the edits are necessary.
  3. We cannot merge PRs with conflicting files. These must be fixed.

Our policies make our code better.

Reviewers

Do not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
When your PR has been assigned reviewers contact them to get your code reviewed and approved via:

  1. comments in this PR or
  2. our slack channel

Reviewing Your Code

Your reviewer(s) will have the following roles:

  1. arbitrators of future discussions with other contributors about the validity of your changes
  2. point of contact for evaluating the validity of your work
  3. person who verifies matching issues by others that should be closed.
  4. person who gives general guidance in fixing your tests

CONTRIBUTING.md

Read our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:

  1. PRs with issues not assigned to you will be closed by the reviewer
  2. Fix the first comment in the PR so that each issue listed automatically closes

Other

  1. 🎯 Please be considerate of our volunteers' time. Contacting the person who assigned the reviewers is not advised unless they ask for your input. Do not @ the person who did the assignment otherwise.
  2. Read the CONTRIBUTING.md file make

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 79a962b and 953c31d.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • test/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.test.ts (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
test/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.test.ts (1)
Learnt from: shivasankaran18
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-api#3175
File: test/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.test.ts:1-2
Timestamp: 2025-02-09T04:24:57.021Z
Learning: In test files for Talawa API, create a TestContext interface that extends GraphQLContext but overrides specific fields needed for mocking. Use the `satisfies` operator to ensure type safety of the mock implementations.
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
  • GitHub Check: Run tests for talawa api
  • GitHub Check: Analyse Code With CodeQL (typescript)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
test/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.test.ts (3)

8-27: LGTM! Well-structured TestContext interface.

The TestContext interface is well-defined with proper type safety and follows the established pattern for mocking GraphQLContext.


29-87: LGTM! Comprehensive mock setup with proper typing.

The mock setup is well-structured with:

  • Properly typed mock objects
  • Complete context properties
  • Appropriate use of vi.fn() for function mocking

1-6: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)

Sort and group imports for better organization.

Group and sort imports in the following order:

  1. External dependencies
  2. Test utilities
  3. Application imports
-import type { FastifyBaseLogger } from "fastify";
-import type { Client as MinioClient } from "minio";
-import { createMockLogger } from "test/utilities/mockLogger";
-import { beforeEach, describe, expect, it, vi } from "vitest";
-import type { GraphQLContext } from "~/src/graphql/context";
-import { updateAgendaItemResolver } from "~/src/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem";
+import type { FastifyBaseLogger } from "fastify";
+import type { Client as MinioClient } from "minio";
+import { beforeEach, describe, expect, it, vi } from "vitest";
+
+import { createMockLogger } from "test/utilities/mockLogger";
+
+import type { GraphQLContext } from "~/src/graphql/context";
+import { updateAgendaItemResolver } from "~/src/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem";

Likely invalid or redundant comment.

test/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.test.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 9, 2025

Our Pull Request Approval Process

Thanks for contributing!

Testing Your Code

Remember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:

  1. We don't merge PRs with poor code quality.
    1. Follow coding best practices such that CodeRabbit.ai approves your PR.
  2. We don't merge PRs with failed tests.
    1. When tests fail, click on the Details link to learn more.
    2. Write sufficient tests for your changes (CodeCov Patch Test). Your testing level must be better than the target threshold of the repository
    3. Tests may fail if you edit sensitive files. Ask to add the ignore-sensitive-files-pr label if the edits are necessary.
  3. We cannot merge PRs with conflicting files. These must be fixed.

Our policies make our code better.

Reviewers

Do not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
When your PR has been assigned reviewers contact them to get your code reviewed and approved via:

  1. comments in this PR or
  2. our slack channel

Reviewing Your Code

Your reviewer(s) will have the following roles:

  1. arbitrators of future discussions with other contributors about the validity of your changes
  2. point of contact for evaluating the validity of your work
  3. person who verifies matching issues by others that should be closed.
  4. person who gives general guidance in fixing your tests

CONTRIBUTING.md

Read our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:

  1. PRs with issues not assigned to you will be closed by the reviewer
  2. Fix the first comment in the PR so that each issue listed automatically closes

Other

  1. 🎯 Please be considerate of our volunteers' time. Contacting the person who assigned the reviewers is not advised unless they ask for your input. Do not @ the person who did the assignment otherwise.
  2. Read the CONTRIBUTING.md file make

coderabbitai[bot]
coderabbitai bot previously approved these changes Feb 9, 2025
@shivasankaran18
Copy link
Author

@coderabbitai full review

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 9, 2025

✅ Actions performed

Full review triggered.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 9, 2025

Our Pull Request Approval Process

Thanks for contributing!

Testing Your Code

Remember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:

  1. We don't merge PRs with poor code quality.
    1. Follow coding best practices such that CodeRabbit.ai approves your PR.
  2. We don't merge PRs with failed tests.
    1. When tests fail, click on the Details link to learn more.
    2. Write sufficient tests for your changes (CodeCov Patch Test). Your testing level must be better than the target threshold of the repository
    3. Tests may fail if you edit sensitive files. Ask to add the ignore-sensitive-files-pr label if the edits are necessary.
  3. We cannot merge PRs with conflicting files. These must be fixed.

Our policies make our code better.

Reviewers

Do not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
When your PR has been assigned reviewers contact them to get your code reviewed and approved via:

  1. comments in this PR or
  2. our slack channel

Reviewing Your Code

Your reviewer(s) will have the following roles:

  1. arbitrators of future discussions with other contributors about the validity of your changes
  2. point of contact for evaluating the validity of your work
  3. person who verifies matching issues by others that should be closed.
  4. person who gives general guidance in fixing your tests

CONTRIBUTING.md

Read our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:

  1. PRs with issues not assigned to you will be closed by the reviewer
  2. Fix the first comment in the PR so that each issue listed automatically closes

Other

  1. 🎯 Please be considerate of our volunteers' time. Contacting the person who assigned the reviewers is not advised unless they ask for your input. Do not @ the person who did the assignment otherwise.
  2. Read the CONTRIBUTING.md file make

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 953c31d and c101a94.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • test/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.test.ts (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
test/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.test.ts (1)
Learnt from: shivasankaran18
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-api#3175
File: test/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.test.ts:1-2
Timestamp: 2025-02-09T04:24:57.021Z
Learning: In test files for Talawa API, create a TestContext interface that extends GraphQLContext but overrides specific fields needed for mocking. Use the `satisfies` operator to ensure type safety of the mock implementations.
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
test/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.test.ts (2)

8-27: LGTM! Well-structured TestContext interface.

The TestContext interface correctly extends GraphQLContext and properly types the mock implementations.


29-84: LGTM! Comprehensive mock setup with proper typing.

The mock setup is well-structured with:

  • Properly typed Drizzle client mock
  • Complete context objects for both authenticated and unauthenticated scenarios
  • All required properties and mock functions

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 9, 2025

Our Pull Request Approval Process

Thanks for contributing!

Testing Your Code

Remember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:

  1. We don't merge PRs with poor code quality.
    1. Follow coding best practices such that CodeRabbit.ai approves your PR.
  2. We don't merge PRs with failed tests.
    1. When tests fail, click on the Details link to learn more.
    2. Write sufficient tests for your changes (CodeCov Patch Test). Your testing level must be better than the target threshold of the repository
    3. Tests may fail if you edit sensitive files. Ask to add the ignore-sensitive-files-pr label if the edits are necessary.
  3. We cannot merge PRs with conflicting files. These must be fixed.

Our policies make our code better.

Reviewers

Do not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
When your PR has been assigned reviewers contact them to get your code reviewed and approved via:

  1. comments in this PR or
  2. our slack channel

Reviewing Your Code

Your reviewer(s) will have the following roles:

  1. arbitrators of future discussions with other contributors about the validity of your changes
  2. point of contact for evaluating the validity of your work
  3. person who verifies matching issues by others that should be closed.
  4. person who gives general guidance in fixing your tests

CONTRIBUTING.md

Read our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:

  1. PRs with issues not assigned to you will be closed by the reviewer
  2. Fix the first comment in the PR so that each issue listed automatically closes

Other

  1. 🎯 Please be considerate of our volunteers' time. Contacting the person who assigned the reviewers is not advised unless they ask for your input. Do not @ the person who did the assignment otherwise.
  2. Read the CONTRIBUTING.md file make

coderabbitai[bot]
coderabbitai bot previously approved these changes Feb 9, 2025
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1da887f and 8ff042b.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • test/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.test.ts (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (1)
test/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.test.ts (2)
Learnt from: shivasankaran18
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-api#3175
File: test/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.test.ts:1-6
Timestamp: 2025-02-09T09:43:46.369Z
Learning: In the talawa-api project, maintain the existing import order as enforced by the code quality checks. Do not suggest reordering imports as it may conflict with the project's established code style.
Learnt from: shivasankaran18
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-api#3175
File: test/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.test.ts:1-2
Timestamp: 2025-02-09T04:24:57.021Z
Learning: In test files for Talawa API, create a TestContext interface that extends GraphQLContext but overrides specific fields needed for mocking. Use the `satisfies` operator to ensure type safety of the mock implementations.
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
  • GitHub Check: Run tests for talawa api
  • GitHub Check: Analyse Code With CodeQL (typescript)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
test/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.test.ts (1)

1-84: LGTM! Well-structured test setup with proper typing.

The test setup follows best practices:

  • TestContext interface properly extends GraphQLContext
  • Mock implementations use proper return type definitions
  • Context objects include all required fields

test/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.test.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link

Our Pull Request Approval Process

Thanks for contributing!

Testing Your Code

Remember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:

  1. We don't merge PRs with poor code quality.
    1. Follow coding best practices such that CodeRabbit.ai approves your PR.
  2. We don't merge PRs with failed tests.
    1. When tests fail, click on the Details link to learn more.
    2. Write sufficient tests for your changes (CodeCov Patch Test). Your testing level must be better than the target threshold of the repository
    3. Tests may fail if you edit sensitive files. Ask to add the ignore-sensitive-files-pr label if the edits are necessary.
  3. We cannot merge PRs with conflicting files. These must be fixed.

Our policies make our code better.

Reviewers

Do not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
When your PR has been assigned reviewers contact them to get your code reviewed and approved via:

  1. comments in this PR or
  2. our slack channel

Reviewing Your Code

Your reviewer(s) will have the following roles:

  1. arbitrators of future discussions with other contributors about the validity of your changes
  2. point of contact for evaluating the validity of your work
  3. person who verifies matching issues by others that should be closed.
  4. person who gives general guidance in fixing your tests

CONTRIBUTING.md

Read our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:

  1. PRs with issues not assigned to you will be closed by the reviewer
  2. Fix the first comment in the PR so that each issue listed automatically closes

Other

  1. 🎯 Please be considerate of our volunteers' time. Contacting the person who assigned the reviewers is not advised unless they ask for your input. Do not @ the person who did the assignment otherwise.
  2. Read the CONTRIBUTING.md file make

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8ff042b and e206c93.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • test/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.test.ts (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (2)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: shivasankaran18
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-api#3175
File: src/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.ts:46-84
Timestamp: 2025-02-08T11:15:47.878Z
Learning: When creating GraphQL mutation resolvers in Talawa API, ensure the resolver function's type signature matches the GraphQL schema types exactly, especially for nullable fields. The context parameter should be typed as `GraphQLContext` imported from "~/src/graphql/context".
test/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.test.ts (2)
Learnt from: shivasankaran18
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-api#3175
File: test/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.test.ts:1-6
Timestamp: 2025-02-09T09:43:46.369Z
Learning: In the talawa-api project, maintain the existing import order as enforced by the code quality checks. Do not suggest reordering imports as it may conflict with the project's established code style.
Learnt from: shivasankaran18
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-api#3175
File: test/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.test.ts:1-2
Timestamp: 2025-02-09T04:24:57.021Z
Learning: In test files for Talawa API, create a TestContext interface that extends GraphQLContext but overrides specific fields needed for mocking. Use the `satisfies` operator to ensure type safety of the mock implementations.
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
  • GitHub Check: Run tests for talawa api
  • GitHub Check: Analyse Code With CodeQL (typescript)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
test/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.test.ts (3)

1-85: LGTM! Well-structured test setup with proper typing.

The test setup follows best practices with:

  • Properly defined TestContext interface
  • Well-typed mock objects
  • Comprehensive context configurations

86-551: LGTM! Comprehensive test coverage with well-structured assertions.

The test suite thoroughly covers:

  • Authentication validation
  • Input validation
  • User existence checks
  • Authorization checks
  • Error conditions
  • Success cases
  • Edge cases

646-720: LGTM! Keep these test cases for specific line coverage.

These test cases provide independent coverage for lines 80 and 90 by testing duration and key validation separately.

test/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.test.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link

Our Pull Request Approval Process

Thanks for contributing!

Testing Your Code

Remember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:

  1. We don't merge PRs with poor code quality.
    1. Follow coding best practices such that CodeRabbit.ai approves your PR.
  2. We don't merge PRs with failed tests.
    1. When tests fail, click on the Details link to learn more.
    2. Write sufficient tests for your changes (CodeCov Patch Test). Your testing level must be better than the target threshold of the repository
    3. Tests may fail if you edit sensitive files. Ask to add the ignore-sensitive-files-pr label if the edits are necessary.
  3. We cannot merge PRs with conflicting files. These must be fixed.

Our policies make our code better.

Reviewers

Do not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
When your PR has been assigned reviewers contact them to get your code reviewed and approved via:

  1. comments in this PR or
  2. our slack channel

Reviewing Your Code

Your reviewer(s) will have the following roles:

  1. arbitrators of future discussions with other contributors about the validity of your changes
  2. point of contact for evaluating the validity of your work
  3. person who verifies matching issues by others that should be closed.
  4. person who gives general guidance in fixing your tests

CONTRIBUTING.md

Read our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:

  1. PRs with issues not assigned to you will be closed by the reviewer
  2. Fix the first comment in the PR so that each issue listed automatically closes

Other

  1. 🎯 Please be considerate of our volunteers' time. Contacting the person who assigned the reviewers is not advised unless they ask for your input. Do not @ the person who did the assignment otherwise.
  2. Read the CONTRIBUTING.md file make

@shivasankaran18
Copy link
Author

@coderabbitai full review

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 10, 2025

✅ Actions performed

Full review triggered.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 3

♻️ Duplicate comments (2)
src/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.ts (2)

115-164: Consolidate repeated checks for note-type items.
These consecutive forbidden checks repeat logic. You can unify them into a single conditional block for better readability and maintenance.

Here's an example refactor:

 if (existingAgendaItem.type === "note") {
-  if (parsedArgs.input.duration !== undefined && parsedArgs.input.key !== undefined) {
-    ...
-  }
-  if (parsedArgs.input.duration !== undefined) {
-    ...
-  }
-  if (parsedArgs.input.key !== undefined) {
-    ...
-  }
+  const invalidFields = [];
+  if (parsedArgs.input.duration !== undefined) {
+    invalidFields.push({...});
+  }
+  if (parsedArgs.input.key !== undefined) {
+    invalidFields.push({...});
+  }
+  if (invalidFields.length > 0) {
+    throw new TalawaGraphQLError({
+      extensions: {
+        code: "forbidden_action_on_arguments_associated_resources",
+        issues: invalidFields,
+      },
+    });
+  }
 }

166-182: Refactor repeated checks for general/scripture items.

Similar to note-type checks, consider unifying the logic in a helper or single conditional block if needed. This avoids multiple throw statements and makes future updates more straightforward.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9892675 and 091f5be.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • src/graphql/inputs/MutationUpdateAgendaItemInput.ts (2 hunks)
  • src/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.ts (1 hunks)
  • test/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.test.ts (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (4)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: shivasankaran18
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-api#3175
File: src/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.ts:46-84
Timestamp: 2025-02-08T11:15:47.878Z
Learning: When creating GraphQL mutation resolvers in Talawa API, ensure the resolver function's type signature matches the GraphQL schema types exactly, especially for nullable fields. The context parameter should be typed as `GraphQLContext` imported from "~/src/graphql/context".
src/graphql/inputs/MutationUpdateAgendaItemInput.ts (2)
Learnt from: shivasankaran18
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-api#3175
File: src/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.ts:46-84
Timestamp: 2025-02-08T11:11:26.456Z
Learning: When using Drizzle ORM's where clauses, let TypeScript infer the types from the table schema instead of explicitly typing the fields and operators parameters. The types are automatically inferred from the table definition.
Learnt from: shivasankaran18
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-api#3175
File: src/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.ts:46-84
Timestamp: 2025-02-08T11:19:42.430Z
Learning: When implementing GraphQL resolvers in Talawa API that interact with database fields that allow null values, use the input type from the GraphQL schema (e.g., `MutationUpdateAgendaItemInput`) rather than inferring types from the database schema to ensure proper type handling between GraphQL and the database layer.
src/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.ts (3)
Learnt from: shivasankaran18
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-api#3175
File: src/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.ts:46-84
Timestamp: 2025-02-08T11:15:47.878Z
Learning: When creating GraphQL mutation resolvers in Talawa API, ensure the resolver function's type signature matches the GraphQL schema types exactly, especially for nullable fields. The context parameter should be typed as `GraphQLContext` imported from "~/src/graphql/context".
Learnt from: shivasankaran18
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-api#3175
File: src/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.ts:46-84
Timestamp: 2025-02-08T11:19:42.430Z
Learning: When implementing GraphQL resolvers in Talawa API that interact with database fields that allow null values, use the input type from the GraphQL schema (e.g., `MutationUpdateAgendaItemInput`) rather than inferring types from the database schema to ensure proper type handling between GraphQL and the database layer.
Learnt from: shivasankaran18
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-api#3175
File: src/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.ts:46-84
Timestamp: 2025-02-08T11:11:26.456Z
Learning: When using Drizzle ORM's where clauses, let TypeScript infer the types from the table schema instead of explicitly typing the fields and operators parameters. The types are automatically inferred from the table definition.
test/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.test.ts (2)
Learnt from: shivasankaran18
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-api#3175
File: test/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.test.ts:1-6
Timestamp: 2025-02-09T09:43:46.369Z
Learning: In the talawa-api project, maintain the existing import order as enforced by the code quality checks. Do not suggest reordering imports as it may conflict with the project's established code style.
Learnt from: shivasankaran18
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-api#3175
File: test/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.test.ts:1-2
Timestamp: 2025-02-09T04:24:57.021Z
Learning: In test files for Talawa API, create a TestContext interface that extends GraphQLContext but overrides specific fields needed for mocking. Use the `satisfies` operator to ensure type safety of the mock implementations.
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
src/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.ts

[warning] 80-80: src/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.ts#L80
Added line #L80 was not covered by tests


[warning] 90-90: src/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.ts#L90
Added line #L90 was not covered by tests


[warning] 243-243: src/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.ts#L243
Added line #L243 was not covered by tests

🔇 Additional comments (12)
test/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.test.ts (2)

86-90: Good usage of beforeEach for resetting mocks.

Initializing and resetting mocks in the beforeEach block prevents tests from interfering with each other. This approach helps ensure reliable and deterministic test outcomes.


645-720: Targeted coverage tests for lines 80 and 90 look good.

These two tests isolate and verify forbidden duration and key fields on note-type agenda items individually, ensuring code coverage for lines 80 and 90. They effectively confirm that each forbidden field triggers the correct error response.

src/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.ts (8)

5-8: Type imports look good.

Using type { GraphQLContext } is consistent with best practices for type-only imports in TypeScript. This approach avoids polluting the runtime namespace and clarifies the usage of GraphQLContext.


14-15: Schema definition naming is consistent.

Defining the local mutationUpdateAgendaItemArgumentsSchema with input: MutationUpdateAgendaItemInputSchema is a clear way to keep the code organized and consistent with the rest of the codebase.


18-31: Resolver signature alignment.

The resolver function now properly aligns with the GraphQL schema's typed arguments. This helps prevent run-time type mismatches and improves maintainability.


32-38: Authentication check is correct.

The unauthenticated error ensures that only signed-in users can proceed, which is crucial for preserving data integrity.


46-56: Invalid arguments error handling is well-structured.

Mapping error.issues to a structured format clarifies which arguments failed validation. This is a best practice for returning actionable error responses to the client.


80-80: Add or expand test coverage for lines 80, 90, and 243.

The static analysis hints indicate these lines might be missing coverage. Consider adding test scenarios that specifically:

  1. Verifies membership-based queries (line 80).
  2. Exercises the condition where agenda item ID is checked (line 90).
  3. Tests the scenario where user role checks fail with “administrator” (line 243).

Would you like assistance creating a test script or code snippet covering these lines?

Also applies to: 90-90, 243-243

🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch

[warning] 80-80: src/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.ts#L80
Added line #L80 was not covered by tests


257-280: Good final update logic.

The updated record is returned and validated. This ensures an immediate failure if no rows were updated, preventing silent data inconsistencies.


282-295: Mutation field registration is cohesive.

Referring to updateAgendaItemResolver in the builder call is a clear way to separate your schema building from the business logic, improving maintainability and code clarity.

src/graphql/inputs/MutationUpdateAgendaItemInput.ts (2)

5-5: Clear introduction of optional fields with accurate validation.

Renaming and refining the schema to MutationUpdateAgendaItemInputSchema while making folderId and name optional is consistent with the use case where not all fields need to be updated.


25-25: Improved type inference for the inputRef.

Using z.infer<typeof MutationUpdateAgendaItemInputSchema> ensures that any changes in your Zod schema automatically reflect in the GraphQL input type, reducing maintenance overhead.

test/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.test.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link

Our Pull Request Approval Process

Thanks for contributing!

Testing Your Code

Remember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:

  1. We don't merge PRs with poor code quality.
    1. Follow coding best practices such that CodeRabbit.ai approves your PR.
  2. We don't merge PRs with failed tests.
    1. When tests fail, click on the Details link to learn more.
    2. Write sufficient tests for your changes (CodeCov Patch Test). Your testing level must be better than the target threshold of the repository
    3. Tests may fail if you edit sensitive files. Ask to add the ignore-sensitive-files-pr label if the edits are necessary.
  3. We cannot merge PRs with conflicting files. These must be fixed.

Our policies make our code better.

Reviewers

Do not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
When your PR has been assigned reviewers contact them to get your code reviewed and approved via:

  1. comments in this PR or
  2. our slack channel

Reviewing Your Code

Your reviewer(s) will have the following roles:

  1. arbitrators of future discussions with other contributors about the validity of your changes
  2. point of contact for evaluating the validity of your work
  3. person who verifies matching issues by others that should be closed.
  4. person who gives general guidance in fixing your tests

CONTRIBUTING.md

Read our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:

  1. PRs with issues not assigned to you will be closed by the reviewer
  2. Fix the first comment in the PR so that each issue listed automatically closes

Other

  1. 🎯 Please be considerate of our volunteers' time. Contacting the person who assigned the reviewers is not advised unless they ask for your input. Do not @ the person who did the assignment otherwise.
  2. Read the CONTRIBUTING.md file make

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 6

♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
src/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.ts (1)

115-164: Consolidate repeated checks for note-type restrictions.

Multiple blocks are used to forbid duration and key for agenda items of type "note". Merging them into a single check or helper method can reduce duplication and make the logic more maintainable.

if (existingAgendaItem.type === "note") {
  const invalidFields = [];
  if (parsedArgs.input.duration !== undefined) {
    invalidFields.push({
      argumentPath: ["input", "duration"],
      message: `Cannot be provided for an agenda item of type "note"`,
    });
  }
  if (parsedArgs.input.key !== undefined) {
    invalidFields.push({
      argumentPath: ["input", "key"],
      message: `Cannot be provided for an agenda item of type "note"`,
    });
  }
  if (invalidFields.length > 0) {
    throw new TalawaGraphQLError({
      extensions: {
        code: "forbidden_action_on_arguments_associated_resources",
        issues: invalidFields,
      },
    });
  }
}
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

	if (existingAgendaItem.type === "note") {
		const invalidFields = [];
		if (parsedArgs.input.duration !== undefined) {
			invalidFields.push({
				argumentPath: ["input", "duration"],
				message: `Cannot be provided for an agenda item of type "note"`,
			});
		}
		if (parsedArgs.input.key !== undefined) {
			invalidFields.push({
				argumentPath: ["input", "key"],
				message: `Cannot be provided for an agenda item of type "note"`,
			});
		}
		if (invalidFields.length > 0) {
			throw new TalawaGraphQLError({
				extensions: {
					code: "forbidden_action_on_arguments_associated_resources",
					issues: invalidFields,
				},
			});
		}
	}
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 091f5be and 60fac91.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • src/graphql/inputs/MutationUpdateAgendaItemInput.ts (2 hunks)
  • src/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.ts (1 hunks)
  • test/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.test.ts (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (4)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: shivasankaran18
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-api#3175
File: src/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.ts:46-84
Timestamp: 2025-02-08T11:15:47.878Z
Learning: When creating GraphQL mutation resolvers in Talawa API, ensure the resolver function's type signature matches the GraphQL schema types exactly, especially for nullable fields. The context parameter should be typed as `GraphQLContext` imported from "~/src/graphql/context".
src/graphql/inputs/MutationUpdateAgendaItemInput.ts (2)
Learnt from: shivasankaran18
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-api#3175
File: src/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.ts:46-84
Timestamp: 2025-02-08T11:11:26.456Z
Learning: When using Drizzle ORM's where clauses, let TypeScript infer the types from the table schema instead of explicitly typing the fields and operators parameters. The types are automatically inferred from the table definition.
Learnt from: shivasankaran18
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-api#3175
File: src/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.ts:46-84
Timestamp: 2025-02-08T11:19:42.430Z
Learning: When implementing GraphQL resolvers in Talawa API that interact with database fields that allow null values, use the input type from the GraphQL schema (e.g., `MutationUpdateAgendaItemInput`) rather than inferring types from the database schema to ensure proper type handling between GraphQL and the database layer.
src/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.ts (3)
Learnt from: shivasankaran18
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-api#3175
File: src/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.ts:46-84
Timestamp: 2025-02-08T11:15:47.878Z
Learning: When creating GraphQL mutation resolvers in Talawa API, ensure the resolver function's type signature matches the GraphQL schema types exactly, especially for nullable fields. The context parameter should be typed as `GraphQLContext` imported from "~/src/graphql/context".
Learnt from: shivasankaran18
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-api#3175
File: src/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.ts:46-84
Timestamp: 2025-02-08T11:19:42.430Z
Learning: When implementing GraphQL resolvers in Talawa API that interact with database fields that allow null values, use the input type from the GraphQL schema (e.g., `MutationUpdateAgendaItemInput`) rather than inferring types from the database schema to ensure proper type handling between GraphQL and the database layer.
Learnt from: shivasankaran18
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-api#3175
File: src/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.ts:46-84
Timestamp: 2025-02-08T11:11:26.456Z
Learning: When using Drizzle ORM's where clauses, let TypeScript infer the types from the table schema instead of explicitly typing the fields and operators parameters. The types are automatically inferred from the table definition.
test/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.test.ts (2)
Learnt from: shivasankaran18
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-api#3175
File: test/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.test.ts:1-6
Timestamp: 2025-02-09T09:43:46.369Z
Learning: In the talawa-api project, maintain the existing import order as enforced by the code quality checks. Do not suggest reordering imports as it may conflict with the project's established code style.
Learnt from: shivasankaran18
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-api#3175
File: test/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.test.ts:1-2
Timestamp: 2025-02-09T04:24:57.021Z
Learning: In test files for Talawa API, create a TestContext interface that extends GraphQLContext but overrides specific fields needed for mocking. Use the `satisfies` operator to ensure type safety of the mock implementations.
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
  • GitHub Check: Run tests for talawa api
  • GitHub Check: Analyse Code With CodeQL (typescript)
🔇 Additional comments (16)
test/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.test.ts (2)

819-865: Confirm necessity of the combined duration+key test for note-type.

This block specifically covers lines 80, 90 in the resolver, but it may overlap with the scenario tested at lines [232-277] and [683-730]. If it’s specifically for code coverage, that’s acceptable. Otherwise, consider consolidating these overlap tests into a single parameterized block to avoid duplication.


775-817: Concurrent deletion simulation looks correct.

Mocking the database update to return an empty array effectively tests a scenario in which the agenda item is removed just before the update completes, ensuring the code handles unexpected situations. This helps capture edge cases of stale records.

src/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.ts (12)

5-5: Use of import type for context is appropriate.

Importing the type ensures no runtime overhead for the GraphQLContext, improving maintainability and clarity.


8-8: Consistent usage of MutationUpdateAgendaItemInputSchema is a good step forward.

Referencing the updated schema name (MutationUpdateAgendaItemInputSchema) aligns with the codebase's naming convention and ensures the correct input type is enforced.

Also applies to: 15-15


18-38: Check for null acceptance in typed arguments.

While the function signature properly states string | null | undefined for certain fields, ensure your GraphQL schema also reflects the possibility of null. Mismatch between the resolver’s type and the GraphQL field definition (which might only allow string or undefined) can lead to runtime errors or type-check differences.


40-44: Validation approach is solid.

Using safeParse from Zod to parse and validate arguments is a reliable approach, providing clear separation of valid/invalid inputs.


46-56: Error construction flows well.

Generating a TalawaGraphQLError with a custom code and mapped issues is a clean and standardized way to handle validation errors.


58-65: Parallel queries can be beneficial.

Running Promise.all to load both the user and agenda item in parallel helps performance; just ensure that partial failures do not leave the code in a half-loaded state. Currently, the next checks (lines 94–113) handle undefined results well, so this is fine.


66-88: Comprehensive data loading is commendable.

Leveraging .with for nested relationships ensures all relevant data (folder > event > organization > membership) is loaded in a single query, reducing round trips. However, keep an eye on performance if deeper nesting or large datasets are expected.


94-113: Correctly handling missing user or agenda item.

Immediate throwing of errors for non-existent user or agenda item is straightforward and prevents complicated null checks further down the line.


166-182: Appropriate validation for key usage.

For general / scripture types, forbidding the key field is handled neatly, mirroring the logic for note items.


236-255: Straightforward role-based authorization.

Checking if the user or their membership role is "administrator" is clear. Should additional roles or hierarchical permissions be introduced, consider a more flexible permission design.


257-279: Clean update logic with fallback check.

Performing the update and verifying the returned row ensures safety against concurrency issues or unexpected row removal. No issues here.


282-295: Mutation field definition is structured effectively.

Registering the field correctly and referencing the new resolver function completes a clean, modular design.

src/graphql/inputs/MutationUpdateAgendaItemInput.ts (2)

5-22: Good extension of the base insert schema.

Renaming to MutationUpdateAgendaItemInputSchema and allowing optional fields (e.g., folderId, name) aligns well with partial updates. The .refine() call to ensure at least one field is provided is a nice validation detail.


25-25: Proper type binding via z.infer.

Using inputRef<z.infer<typeof MutationUpdateAgendaItemInputSchema>> ensures that any schema changes propagate accurately to the type definition. This reduces the risk of schema-type divergence.

test/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.test.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
test/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.test.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
test/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.test.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
test/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.test.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link

Our Pull Request Approval Process

Thanks for contributing!

Testing Your Code

Remember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:

  1. We don't merge PRs with poor code quality.
    1. Follow coding best practices such that CodeRabbit.ai approves your PR.
  2. We don't merge PRs with failed tests.
    1. When tests fail, click on the Details link to learn more.
    2. Write sufficient tests for your changes (CodeCov Patch Test). Your testing level must be better than the target threshold of the repository
    3. Tests may fail if you edit sensitive files. Ask to add the ignore-sensitive-files-pr label if the edits are necessary.
  3. We cannot merge PRs with conflicting files. These must be fixed.

Our policies make our code better.

Reviewers

Do not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
When your PR has been assigned reviewers contact them to get your code reviewed and approved via:

  1. comments in this PR or
  2. our slack channel

Reviewing Your Code

Your reviewer(s) will have the following roles:

  1. arbitrators of future discussions with other contributors about the validity of your changes
  2. point of contact for evaluating the validity of your work
  3. person who verifies matching issues by others that should be closed.
  4. person who gives general guidance in fixing your tests

CONTRIBUTING.md

Read our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:

  1. PRs with issues not assigned to you will be closed by the reviewer
  2. Fix the first comment in the PR so that each issue listed automatically closes

Other

  1. 🎯 Please be considerate of our volunteers' time. Contacting the person who assigned the reviewers is not advised unless they ask for your input. Do not @ the person who did the assignment otherwise.
  2. Read the CONTRIBUTING.md file make

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 60fac91 and db27383.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • test/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.test.ts (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (2)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: shivasankaran18
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-api#3175
File: src/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.ts:46-84
Timestamp: 2025-02-08T11:15:47.878Z
Learning: When creating GraphQL mutation resolvers in Talawa API, ensure the resolver function's type signature matches the GraphQL schema types exactly, especially for nullable fields. The context parameter should be typed as `GraphQLContext` imported from "~/src/graphql/context".
test/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.test.ts (3)
Learnt from: shivasankaran18
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-api#3175
File: test/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.test.ts:46-46
Timestamp: 2025-02-10T17:58:51.912Z
Learning: When mocking objects in TypeScript tests, prefer explicit type annotations (e.g., `const mock: ExpectedType = {...}`) over type assertions with `as unknown as` to maintain type safety and catch potential type mismatches at compile time.
Learnt from: shivasankaran18
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-api#3175
File: test/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.test.ts:1-6
Timestamp: 2025-02-09T09:43:46.369Z
Learning: In the talawa-api project, maintain the existing import order as enforced by the code quality checks. Do not suggest reordering imports as it may conflict with the project's established code style.
Learnt from: shivasankaran18
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-api#3175
File: test/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.test.ts:1-2
Timestamp: 2025-02-09T04:24:57.021Z
Learning: In test files for Talawa API, create a TestContext interface that extends GraphQLContext but overrides specific fields needed for mocking. Use the `satisfies` operator to ensure type safety of the mock implementations.
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
  • GitHub Check: Run tests for talawa api
  • GitHub Check: Analyse Code With CodeQL (typescript)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
test/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.test.ts (5)

8-24: LGTM! Well-structured mock interfaces.

The separation of MockDrizzleClient and TestContext interfaces is clean and promotes reusability.

Also applies to: 26-30


89-805: LGTM! Comprehensive test coverage with well-structured assertions.

The test suite thoroughly covers:

  • Authentication validation
  • Input validation
  • User existence checks
  • Authorization checks
  • Error conditions
  • Success cases
  • Edge cases

Each test case has proper setup, execution, and assertions.


670-760: Well-organized note-type validation tests.

Good use of describe block and beforeEach setup to group related tests and reduce code duplication.


235-288: Good use of parameterized tests.

The it.each pattern is a great way to test multiple scenarios with different inputs and expected outcomes.


94-99: LGTM! Clear test documentation.

Good use of JSDoc comments to explain the test's purpose and expected behavior.

@shivasankaran18
Copy link
Author

@coderabbitai full review

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 10, 2025

✅ Actions performed

Full review triggered.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 8

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9892675 and db27383.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • src/graphql/inputs/MutationUpdateAgendaItemInput.ts (2 hunks)
  • src/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.ts (1 hunks)
  • test/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.test.ts (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (4)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: shivasankaran18
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-api#3175
File: src/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.ts:46-84
Timestamp: 2025-02-08T11:15:47.878Z
Learning: When creating GraphQL mutation resolvers in Talawa API, ensure the resolver function's type signature matches the GraphQL schema types exactly, especially for nullable fields. The context parameter should be typed as `GraphQLContext` imported from "~/src/graphql/context".
src/graphql/inputs/MutationUpdateAgendaItemInput.ts (2)
Learnt from: shivasankaran18
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-api#3175
File: src/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.ts:46-84
Timestamp: 2025-02-08T11:11:26.456Z
Learning: When using Drizzle ORM's where clauses, let TypeScript infer the types from the table schema instead of explicitly typing the fields and operators parameters. The types are automatically inferred from the table definition.
Learnt from: shivasankaran18
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-api#3175
File: src/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.ts:46-84
Timestamp: 2025-02-08T11:19:42.430Z
Learning: When implementing GraphQL resolvers in Talawa API that interact with database fields that allow null values, use the input type from the GraphQL schema (e.g., `MutationUpdateAgendaItemInput`) rather than inferring types from the database schema to ensure proper type handling between GraphQL and the database layer.
src/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.ts (3)
Learnt from: shivasankaran18
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-api#3175
File: src/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.ts:46-84
Timestamp: 2025-02-08T11:15:47.878Z
Learning: When creating GraphQL mutation resolvers in Talawa API, ensure the resolver function's type signature matches the GraphQL schema types exactly, especially for nullable fields. The context parameter should be typed as `GraphQLContext` imported from "~/src/graphql/context".
Learnt from: shivasankaran18
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-api#3175
File: src/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.ts:46-84
Timestamp: 2025-02-08T11:19:42.430Z
Learning: When implementing GraphQL resolvers in Talawa API that interact with database fields that allow null values, use the input type from the GraphQL schema (e.g., `MutationUpdateAgendaItemInput`) rather than inferring types from the database schema to ensure proper type handling between GraphQL and the database layer.
Learnt from: shivasankaran18
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-api#3175
File: src/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.ts:46-84
Timestamp: 2025-02-08T11:11:26.456Z
Learning: When using Drizzle ORM's where clauses, let TypeScript infer the types from the table schema instead of explicitly typing the fields and operators parameters. The types are automatically inferred from the table definition.
test/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.test.ts (4)
Learnt from: shivasankaran18
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-api#3175
File: test/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.test.ts:46-46
Timestamp: 2025-02-10T17:58:51.912Z
Learning: When mocking objects in TypeScript tests, prefer explicit type annotations (e.g., `const mock: ExpectedType = {...}`) over type assertions with `as unknown as` to maintain type safety and catch potential type mismatches at compile time.
Learnt from: shivasankaran18
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-api#3175
File: test/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.test.ts:49-49
Timestamp: 2025-02-10T18:31:58.540Z
Learning: In test files, using `as unknown as` type assertion for mock objects is acceptable when the mock doesn't need to implement the full interface, especially when dealing with complex types like database clients.
Learnt from: shivasankaran18
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-api#3175
File: test/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.test.ts:1-6
Timestamp: 2025-02-09T09:43:46.369Z
Learning: In the talawa-api project, maintain the existing import order as enforced by the code quality checks. Do not suggest reordering imports as it may conflict with the project's established code style.
Learnt from: shivasankaran18
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-api#3175
File: test/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.test.ts:1-2
Timestamp: 2025-02-09T04:24:57.021Z
Learning: In test files for Talawa API, create a TestContext interface that extends GraphQLContext but overrides specific fields needed for mocking. Use the `satisfies` operator to ensure type safety of the mock implementations.
🔇 Additional comments (13)
test/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.test.ts (3)

27-30: Interface merging might cause subtle type overrides.

Merging MockDrizzleClient with GraphQLContext["drizzleClient"] can sometimes mask type mismatches if properties in both interfaces collide. Consider assigning the mock directly to a typed variable or using a distinct property name in TestContext so you explicitly see any conflicts.


235-288: Good use of parameterized tests.

Using it.each is an efficient approach to cover multiple invalid field combinations for note-type agenda items. This ensures thorough coverage without duplicating test logic.


653-668: Well-structured helper for note-type agenda items.

Extracting setup logic into setupNoteTypeAgendaItemTest is a neat approach to DRY up the code. It clarifies test intentions and reduces overhead in each test block.

src/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.ts (8)

5-5: Good use of type-only import.

Importing GraphQLContext as a type helps reduce bundle size and improves clarity about which imports are used at runtime vs. type-check time.


8-8: Ensure naming consistency across imports.

Referencing MutationUpdateAgendaItemInputSchema maintains clarity and ensures the naming aligns with your new exported schema.


14-16: Schema helps isolate input validation.

Defining mutationUpdateAgendaItemArgumentsSchema with a nested input property enhances code readability and ensures the correct input structure before proceeding to resolver logic. Great use of Zod for validation!


18-38: Authentication guard looks good.

Your updateAgendaItemResolver appropriately checks ctx.currentClient.isAuthenticated early, returning an "unauthenticated" error if needed. This pattern is straightforward and prevents unauthorized operations.


40-56: Effective argument parsing and validation.

Using safeParse ensures any invalid input short-circuits with a descriptive error. This step properly centralizes argument validation and streamlines subsequent logic.


58-114: Robust checks for user and agenda item existence.

Both the user and item are retrieved in parallel. Missing resources lead to early errors, preventing further invalid database updates. This avoids potential null reference issues downstream.


257-280: Update operation and final existence check are correct.

The final fallback error for an undefined updatedAgendaItem is a good safeguard, preventing silent failures when the update does not persist. Consider optimistic concurrency if multiple updates could collide in your domain.


282-295: Mutation field registration aligns well with the new resolver.

Linking the updateAgendaItemResolver here is consistent, and referencing AgendaItem as the return type completes the GraphQL schema definition gracefully.

src/graphql/inputs/MutationUpdateAgendaItemInput.ts (2)

5-22: Clear extension of the original schema with mandatory ID.

Changing the schema name to MutationUpdateAgendaItemInputSchema and adding optional fields (folderId, name) while requiring one optional argument fosters flexible yet controlled updates. The .refine() check ensures at least one field must be given.


25-25: Accurate use of Zod inference for the input type.

The .inputRef<z.infer<typeof MutationUpdateAgendaItemInputSchema>> pattern correctly synchronizes the schema’s runtime validation with TypeScript’s static typing, maintaining robust type safety.

Copy link

Our Pull Request Approval Process

Thanks for contributing!

Testing Your Code

Remember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:

  1. We don't merge PRs with poor code quality.
    1. Follow coding best practices such that CodeRabbit.ai approves your PR.
  2. We don't merge PRs with failed tests.
    1. When tests fail, click on the Details link to learn more.
    2. Write sufficient tests for your changes (CodeCov Patch Test). Your testing level must be better than the target threshold of the repository
    3. Tests may fail if you edit sensitive files. Ask to add the ignore-sensitive-files-pr label if the edits are necessary.
  3. We cannot merge PRs with conflicting files. These must be fixed.

Our policies make our code better.

Reviewers

Do not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
When your PR has been assigned reviewers contact them to get your code reviewed and approved via:

  1. comments in this PR or
  2. our slack channel

Reviewing Your Code

Your reviewer(s) will have the following roles:

  1. arbitrators of future discussions with other contributors about the validity of your changes
  2. point of contact for evaluating the validity of your work
  3. person who verifies matching issues by others that should be closed.
  4. person who gives general guidance in fixing your tests

CONTRIBUTING.md

Read our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:

  1. PRs with issues not assigned to you will be closed by the reviewer
  2. Fix the first comment in the PR so that each issue listed automatically closes

Other

  1. 🎯 Please be considerate of our volunteers' time. Contacting the person who assigned the reviewers is not advised unless they ask for your input. Do not @ the person who did the assignment otherwise.
  2. Read the CONTRIBUTING.md file make

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between db27383 and 97ed0e4.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • test/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.test.ts (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (2)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: shivasankaran18
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-api#3175
File: src/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.ts:46-84
Timestamp: 2025-02-08T11:15:47.878Z
Learning: When creating GraphQL mutation resolvers in Talawa API, ensure the resolver function's type signature matches the GraphQL schema types exactly, especially for nullable fields. The context parameter should be typed as `GraphQLContext` imported from "~/src/graphql/context".
test/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.test.ts (10)
Learnt from: shivasankaran18
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-api#3175
File: test/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.test.ts:762-804
Timestamp: 2025-02-10T18:58:43.515Z
Learning: In Talawa API tests, when mocking MinioClient and its methods aren't used in the test, prefer using a simple type cast `{} as MinioClient` over explicitly mocking individual methods for better code maintainability.
Learnt from: shivasankaran18
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-api#3175
File: test/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.test.ts:33-49
Timestamp: 2025-02-10T18:57:27.311Z
Learning: In test/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.test.ts, while a global mock setup is used for the drizzle client, an alternative approach is to use specialized mocks initialized in beforeEach for each test scenario to reduce global state and ensure test isolation. However, this requires careful type handling to maintain type safety.
Learnt from: shivasankaran18
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-api#3175
File: test/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.test.ts:762-804
Timestamp: 2025-02-10T18:48:44.424Z
Learning: For the Talawa API codebase, testing composite role scenarios (multiple roles per user, cross-organization permissions) is not considered essential, as the focus is on basic role-based authorization testing.
Learnt from: shivasankaran18
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-api#3175
File: test/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.test.ts:62-79
Timestamp: 2025-02-10T18:48:15.739Z
Learning: When mocking GraphQLContext in tests, keep the minio property with minimal implementation to satisfy TypeScript types, even if minio operations aren't used in the specific resolver being tested.
Learnt from: shivasankaran18
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-api#3175
File: test/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.test.ts:46-46
Timestamp: 2025-02-10T17:58:51.912Z
Learning: When mocking objects in TypeScript tests, prefer explicit type annotations (e.g., `const mock: ExpectedType = {...}`) over type assertions with `as unknown as` to maintain type safety and catch potential type mismatches at compile time.
Learnt from: shivasankaran18
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-api#3175
File: test/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.test.ts:1-2
Timestamp: 2025-02-09T04:24:57.021Z
Learning: In test files for Talawa API, create a TestContext interface that extends GraphQLContext but overrides specific fields needed for mocking. Use the `satisfies` operator to ensure type safety of the mock implementations.
Learnt from: shivasankaran18
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-api#3175
File: test/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.test.ts:49-49
Timestamp: 2025-02-10T18:31:58.540Z
Learning: In test files, using `as unknown as` type assertion for mock objects is acceptable when the mock doesn't need to implement the full interface, especially when dealing with complex types like database clients.
Learnt from: shivasankaran18
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-api#3175
File: test/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.test.ts:8-24
Timestamp: 2025-02-10T18:40:01.230Z
Learning: In test files for Talawa API, mock interfaces should include explicit return type definitions that match the expected database schema to ensure type safety and catch potential issues during testing.
Learnt from: shivasankaran18
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-api#3175
File: test/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.test.ts:1-6
Timestamp: 2025-02-09T09:43:46.369Z
Learning: In the talawa-api project, maintain the existing import order as enforced by the code quality checks. Do not suggest reordering imports as it may conflict with the project's established code style.
Learnt from: shivasankaran18
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-api#3175
File: src/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.ts:184-234
Timestamp: 2025-02-10T18:41:02.108Z
Learning: In Talawa API, folder validation logic for agenda items should be abstracted into a utility function that checks for folder existence, event alignment, and whether it's valid for agenda items. This improves maintainability and reduces code duplication.
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
  • GitHub Check: Run tests for talawa api
  • GitHub Check: Analyse Code With CodeQL (typescript)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
test/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.test.ts (3)

1-30: LGTM! Well-structured type definitions with proper TypeScript practices.

The interfaces are well-defined with:

  • Clear separation of concerns
  • Proper type inheritance
  • Correct usage of ReturnType for mock functions

32-83: LGTM! Comprehensive mock setup with proper context initialization.

The mock setup includes:

  • Complete drizzle client mock with chainable methods
  • Both authenticated and unauthenticated contexts
  • Proper environment configuration

85-558: LGTM! Comprehensive test coverage with well-structured assertions.

The test suite thoroughly covers:

  • Authentication validation
  • Input validation
  • User existence checks
  • Authorization checks
  • Error conditions
  • Success cases
  • Edge cases

Each test case has proper setup, execution, and assertions.

test/graphql/types/Mutation/updateAgendaItem.test.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link

Our Pull Request Approval Process

Thanks for contributing!

Testing Your Code

Remember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:

  1. We don't merge PRs with poor code quality.
    1. Follow coding best practices such that CodeRabbit.ai approves your PR.
  2. We don't merge PRs with failed tests.
    1. When tests fail, click on the Details link to learn more.
    2. Write sufficient tests for your changes (CodeCov Patch Test). Your testing level must be better than the target threshold of the repository
    3. Tests may fail if you edit sensitive files. Ask to add the ignore-sensitive-files-pr label if the edits are necessary.
  3. We cannot merge PRs with conflicting files. These must be fixed.

Our policies make our code better.

Reviewers

Do not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
When your PR has been assigned reviewers contact them to get your code reviewed and approved via:

  1. comments in this PR or
  2. our slack channel

Reviewing Your Code

Your reviewer(s) will have the following roles:

  1. arbitrators of future discussions with other contributors about the validity of your changes
  2. point of contact for evaluating the validity of your work
  3. person who verifies matching issues by others that should be closed.
  4. person who gives general guidance in fixing your tests

CONTRIBUTING.md

Read our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:

  1. PRs with issues not assigned to you will be closed by the reviewer
  2. Fix the first comment in the PR so that each issue listed automatically closes

Other

  1. 🎯 Please be considerate of our volunteers' time. Contacting the person who assigned the reviewers is not advised unless they ask for your input. Do not @ the person who did the assignment otherwise.
  2. Read the CONTRIBUTING.md file make

@shivasankaran18
Copy link
Author

@coderabbitai approve PR

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 10, 2025

@shivasankaran18 I'll approve the PR as the changes are well-tested and meet the requirements.

✅ Actions performed

Comments resolved and changes approved.

@shivasankaran18
Copy link
Author

@palisadoes @Cioppolo14 please review this PR

@palisadoes
Copy link
Contributor

  1. This needs to be closed
  2. There have been over 100 updates to the PR without a significant change in the code coverage of the file.
  3. Please try again when you have fixed the issue

@palisadoes palisadoes closed this Feb 11, 2025
@shivasankaran18
Copy link
Author

@palisadoes the code coverage is 99.2% now ..

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants